You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
And nothing much is gained by watching someone post a working system with user services ported from a BSD userland while navigating Devuan's, um, knotty relationship with elogind and asking if they're "working on fixing a backend to another project's service." People post umpteen Openbox clones that are just darker and darker Crunchbang clones with zero negative comments and one dude who doesn't speak English natively gets grilled on his understanding of init, service and session management by someone who wanted to give OP enough rope rhetorically to hang himself.
It's like you wanted a deeper conversation, couldn't get it because the other person was on a different stage of their journey into learning about OS fundamentals, and then decided to end by telling everyone why you were right instead of taking the decent step like FSmith does in almost every thread of just trying to point in one useful or elucidating direction.
It's so weird to see administrators watching the second or third person (outside of ProwlerGR with the Devuan/Antix InitDiversity spins, which are incredible work) try to loosen systemD's stranglehold via Dinit and say, "Nothing complicated."
No, system inits and service files aren't generally complicated. But Devuan has stuck with SysV and OpenRC for as long as y'all have because the legwork was also being done on other distros, so you could share the workload. Antix doesn't move to Runit without Void, etc. etc.
Working from Chimaera to Devuan is a genuinely interesting path. Why you feel the need to belittle it is probably why Devuan is the community that it is.
Pages: 1