<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=7293&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / Anyone have familiarity with GrapheneOS?]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7293</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Anyone have familiarity with GrapheneOS?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 23:25:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Anyone have familiarity with GrapheneOS?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56777#p56777</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@stargate_sg1_cheyenne-mtn</p><p>I have already noticed at least one small difference.</p><p>The way you close multiple tabs is to flick to the side of the bottom of the touchscreen. It was rather annoying that this was changed in grapheneos. But now that I know how it works, its fine.</p><p>I have yet to see the battery life and how good it is though.</p><p>I anticipate though that it will save battery life on a massive scale because it won&#039;t be doing as much dialing back to random places. the three letter agencies and google. Although it still has verizon, so there will be some minor problems there.</p><p>But its an improvement, a massive one.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (zapper)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 23:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56777#p56777</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Anyone have familiarity with GrapheneOS?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56772#p56772</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>^^^@zapper, thanks for your installation report! keep us posted on your experiences/observations/progress/etc</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (stargate-sg1-cheyenne-mtn)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 15:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56772#p56772</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Anyone have familiarity with GrapheneOS?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56770#p56770</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I installed it as of today, so fat so good, it works like it did before with the carrier in it, but better.</p><p>The only unfortunate thing is I couldn&#039;t install grapheneos&#160; in firefox. I&#160; had to install chromium to do it via webusb.</p><p>All in all, good to go!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (zapper)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 15:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56770#p56770</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Anyone have familiarity with GrapheneOS?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56744#p56744</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@steve_v well I guess I took it out of context, you mentioned the phone coming out of Britain. I guess i got mixed up. Nevermind...</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (zapper)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 04:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56744#p56744</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Anyone have familiarity with GrapheneOS?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56743#p56743</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>Your british?</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Nope. There&#039;s a clue in there if you really want to play guessing games, but that wasn&#039;t it.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (steve_v)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 04:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56743#p56743</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Anyone have familiarity with GrapheneOS?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56741#p56741</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@steve_v Your british? Hmm... wouldn&#039;t have known.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (zapper)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 01:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56741#p56741</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Anyone have familiarity with GrapheneOS?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56730#p56730</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Carrier branded phones might well have a locked bootloader as well (it&#039;s an option a carrier can request from the OEM), but IME that level of dickery is mostly a &#039;murican thing. Down here carrier locks of any kind are a rarity (outside of hire-purchase type arrangements), as is carrier branding in general... because we still have consumer-protection laws &#039;n stuff.</p><p>Personally I just refuse to deal with any provider that doesn&#039;t allow BYOD, and refuse to buy any device that&#039;s locked to a specific provider. <br />That usually means purchasing the hardware up-front at full price (or the used market, which I am a big proponent of in general), as opposed to the whole &quot;sign up and get $phone on discount / glorified hire&quot; thing. I&#039;ll gladly do that if it means I actually get to <em>own</em> my stuff. Matter of fact, <em>everything</em> I own I actually <em>own</em>, as a matter of principle.</p><p>My current phone came from England via ebay, and I did my own research on radio frequencies, carrier compatibility, lock status, parts availablilty and third-party OS support.<br />It was certainly more work than &quot;sign up with $provider, get phone, use phone&quot;, but OTOH this one is mine, and I get to do whatever I want with it, for as long as I want (or at least until the next ridiculous [X]G hype-wave).</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (steve_v)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 04:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56730#p56730</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Anyone have familiarity with GrapheneOS?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56729#p56729</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>stargate-sg1-cheyenne-mtn wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>tracfone unlocking webpage:</p><p><a href="https://www.tfwunlockpolicy.com/wps/portal/home/" rel="nofollow">https://www.tfwunlockpolicy.com/wps/portal/home/</a></p></div></blockquote></div><p>AFAIK, that&#039;s just for unlocking the ability to switch to a different carrier and has nothing to do with the bootloader. I would love to be wrong, though. Maybe I should try to unlock the bootloader on my Motorola phone to see what happens.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (pcalvert)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 01:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56729#p56729</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Anyone have familiarity with GrapheneOS?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56707#p56707</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@steve_v I don&#039;t think though Samsung phones that are unlocked can use verizon and certain other carriers too.