You are not logged in.
Since I haven't seen your broken collar bone, why should I believe your story?
Touché!
You're welcome to ride pillion with me as I deliver various packages around London, England & Wales on my despatch motorbike. It won't do 320kph but I will go fast enough to scare you witless, if that's what you want. Just PM me next time you're in London
EDIT: fair warning though: I haven't carried a pillion for about 20 years and I threw the last one 30 yards down the road doing a stoppie trying to avoid the Volvo that broke my pelvis.
It's a deal!
I grew up riding, and had quite a few spills myself, so I'm good.
I cracked my collar bone once and went for over a week in excruciating pain, because I didn't want to tell my parents. I was lying in the floor one day shortly thereafter...moving my arm round-and-round to see if I could work the pain away. Suddenly, there was a loud CRACK. My mother asked what the sound was...
I had broken the collar bone that was cracked.
I have a permanent lump on it, because according to the doctor, the cracked bone had been trying to heal before I completely broke it.
Not really, that's what peer review is all about
The experiments in any published papers can be independently reproduced and the results can be checked.
I'm not talking about that; I was referring to day-in/day-out and on-sight testing where the results are part of the daily operations.
Did you know I trained as a medical student?
No, I didn't.
Here's my request. If you were my doctor, I would hope that you would prescribe for me to complete 10 laps of motorcycle racing of no less than 320 kph, and ending with me just sitting on that beast in order to allow its guttural rumble to calm and sooth my hypertension.
Can you write that prescription for me?
EDIT: @HoaS...not hevidevi
I clicked the link.
So...I'm just to believe all of that scientific mumbo-jumbo is true?
By the way, I've worked in a scientific field for over 25 years, so I'm poking fun at myself.
One thing I've learned...scientists are human too. Just like workers in any field, some of them lie, cheat, steal, take shortcuts, and falsify data...but the people receiving the results have faith in the information obtained.
...and don't get me started on medical doctors and healthcare...
Anyway...please don't tell me that you believe some guy named Linus Torvalds wrote the code for the kernel used in what we know as GNU/Linux.
I know, I know...there is some guy alive today who goes by the name of Linus Torvalds, and people credit him for the kernel...but did you physically watch him write that code? Do you just accept that he wrote it by faith?
...and getting him to testify that he is Linus Torvalds and he wrote the code won't convince me, because I didn't see him write it. All the people who would testify that he wrote it won't convince me either, because people lie...and he could have paid them off.
In fact, as far as I know, this Manchurian Candidate known as Linus Torvalds is a pawn...created by a bunch of people who have their own agenda to cause divisiveness in whether it should be called GNU/Linux or just Linux...and it only shows that they will stop at nothing to push their agenda.
So go ahead and drink the koolaid...
By the way...I believe in Santa Claus. Sure...I can't prove that he's real, but you can't prove that he's not.
...and I'm supposed to take your words as truth by faith?
If I swing a pendulum, it will swing.
Please don't tell me that you believe a guy named Ghengis Khan actually existed!
Now...perhaps it seems to have been forgotten that I am playing Devil's Advocate and just having fun here. I can keep going if needed. However, my point is that everyone believes in things that they can't prove. Everyone has faith. Proof may not require faith, but neither does faith require proof. Let everyone be convinced in his own mind and heart.
Just please...PLEASE don't tell me that you believe Leonardo da Vinci actually existed.
Wha'the?
So now we've moved to earth rotation?
Can you meet me here in Florida and personally prove to me that the earth rotates? Don't bring any science books or scientific journals. Just sit me down and show me that it rotates.
...and that weird light in the sky is Ra.
I'd almost be willing to wager that you believe that Napoleon was a real person...even though you can't prove it.
MiyoLinux wrote:Have you ever personally witnessed planet earth moving around the sun?
I can discern the spheroid nature of our planet by simply going to the beach and observing the horizon — the tops of the ships appear before the rest. This can only be true if the surface is curving away from my observation point.
This is how people knew the Earth wasn't flat thousands of years before they were able to fly high enough to observe the curvature directly.
