You are not logged in.
Head_on_a_Stick wrote:
Because they were laughing at the clueless idiots, perhaps?
Real good marketing ploy . . . exposing your own user base as supposed idiots. That makes the "jokers" the idiots.
Lysander wrote:
Can we please stop this before it starts and not pollute a third forum with the same bullshit that infected FDN and DUF?
Okay, I'm done. Now tell that to Head_on_a_Stick who keeps insulting people.
Head_on_a_Stick
I reckon the Devuan devs just didn't think anybody would be stupid enough to think the joke was real.
Making your own website looked hacked, that's the real stupidity.
ChuangTzu wrote:
How would you feel if your bank said "we were hacked today etc..." then announced just kidding a day later. Your Dr. says, you have cancer...nah just yanking your chain.There comes a time when people need to grow up, its not about being frat boys and sorority girls anymore. The dev's need to stop hiding behind some false hacker ethos to shrug off poor judgement. Big difference between honest mistakes and poor judgement.
Nicely put. And so true.
Saying 1 + 1 = 3 is human error. What this guy(s) did was just plain stupid. If I were in charge, he'd be gone.
dxrobertson wrote:
I thought the joke/page display was done internally, by a Devuan admin, as a joke.
Well, that's what I thought also. Can somebody who knows what happened please inform the rest of us on the whole story, joke, or whatever it was?
Head_on_a_Stick wrote:
Fooling you is awesome, yes. You actually took time off work because of this?
Your powers of reading comprehension are amazing. Read what I wrote again.
Head_on_a_Stick wrote:
I though it was an awesome joke, the more so for all the people it apparently fooled lol
So fooling people that use your product is "awesome"? That's just plain stupid. Yes, I'm angry over this. It didn't cost me work time, it cost me some time from my time off of work. There's a good reason why people and businesses that put out products for a profit don't fool their customers. This "joke" was not smart.
Ogis wrote:
That's right. It's a joke.
Making your own website look like it was hacked is not a joke. I wonder how many people it made wonder if their system or browser was compromised after visiting this "joke"? Not funny and may cost Devuan current and future users.
This was not harmless humor. I'd still like to know who did this, and how high up the Devuan food-chain they are. Making your own website look like it was hacked? How stupid can you get? If people don't take Devuan seriously, it looks like now they got a reason. Way to go.
P.S. I really do want to know how high this person is on the Devuan food-chain. The higher up they are, the dumber this "joke" was.
![]()
Really? Someone with Devuan did this? Unbelievable!
sgage wrote:
Hopefully we'll learn some details. I'd like to see more info here, and soonish...
That makes two of us.
This is bad publicity for Devuan. How did this happen? A weak password or something?
sgage wrote:
I tried copying the comment link, and when I tested it, it went to nothing. Just go to the article and search for 'defacement poster' or something and you'll find it.
I found it 3 minutes before your post. ![]()
sgage wrote:
Ron, I just read this on SlashDot:"I just looked at the source for the page. It's static HTML with the ASCII art defacement poster enclosed in [pre] tags. There isn't any code there with which one could conceivably conduct an attack."
Can you give me a link to that? All I found was this: https://idle.slashdot.org/story/19/03/3 … pher-urls#
EDIT
Never mind, I see the quote at the bottom of the page I linked.
So for those of us who visited the hacked site, do we need to be concerned about a compromised system/browser?
What happened at devuan.org? Has it been hacked?
Panopticon wrote:
Many of the old legacy plugins in are available in palemoon too.
Here's a link with probably thousands (yeah, thousands) of legacy (so-called) add-ons. I would guess that a high majority will work in Pale Moon.
Hope some will find this link useful.
I have been happily using Pale Moon for the last 6 or 7 years (started with it while on Windows), and have Basilisk as a backup. There are no other browsers out there (right now) for me, except maybe Waterfox if I had to.
This is also off topic . . .
When I tried avidemux (it may have been twice, my memory isn't as good anymore) it was so buggy I got rid of it.
Thanks for the info, MiyoLinux. So at risk of hijacking this thread, will future releases of Miyo-Openbox (or Awesome) continue to not include pulseaudio?
Does Miyo have pulseaudio already removed? It's not installed on my system and I don't remember removing it.
I'm not sure I understand the problem, but maybe this link below will help??
Upload your screenshot to an image site (such as imgur) and put the link inside of
[img][/img]tags. Your link should end in an image format, such as .jpg.
cretsiah wrote:
I know I was originally looking at a full KDE install, but no im not as sure footed on this idea after poking my nose around the KDE website.
Check out the Trinity desktop. It is a fork of KDE version 3.
This is a perfect example of why I avoid everything of Poettering's.
Thanks for that link. I have read that in the past. I forgot it was a sticky. So I gather from the sticky that libsystemd0 does nothing. So in that case I guess it doesn't matter if I update it or not? Is that correct?
Is it okay to delete this file? (Sorry if this is a thick-headed question) ![]()