</p><p>I could be wrong, but as for pixel devices, if you don&#039;t get them from the wrong source, yes its possible.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (zapper)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 04:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56707#p56707</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Anyone have familiarity with GrapheneOS?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56701#p56701</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>tracfone unlocking webpage:</p><p><a href="https://www.tfwunlockpolicy.com/wps/portal/home/" rel="nofollow"> https://www.tfwunlockpolicy.com/wps/portal/home/</a></p><p>sad how verizon has consumed Straight Talk, Net10, Clearway, Total, Tracfone, Simple Mobile, Safelink(obamaphone), and Walmart Family Mobile</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (stargate-sg1-cheyenne-mtn)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2025 22:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56701#p56701</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Anyone have familiarity with GrapheneOS?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56692#p56692</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Since I use cheap phones that don&#039;t allow the bootloader to be unlocked, I basically gave up on the idea of using a custom ROM, even one that I&#039;ve customized myself. Sadly, even my Motorola (Moto G Stylus 5G 2021) phone won&#039;t allow the bootloader to be unlocked because it was made for Tracfone.</p><p>That being the case, the Universal Android Debloater seems like my best option:</p><p><strong>Universal Android Debloater</strong><br /><a href="https://xdaforums.com/t/2022-07-03-v0-5-1-universal-android-debloater.4069209/" rel="nofollow"> https://xdaforums.com/t/2022-07-03-v0-5-1-universal-android-debloater.4069209/</a></p><p><strong>Universal Android Debloater Next Generation</strong><br /><a href="https://github.com/Universal-Debloater-Alliance/universal-android-debloater-next-generation" rel="nofollow"> https://github.com/Universal-Debloater-Alliance/universal-android-debloater-next-generation</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (pcalvert)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2025 16:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56692#p56692</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Anyone have familiarity with GrapheneOS?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56682#p56682</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>beware the Magic Smoke!?</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Nah, wrangling angry pixies and sniffing magic smoke is kinda my day-job. Nothing to &quot;beware&quot; of really, just keep one hand in your pocket and a <del>fire extinguisher</del> <del>change of trousers</del> believable excuse handy.</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>Bad Wolves</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Not <em>quite</em> my jam, but close enough for government work. \m/</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (steve_v)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 19:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56682#p56682</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Anyone have familiarity with GrapheneOS?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56672#p56672</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>power and fuses and circuitboards, oh my!...beware the Magic Smoke!?</p><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_smoke" rel="nofollow"> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_smoke</a></p><p>re: ... oh my!</p><p><a href="https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/lions_and_tigers_and_bears,_oh_my" rel="nofollow"> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/lions_and_tigers_and_bears,_oh_my</a></p><p>and to get that earworm out, Bad Wolves tribute covering Cranberries Zombie rip Dolores O&#039;Riordan:</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XaS93WMRQQ" rel="nofollow"> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XaS93WMRQQ</a></p><p>peace out</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (stargate-sg1-cheyenne-mtn)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 12:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56672#p56672</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Anyone have familiarity with GrapheneOS?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56670#p56670</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>They were actually an intentional thing for a bit, back when active power-delivery negotiation specs were still a total mess. </p><p>If devices couldn&#039;t agree on a current limit, they would default to 100mA (which sucked), but there was a dumber standard that pretty much everything understood... <br />Bridging the data pins with a &lt;200ohm resistor indicated a device was a charger that could deliver up to 1500mA, and it saved the manufacturer on both the power-delivery IC and the two extra wires.</p><p>This is supposed to happen inside the power supply/charger rather than a generic-looking cable of course, but Chinese manufacturers aren&#039;t exactly well-known for adhering to spec... So a few &quot;magic&quot; cables that would make your not-entirely-compatible (or just buggy) charger and device settle on an amp or so made it into the wild, as did cables that look like a standard USB cable but aren&#039;t, because they shipped with a charger and it saved a few cents to use normal connectors but only two wires.</p><p>I&#039;ve made such cables myself, they&#039;re kinda handy if you want to get an old phone charger or powerbank to &quot;just gimme power&quot; for not-really-usb purposes (or blow fuses on old motherboards, to be tried only if you like fiddly soldering <img src="https://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /> ).</p><p>All this went away with later USB specs and fast-charging, which mandate active negotiation.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (steve_v)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 10:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56670#p56670</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Anyone have familiarity with GrapheneOS?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56668#p56668</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>re: &quot;charging only&quot; cables</p><p>best guess is when a batch of cables Q.C.ed bad for data at a high-enough failure rate then they magically became &quot;charging-only&quot; cables(ooohhh, specialty item...sigh...argh)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (stargate-sg1-cheyenne-mtn)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 08:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=56668#p56668</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