For more on this see https://physicsworld.com/a/fighting-flat-earth-theory/
And if you want a good laugh watch Behind The Curve — the Flat Earth people devise an experiment to "prove" their theory but in the last scene in the film it shows the exact opposite
Wha'the?
...you quoted regarding the earth going around the sun, but proceeded to talk about the earth being spherical?
I would wager that you believe William Shakespeare was a real person even though you can't prove that he was.
@MiyoLinux . . . Are you suggesting that the movement of planet earth around the sun is a belief? Maybe the earth is flat too?! LOL!!
Well, perhaps a flat earth belief is going to make it into your neighborhood school . . . You never know these days . . .
Wha'the?
Okay...I'll play Devil's Advocate for the fun of it...
Have you ever personally witnessed planet earth moving around the sun? I will go out on a llimb here and venture to say that you haven't...that you've never taken a trip into space far enough out in order to see (for yourself) that planet earth does indeed move around the sun...
...or...
...do you accept that belief by faith?
Faith in what you've learned from others.
Faith in what you learned from books.
Faith in what others have taught you to believe to be true.
How can you personally verify that it's true?
As far as we can attest, there's this bright light that appears in the sky each morning, and it disappears later in the evening.
In fact, how do you know that there was a person named George Washington...who is ascribed as being "the father of our nation"...the "first President of the United States"?
Did you ever witness him for yourself, or do you accept that he existed and that his exploits are true by faith?
Faith in what you learned from others.
Faith in what you learned from books.
Faith in what others have taught you to be true.
...and don't point to history books. After all, human beings are notorious liars and history can be falsified. We can only put our faith in this story about this supposed man called George Washington...and hope that some shifty people didn't make it all up because they thought it would make a good story.
And don't point to paintings of him. Paintings only prove that an artist painted something...well...unless you were alive to see George Washington pose for said paintings.
And don't point to signatures of him. All that proves is someone signed that name. Signatures are easily and often forged.
And don't point to his image on bills and coins. All that proves is that some guy's image is on them.
Truth be known, you weren't alive centuries ago to verify if Washington actually existed and did the things ascribed to him.
How do you know that the person (and history) of George Washington is true if you didn't live back then and verify it for yourself?
I would venture to say that you accept George Washington by faith.
...n'stuff
...but that's okay. I won't make fun of you for believing in him even though you can't prove that he existed.
LOL!
...and here we have the conundrum of belief.
What I believe may not be what you believe, but according to your belief...what you believe is greater (and more sound) than what I believe; therefore, my belief is inferior to your belief in your belief; however, your belief is no more relevant than the belief of me or someone else. Therefore, to believe something relegates belief to the individual's belief in what is true. Other's truth may not be other's truth. Therefore, be satisfied in your own mind that your truth is the truth...and hope that your truth is truth.
...n'stuff
Yeah...I'm not fond of those hipster things either.
Just give me dmenu, and I make keybinds for my most frequently opened apps.
My personal system is pretty bare-bones.
I trained my chickens to bite openbsd users.
You win...you definitely win.
Okay...enough of this feigned pet foolishness.
1. When I was a kid, we had a pet crow. This was back when "beehive" hairdos were popular in the US.
One day, my aunt came over...with her beehive...and our pet crow promptly proceeded to land in that beautiful nest of hair.
2. When I was a kid, we had a pet squirrel (which was missing one toe on one of his front paws). Same aunt...the squirrel decided to make himself at home in her beehive...
3. Fast forward to modern-day....
We bought a chiweenie for our son's first dog. She's a natural...the perfect OS guard dog...our son named her Julliet, but I call her Puppy...
Let me explain further...
First, I truly appreciate your obmenu-generator .deb package. It makes it easy to install for others.
However, it only takes a few commands to install it from trizen...which I give on my rinky-dink website.
It's the method that I prefer.
I will readily admit that I haven't tried your .deb package in a few years, so what I'm about to say may no longer be the case...
However, the last time I tried your .deb package, It brought in a lot more dependencies than what was required for installing it straight from trizen's github and using cpanminus. It also put extra files in some places than installing it straight from trizen's github and using cpanminus.
