<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=8210&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / (PostIt) Devuan Benchmark Results]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=8210</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in (PostIt) Devuan Benchmark Results.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 06:13:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: (PostIt) Devuan Benchmark Results]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65761#p65761</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I managed to install&#160; v:2.3 in Excalibur from backports and executed a Syncronize command.<br />Sync do both benchmarks and it updates the hardinfo2 data. <br />Giving a usernote ( i gave nogroup:enouswater270926) i can access these benchmarks: <br /><a href="https://hardinfo2.org/?u=nogroup" rel="nofollow">@</a>. (in the first blank field drop the menu).</p><p>It seems that full report data are not uploaded.</p><p>After an Q&amp;A&#160; with the programmer he says that tha db is freely downloadable.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (chomwitt)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 06:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65761#p65761</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: (PostIt) Devuan Benchmark Results]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65752#p65752</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://pkginfo.devuan.org/cgi-bin/policy-query.html?c=package&amp;q=hardinfo2&amp;x=submit" rel="nofollow">@</a> hardinfo2 in Devuan.</p><p>I need excalibur <a href="https://wiki.devuan.org/?n=Chomwitt.Backports" rel="nofollow">@</a> backports for v:2.3&#160; if we want when we sycn our data to have a usernote field.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (chomwitt)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 10:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65752#p65752</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: (PostIt) Devuan Benchmark Results]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65745#p65745</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@ fwiw</p><p>Devuan 6 Excalibur Benchmark<br /><a href="https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V11/display.php?id=512639353735" rel="nofollow">https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V11/ … 2639353735</a></p><p>Hardinfo2 results - 9700X Generic System <br />Devuan 6 Excalibur - KDE on X11 - <br /><a href="https://sudden-bronze-ugdw17r5.edgeone.dev/" rel="nofollow">https://sudden-bronze-ugdw17r5.edgeone.dev/</a></p><p>sorry for the interruption.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (kapqa)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 10:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65745#p65745</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: (PostIt) Devuan Benchmark Results]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65721#p65721</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hardinfo2 has a &#039;Synchronize&#039; command where our computing node and benchmark info are sent to a database.<br /><a href="https://github.com/hardinfo2/hardinfo2?tab=readme-ov-file#privacy-policy" rel="nofollow">@</a>Their privacy policy.</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>When using the Synchronize feature in Hardinfo2, some information may be stored indefinitely in our servers.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I would like a foss to have an downloadable database in a form easily processed by foss .</p><p>The site has its gathered info organized nicely. I did a &#039;Sync&#039; but the program gives no feedback neither about giving me a chance to see what info collected neither a link to the updated database. </p><p>So in that regard Passmark is better in giving you asap a link to your published data.</p><p>Thinking lately about the proliferation of rampant aggressive webcrawlers that feed their mama&#039;s big LLM with training data i think we should exercise extremely caution about our data and surely a foss license is not enough to cover that issues.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (chomwitt)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 06:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65721#p65721</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: (PostIt) Devuan Benchmark Results]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65719#p65719</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>---------------- hardinfo 2 ------------------<br />System: Devuan 6 , Xfce<br />CPU:i7-4790 </p><ul><li><p>CPU Blowfish (Single-thread) 12.89</p></li><li><p>CPU Blowfish (Multi-thread) 75</p></li><li><p>CPU Blowfish (Multi-core) 50</p></li><li><p>CPU Zlib&#160; &#160;73</p></li><li><p>CPU CryptoHash&#160; 32</p></li><li><p>CPU Fibonacci&#160; 2270</p></li><li><p>CPU N-Queens&#160; 1562</p></li><li><p>FPU FFT&#160; &#160; 148</p></li><li><p>FPU Raytracing (Single-thread)&#160; 2481</p></li><li><p>SysBench CPU (Single-thread)&#160; 1128 (*1) </p></li><li><p>SysBench CPU (Multi-thread)&#160; 7849(*1)</p></li><li><p>SysBench Memory (Single-thread)&#160; 7115(*1)</p></li><li><p>SysBench Memory (Multi-thread)18556(*1)</p></li></ul><p> (*1) At the bottom is displayed: Alexey Kopytov&#039;s sysbench is required . But i see that sysbench is installed!<br />---------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>------------- Performance test&#160; (license:propr) --------------<br />System: Devuan 6 , Xfce<br />CPU:i7-4790</p><p><a href="https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V11/display.php?id=512623226461" rel="nofollow">@</a>Benchmark/PassMark PerfomanceTest (11.0.1004) Results for Excalibur/i7-4790 CPU @ 3.60GHz (x86_64)<br />4 cores @ 7 MHz&#160; |&#160; 31.3 GiB RAM<br />----------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>ps:</p><p>This post was created in Excalibur/Netsurf where there was no cursor while editing and neither toolbar but hey .. its worked without js!