<![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / dinit /runit / openrc / s6 which one is most similar to sysv-init?]]> https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=8179 Wed, 09 Sep 2026 19:28:46 +0000 FluxBB <![CDATA[Re: dinit /runit / openrc / s6 which one is most similar to sysv-init?]]> https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65445#p65445 probably openrc since it does re-use some components such as the core init program from sysvinit init(8), with the rest of the openrc being pretty much a service supervision suite implemented on top of it, or at least that is what i understand as a condensed form of what the gentoo wiki says about openrc

https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/OpenRC

]]> Wed, 09 Sep 2026 19:28:46 +0000 https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65445#p65445 <![CDATA[dinit /runit / openrc / s6 which one is most similar to sysv-init?]]> https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65444#p65444 While my daily driver is  running Devuan with sysV-init I would like to explore Artix Linux on a secondary PC.

But Artix Linux has ISOs for 4 different init systems but not sysV-init: dinit /runit / openrc / s6

I'm not familiar with any of them, I only have experience with sysV-init and Upstart (and systemd, not by choice).

Which one of the 4 init systems Artix offers is most similar to sysV-init?

By similar I mean that it uses ideally the same init scripts  as sysV-init in the familiar rc.d folder.
I liked Upstart because of this, it was perfectly backward compatible with the sysV init scripts.

Or in other words which one would you recommend to someone who is used to sysV-init and would like to feel at home as quickly as possible?

]]> Wed, 09 Sep 2026 18:36:37 +0000 https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65444#p65444