<![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / Antix and Debian base]]> https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=723 Sat, 17 Jun 2017 15:32:25 +0000 FluxBB <![CDATA[Re: Antix and Debian base]]> https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2310#p2310 @golinux, thanks fror the links.

]]> Sat, 17 Jun 2017 15:32:25 +0000 https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2310#p2310 <![CDATA[Re: Antix and Debian base]]> https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2309#p2309 Well, MXLinux handles it this way.   So I assume that Antix might be based on that method.  IOW they only install sysvinit according to Debian's method leaving all systemd entanglements present.

You might also find this discussion instructive.

]]> Sat, 17 Jun 2017 15:07:10 +0000 https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2309#p2309 <![CDATA[Antix and Debian base]]> https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2308#p2308 I,m wondering what the method is in Antix for systemd entanglement removal(?) is. They are Debian based and I,m curious how they are handling this.
This is an honest question. Anybody know the answer?

]]> Sat, 17 Jun 2017 14:52:27 +0000 https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2308#p2308