</p><p>Also indeed the command proposed by @kapqa in this thread previously, in order to run the propriatory benchmark utiliy PerforanceTest in Devuan releases without libnurses 5 ,worked for me in Excalibur. </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>sudo ln -s /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libncurses.so.6 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libncurses.so.5</code></pre></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (chomwitt)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 20:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65719#p65719</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: (PostIt) Devuan Benchmark Results]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65718#p65718</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@chomwitt </p><p>the shortcut proposed should suffice for the task at hand;</p><p>here are some hardinfo2 result for comparision</p><p>------<br />hardinfo2<br />------</p><p>(result not so relevant for Devuan)</p><p>CPU Blowfish (Single-thread)&#160; &#160; 16x 5582.00 MHz&#160; &#160;58.44|<br />CPU Blowfish (Multi-thread)&#160; &#160; &#160;16x 5582.00 MHz&#160; &#160;&#160; &#160; 556.95 |<br />CPU Blowfish (Multi-core)&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; 16x 5582.00 MHz&#160; &#160; 441.33<br />SysBench CPU (Single-thread)&#160; 16x 5582.00 MHz&#160; &#160; 6342.99<br />SysBench CPU (Multi-thread)&#160; &#160; &#160;16x 5582.00 MHz&#160; &#160; 50505.06</p><p>(these probably more influenced by OpenSource Drivers)</p><p>funnily GPU drawing got values for RX 7600 in the realms of NV 4070TI</p><p>GPU Drawing </p><p>(AMD Radeon RX 7600&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; 2454.93) &lt; (NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER/PCIe/SSE2&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; 2513.84)</p><p><del>and for GPU OpenGL Drawing came out one top?</del></p><p>(AMD Radeon RX 7600&#160; &#160; 4595.50) &gt; (Radeon RX 7900 XTX&#160; &#160; 3512.29)</p><p>GPU Vulkan drawing not so fast</p><p>(AMD Radeon RX 7600&#160; &#160; 26607.16 ) &lt; (AMD Radeon 8060S&#160; &#160; 43247.77)</p><p><span class="bbu">Cache Memory</span></p><p>AMD Ryzen 7 9700X&#160; &#160; 163008.08|16x 5582.00 MHz<br />-------</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (kapqa)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 11:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65718#p65718</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: (PostIt) Devuan Benchmark Results]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65717#p65717</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Running PassMark PerfomanceTest raises the challange of installing a package (libncurses5) not available at my Devuan Release.</p><p>finally i added daedalus to my sources . libncurses5 depends on libtinfo5 which depends on multiarch-support</p><p>(out of linear thread&#039;s timeline addition) :<br />The kapka&#039;s proposed solution is: </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>sudo ln -s /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libncurses.so.6 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libncurses.so.5</code></pre></div><p>and tried it again in a different <a href="https://wiki.devuan.org/?n=Chomwitt.DevuanReleasesTable" rel="nofollow">Devuan 6</a> it worked .</p><p>But i think that is accidental. Since Passmark&#039;s utility asks for libncurse5 it may be they are lazy to recompile and just be a naming issue but could be sth more. On the other hand my proposal to add in my system&#039;s apt source an older release could it be to much for a change . But it the depedency was more &#039;hard&#039; i think it would be better.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (chomwitt)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 09:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65717#p65717</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: (PostIt) Devuan Benchmark Results]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65716#p65716</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V11/display.php?id=512620120189" rel="nofollow">@</a> my PassMark PerfomanceTest (11.0.1004) Results for Excalibur.</p><p>So : AMD Ryzen 9 5900X&#160; performance seems close to AMD Ryzen 7 9700X.</p><p>Also some hardinfo2 benchmarks:<br />AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core&#160; &#160; 24x 4951.00 MHz&#160; &#160; </p><ul><li><p>CPU Blowfish (Single-thread) 35.57</p></li><li><p>CPU Blowfish (Multi-thread) 469.43</p></li><li><p>CPU Blowfish (Multi-core) 400.66</p></li><li><p>CPU Zlib&#160; &#160;308.51</p></li><li><p>CPU CryptoHash&#160; 105.80</p></li><li><p>CPU Fibonacci&#160; &#160;9928.79</p></li><li><p>CPU N-Queens&#160; 6261.64</p></li><li><p>FPU FFT&#160; &#160; 662.61</p></li><li><p>FPU Raytracing (Single-thread)&#160; 3695.20</p></li><li><p>SysBench CPU (Single-thread)&#160; 5461.55</p></li><li><p>SysBench CPU (Multi-thread)&#160; &#160;68252.09</p></li><li><p>SysBench Memory (Single-thread)&#160; 8834.38</p></li><li><p>SysBench Memory (Multi-thread)11986.74</p></li></ul>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (chomwitt)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 09:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65716#p65716</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: (PostIt) Devuan Benchmark Results]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65713#p65713</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@GlennW , thanks , yours got to be the new benchmark! <br />Found out i am still bit afraid of heights <br /><a href="https://www.cpubenchmark.net/common_cpus.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.cpubenchmark.net/common_cpus.html</a></p><p>@chomwitt you can use this shortcut</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>sudo ln -s /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libncurses.so.6 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libncurses.so.5</code></pre></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (kapqa)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 07:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65713#p65713</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: (PostIt) Devuan Benchmark Results]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65712#p65712</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Performance test need libncurses.so.5.<br />How do you installed it?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (chomwitt)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 07:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65712#p65712</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: (PostIt) Devuan Benchmark Results]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65711#p65711</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>cool!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (GlennW)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 02:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65711#p65711</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[(PostIt) Devuan Benchmark Results]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65687#p65687</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>one recent for </p><p>Devuan GNU/Linux 7 (freia/ceres)</p><p><a href="https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V11/display.php?id=512609603226" rel="nofollow">https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V11/ … 2609603226</a></p><p><em>Search Baselines Matching:</em><br /><em>OS: NA</em></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (kapqa)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 16:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65687#p65687</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