Using the trizen/cpanminus method, the menu will normally continue to work unless there is a major update to perl...which is why manyroads lost the menu.
The command I gave updates the necessary perl module.
...but that's my preference.
If a user would prefer to use your .deb file, that's perfectly fine with me.
However, I will still prefer the trizen/cpanminus method.
Yes, you have mentioned it before, and I will defer to you.
However, I've personally never had issues with cpanm, the occasional fix, nor the occasional reinstallation of obmenu-generator to bring it up to date.
...but that's me.
Looks beautiful! Thanks for sharing it!
I realize you're probably not using openbox in addition to dwm and i3, but f you ever want to fix that broken obmenu-generator menu...
1 - Open the terminal and enter the following command as root (su or sudo)...
cpanm Linux::DesktopFiles
2 - If no icons are showing in the menu after that, enter the following command in the terminal (DO NOT use su or sudo)...
obmenu-generator -p -i
3 - Log out and log back in.
Stalk much, Miyo?
XXX XXXXXXXXX XXX XXX
XXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXX
XXX XXX XXX XXX XXXX
XXX XXX XXX XXX XXXX
XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX
XXX XXX XXX XXX XX
XXX XXX XXX XXX
XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX
XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXX
EDIT: and what makes you think I identify as male?
Perhaps it's your moniker? Head_on_a_Stick. Very masculine.
Perhaps it's your love of motorcycle racing? Very masculine. Don't ask me how I know. I just do.
Perhaps it's the tone of your responses? Straight and to the point. Very masculine.
Then again...
...your ability to debate, argue, and put people in their place could probably give many women a run for their money.
Now I'm confused myself.
Seems like I recall 7.0.x.x.x getting a lot of complaints in the past.
Perhaps try the backports version? It's newer...almost the version that's in Ceres.
My pleasure...
...no matter how screwed up my pleasure is.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Thanks Ron! Take care buddy!
...and if ralph.ronnquist reads this from down-under....
¡ɹǝʞɐǝus ʎʞɐǝus noʎ˙˙˙˙noʎ ƃuᴉɥɔʇɐʍ ɯ,I
Question: Is this the same command that runs when I click Shut Down in the window screenshot I posted?
I don't know Ron. Sorry.
Perhaps it is, but if it is, perhaps it has a "sleep" command of 60 seconds before it engages?
I'll defer to MATE experts here...
...by the way...
If I were confronted with that stinkin' dialogue box every time I just wanted to shut down, I'd have a nervous-jerkdown, want to bludgeon it, and force it into my pain-cave to subject it to all kinds of unscrupulous thumb-screws, the rack, and other torturous stuff n'stuff.
LOLOLOLOL!!!
Thanks. Taking your command, I created a new "Custom Application Launcher" in the panel (right click in the panel and select Add to Panel), and in the Name box put in "Shut Down the computer" and in the Command box I put in your command "loginctl poweroff". It works. Thanks again.
HOORAY!!!
Hi Ron.
As you probably know, I'm not familiar with MATE, nor am I familiar with how to add things to its panel.
Here's a test for you though...
WARNING: THIS SHOULD SHUT YOUR COMPUTER OFF!!!
Open your terminal (or Run Command...if MATE has a Run Command), and enter this...
loginctl poweroff
...if that shuts your computer down, then OKAY...HOORAY!
Perhaps someone with MATE knowledge can help further with adding this to your panel; however, I can give you a menu item that "should" work.
1. Open your file manager, and navigate to ~/.local/share/applications/ in your HOME folder.
2. Create a new .desktop file...you can name it whatever you want, but for this example, we will name it shutdown.desktop
3. Enter the following information in it...
[Desktop Entry]
Type=Application
Name=Shutdown
Exec=loginctl poweroff
Icon=system-shutdown
Terminal=false
Categories=Sytem;
It should then show in your menu in the System (?) Category and clicking on it should shut down your computer right then and there without notice...unless I'm completely UN-MATED with how MATE mates things n'stuff.
Again...if any MATE experts can help further, I will gladly defer to them.