<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=7336&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / gnome related files shuffle / replacement]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7336</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in gnome related files shuffle / replacement.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 16:07:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: gnome related files shuffle / replacement]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=57065#p57065</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>... policykit-1-gnome is gone ...<br />... directly replaceable with the mate-polkit.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Being a virtual package and provided by some other package (NN-polikit), to me* it&#039;s a <em>tomayto</em> = <em>tomahto</em> situation.<br />ie: still a virtual package provided by a real one instead of a real, stand alone package to do just <em>that </em>and <span class="bbu">only that</span>.<br />* ymmv, obviously.</p><p>So I&#039;ll just leave that one <em>as-is</em> and avoid the possibilty of something going south.</p><p>With respect to replacing <span class="bbc">pinentry-gnome3</span> with <span class="bbc">pinentry-curses</span>, any ideas as how to do it without screwing up?</p><p>Thanks for your input.</p><p>Best,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 16:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=57065#p57065</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: gnome related files shuffle / replacement]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=57062#p57062</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In Excalibur policykit-1-gnome is gone completely anyway. It is directly replaceable with the mate-polkit. Haven&#039;t tried it in XFCE but I have used it in Openbox and it works fine, it is DE agnostic as far as I know.</p><p>May need some minor tweaking, I had to replace a couple exec lines in some .desktops with a full pathway instead of just the name of the executable, but that was for some extensions, only one (one of my homemade apps) in /usr/share/applications. But other than that it dropped right in.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (greenjeans)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 15:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=57062#p57062</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[gnome related files shuffle / replacement]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=57061#p57061</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><p>Having had reasonable success in ridding my box of unnecessary gnome files, I still have two to solve: <span class="bbc">policykit-1-gnome</span> and <span class="bbc">pinentry-gnome3</span>.<br />I have taken care to check on all dependencies but you never know, I will post any complaints I get.</p><p>The remaining gnome related files are either by choice (<span class="bbc">gnome-disk-utility</span>) or dependencies of (<span class="bbc">timeshift</span>.</p><p>This is what <span class="bbc">aptitude</span> prints out when asked about:</p><p>1. <span class="bbc">policykit-1-gnome</span></p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>$ aptitude why policykit-1-gnome
i   thunar Recommends policykit-1-gnome | polkit-1-auth-agent
$ </code></pre></div><p>and <br />2. <span class="bbc">pinentry-gnome3</span></p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>$ aptitude why pinentry-gnome3
i   gnupg           Depends  gpg-agent (&lt; 2.2.40-1.1.1~)
i A gpg-agent       Depends  pinentry-curses | pinentry 
i A pinentry-gnome3 Provides pinentry                   
$ </code></pre></div><p>If I understand correctly, the alternative to <span class="bbc">policykit-1-gnome</span> would be <span class="bbc">polkit-1-auth-agent</span> and the alternative to <span class="bbc">pinentry-gnome3</span> would be <span class="bbc">pinentry-curses</span>.</p><p>Unfortunately, the first alternative is a <em>virtual</em> package provided, among others, by <span class="bbc">policykit-1-gnome</span>.</p><p>See here: <a href="https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/polkit-1-auth-agent" rel="nofollow">https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/po … auth-agent</a></p><p>So unless some other option is available, that will be it.</p><p>But <span class="bbc">pinentry-curses</span> <em>is</em> available ...</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>$ apt list | grep pinentry-curses
--- snip ---
pinentry-curses/stable 1.2.1-1 amd64
--- snip ---
$ </code></pre></div><p>... and can be installed to replace <span class="bbc">pinentry-gnome3</span>.</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>$ aptitude why pinentry-curses
i   gnupg     Depends gpg-agent (&lt; 2.2.40-1.1.1~)
i A gpg-agent Depends pinentry-curses | pinentry 
$ </code></pre></div><p><strong>Q:</strong> which would be the safe / proper manner to replace <span class="bbc">pinentry-gnome3</span> with <span class="bbc">pinentry-curses</span> and not wreak havok in my system?</p><p>Thanks in advance.</p><p>Best,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 15:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=57061#p57061</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
