<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=8218&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / tzdata from daedalus-security is a deb12 build on a deb13 system]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=8218</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in tzdata from daedalus-security is a deb12 build on a deb13 system.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 21:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: tzdata from daedalus-security is a deb12 build on a deb13 system]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65739#p65739</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>daedalus is based on debian 12 &quot;bookworm&quot;, excalibur is based on debian 13 &quot;trixie&quot;.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (delgado)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65739#p65739</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: tzdata from daedalus-security is a deb12 build on a deb13 system]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65738#p65738</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue that&#039;s known is that daedalus is not trixie. It&#039;s whatever &quot;B&quot; was before trixie and was 12 (bookworm?). </p><p>Devuan Excalibur is Debian Trixie.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 21:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65738#p65738</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[tzdata from daedalus-security is a deb12 build on a deb13 system]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65737#p65737</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Subject: tzdata from daedalus-security is a deb12 build on a deb13 system — conflicts with tzdata-legacy</p><p>Hi all,</p><p>I&#039;d like to report what looks like a repository synchronization issue with tzdata on Devuan Daedalus, and ask whether this is a known problem.</p><p>## System</p><p>- Devuan Daedalus (based on Debian 13 / Trixie, i.e. deb13 packages)<br />- Architecture: amd64<br />- Sources: deb.devuan.org/merged (daedalus, daedalus-updates, daedalus-security)</p><p>## Problem</p><p>After a routine `apt update`, APT proposed an &quot;upgrade&quot; of tzdata from the installed<br />2026b-0+deb13u1 to 2026c-0+deb12u1. Note the version string: the candidate is a<br />*deb12* (Bookworm) build, while the installed package is a *deb13* build.</p><p>`apt list --upgradable -a`:</p><p>&#160; &#160; tzdata/oldstable-security 2026c-0+deb12u1 all [upgradable from: 2026b-0+deb13u1]<br />&#160; &#160; tzdata/now 2026b-0+deb13u1 all [installed,upgradable to: 2026c-0+deb12u1]<br />&#160; &#160; tzdata/oldstable 2026b-0+deb12u1 all<br />&#160; &#160; tzdata/oldstable-updates 2025b-0+deb12u1 all</p><p>At first, installing the candidate failed with a dependency conflict:</p><p>&#160; &#160; Dependency resolution failed:<br />&#160; &#160; The following packages have unmet dependencies:<br />&#160; &#160; &#160; tzdata-legacy: Conflicts: tzdata-bookworm</p><p>Attempting the upgrade with `apt install -t daedalus-security tzdata` still pulled the<br />deb12 build from daedalus-security:</p><p>&#160; &#160; Get:1 <a href="http://deb.devuan.org/merged" rel="nofollow">http://deb.devuan.org/merged</a> daedalus-security/main amd64 tzdata all 2026c-0+deb12u1 [304 kB]</p><p>The upgrade then removed tzdata-legacy, and as a knock-on effect also removed:</p><p>&#160; &#160; unar, gnustep-base-common, gnustep-base-runtime, libgnustep-base1.31</p><p>`apt-cache policy tzdata` afterwards:</p><p>&#160; &#160; tzdata:<br />&#160; &#160; &#160; Installed: 2026c-0+deb12u1<br />&#160; &#160; &#160; Candidate: 2026c-0+deb12u1<br />&#160; &#160; &#160; Version table:<br />&#160; &#160; &#160;*** 2026c-0+deb12u1 500<br />&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; 500 <a href="http://deb.devuan.org/merged" rel="nofollow">http://deb.devuan.org/merged</a> daedalus-security/main amd64 Packages<br />&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status<br />&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;2026b-0+deb12u1 500<br />&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; 500 <a href="http://deb.devuan.org/merged" rel="nofollow">http://deb.devuan.org/merged</a> daedalus/main amd64 Packages<br />&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;2025b-0+deb12u1 500<br />&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; 500 <a href="http://deb.devuan.org/merged" rel="nofollow">http://deb.devuan.org/merged</a> daedalus-updates/main amd64 Packages</p><p>As you can see, every available version of tzdata in the daedalus repositories is a<br />deb12 build, even though the rest of the system is deb13.</p><p>## Questions</p><p>1. Is this a known issue? I could not find an existing bug report for it.<br />2. Is the deb12 build of tzdata in daedalus-security intentional, or is this a<br />&#160; &#160;synchronization problem where the deb13 build has not yet propagated to the<br />&#160; &#160;Devuan mirrors?<br />3. Until a proper deb13 build is available, is holding tzdata (`apt-mark hold tzdata`)<br />&#160; &#160;the recommended workaround?<br />4. Is there a known way to keep both tzdata and tzdata-legacy installed, or is the<br />&#160; &#160;conflict between them expected on this release?</p><p>I&#039;ve held tzdata for now to avoid repeating the mismatched upgrade. Happy to provide<br />more logs if useful.</p><p>Thanks.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (zerrax)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 19:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65737#p65737</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
