<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=7741&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / Kicksecure]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7741</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Kicksecure.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2026 04:24:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Kicksecure]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=61250#p61250</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.kicksecure.com/" rel="nofollow">Kicksecure</a> is a Debian-based &quot;distro&quot; that supposedly <em>requires</em> systemd. That being the case, it appears that it would not be possible to easily &quot;Devuanize&quot; Kicksecure.</p><p>Explanations for why this is (supposedly) the case can be found here:</p><p><strong>Non-Systemd - Systemd Development Discussion</strong><br /><a href="https://forums.kicksecure.com/t/non-systemd-systemd-development-discussion/766" rel="nofollow"> https://forums.kicksecure.com/t/non-systemd-systemd-development-discussion/766</a></p><p><strong>systemd</strong><br /><a href="https://www.kicksecure.com/wiki/Systemd" rel="nofollow">https://www.kicksecure.com/wiki/Systemd</a></p><p>A question for the more knowledgeable folks here: Considering the systemd features that are being used in Kicksecure, is systemd really as essential as Kicksecure&#039;s lead developer implies?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (pcalvert)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2026 04:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=61250#p61250</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
