<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=6918&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / New bpo Kernel Upgrade 6.10.11+bpo-amd64 fails to boot]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=6918</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in New bpo Kernel Upgrade 6.10.11+bpo-amd64 fails to boot.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:17:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New bpo Kernel Upgrade 6.10.11+bpo-amd64 fails to boot]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=52980#p52980</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>This turned out to be a bad dkms for a SDR device (software driven radio, which I do not use anymore) &amp; was fixed like this (install following the purge):</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>$ sudo apt purge xtrx-dkms</code></pre></div><p>14 updates made after including new firmware. Seems ok so far.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (alexkemp)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=52980#p52980</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New bpo Kernel Upgrade 6.10.11+bpo-amd64 fails to boot]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=52919#p52919</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>devuan daedalus normal/standard install</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>someone@somewhere:~$ reportbug --version
reportbug 12.0.0+devuan2</code></pre></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (stargate-sg1-cheyenne-mtn)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2024 22:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=52919#p52919</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New bpo Kernel Upgrade 6.10.11+bpo-amd64 fails to boot]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=52914#p52914</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>alexkemp wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... could not find an easy way to do that ...</p></div></blockquote></div><p>You can also do it via email.</p><p>See here: <a href="https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting" rel="nofollow">https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting</a></p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>Sending the bug report via e-mail<br />--- snip ---<br />You can report bugs in Debian by sending an e-mail to submit@bugs.debian.org with a special format described below. reportbug (see above) will properly format the e-mails for you; please use it!<br />--- snip ---</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I guess that as long as it is properly formatted, it will not bounce / be ignored.<br />Maybe just avoid mentioning Devuan ...&#160; 8^°</p><p>Best,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2024 17:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=52914#p52914</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New bpo Kernel Upgrade 6.10.11+bpo-amd64 fails to boot]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=52912#p52912</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I assume that a bug-report here needs to be to Debian. I could not find an easy way to do that (they use an auto-report which expects you to be using Debian). Any advice?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (alexkemp)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2024 12:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=52912#p52912</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New bpo Kernel Upgrade 6.10.11+bpo-amd64 fails to boot]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=52910#p52910</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>A non-booting kernel or broken driver really isn&#039;t a big deal, and frankly I have no idea why people seem to get so flustered by it (see recent Debian drama WRT out-of-tree nvidia driver &quot;completely breaking&quot; <img src="https://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/roll.png" width="15" height="15" alt="roll" /> systems).<br />Pretty much every distro keeps old kernels around (and generates bootloader entries for them) for exactly this scenario. </p><p>Even without that, you can just boot a livecd/usb and set root= appropriately or chroot in. Unless one is silly enough to encrypt / and not keep a record of the key OFC... Or use <span class="bbs">secure</span> retarded-boot, but that&#039;s really a bootloader issue and only makes using live media more annoying.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (steve_v)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2024 11:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=52910#p52910</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New bpo Kernel Upgrade 6.10.11+bpo-amd64 fails to boot]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=52909#p52909</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>steve_v wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Why? You&#039;re running an uncommon driver for uncommon hardware, on a backported kernel.<br />Expect this class of problem with new kernels and out-of-tree drivers.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I&#039;m not certain about the &#039;uncommon hardware&#039; bit, but I accept your sentiments.</p><p>First time this has happened to me. Frightened the shit out of me when I got to the boot screen!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (alexkemp)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2024 11:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=52909#p52909</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New bpo Kernel Upgrade 6.10.11+bpo-amd64 fails to boot]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=52908#p52908</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>xtrx-dkms is <a href="https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/x/xtrx-dkms/xtrx-dkms_0.0.1+git20190320.5ae3a3e-3.6_changelog" rel="nofollow">fixed in sid/ceres/unstable</a>, either wait for somebody to punt it to backports or just <a href="https://wiki.debian.org/SimpleBackportCreation" rel="nofollow">do it yourself</a>.</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>I cannot find anything on the web about this.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>It literally took me longer to write this post than it did to find the information above.</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>Difficult to believe that I am the only one.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Why? You&#039;re running an uncommon driver for uncommon hardware, on a backported kernel. <br />Expect this class of problem with new kernels and out-of-tree drivers.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (steve_v)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2024 03:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=52908#p52908</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New bpo Kernel Upgrade 6.10.11+bpo-amd64 fails to boot]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=52907#p52907</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Installed yesterday Saturday 9 November 2024, although the config file is dated different:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>$ $ la /boot/config-6.10.11+bpo-amd64
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 276562 Oct  3 21:43 /boot/config-6.10.11+bpo-amd64</code></pre></div><p>Error immediately after install whilst (from memory) DKMS module build. Reboot into the new kernel failed &amp; I have to boot from the old kernel. I cannot find anything on the web about this. Difficult to believe that I am the only one.</p><p>Here is the top of the install script output that failed:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>Setting up linux-image-6.10.11+bpo-amd64 (6.10.11-1~bpo12+1) ...
/etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms:
dkms: running auto installation service for kernel 6.10.11+bpo-amd64.
Sign command: /lib/modules/6.10.11+bpo-amd64/build/scripts/sign-file
Signing key: /var/lib/dkms/mok.key
Public certificate (MOK): /var/lib/dkms/mok.pub

Building module:
Cleaning build area...
make -j4 KERNELRELEASE=6.10.11+bpo-amd64 -C /lib/modules/6.10.11+bpo-amd64/build M=/var/lib/dkms/xtrx/0.0.1+git20190320.5ae3a3e-3.2/build.....(bad exit status: 2)
Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 6.10.11+bpo-amd64 (x86_64)
Consult /var/lib/dkms/xtrx/0.0.1+git20190320.5ae3a3e-3.2/build/make.log for more information.
Error! One or more modules failed to install during autoinstall.
Refer to previous errors for more information.
dkms: autoinstall for kernel: 6.10.11+bpo-amd64 failed!
run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms exited with return code 11
dpkg: error processing package linux-image-6.10.11+bpo-amd64 (--configure):
 installed linux-image-6.10.11+bpo-amd64 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1</code></pre></div><p>...and here is the top of the error-log for the xtrx build:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>$ head /var/lib/dkms/xtrx/0.0.1+git20190320.5ae3a3e-3.2/build/make.log
DKMS make.log for xtrx-0.0.1+git20190320.5ae3a3e-3.2 for kernel 6.10.11+bpo-amd64 (x86_64)
Sat  9 Nov 14:45:35 GMT 2024
make: Entering directory &#039;/usr/src/linux-headers-6.10.11+bpo-amd64&#039;
  CC [M]  /var/lib/dkms/xtrx/0.0.1+git20190320.5ae3a3e-3.2/build/xtrx.o
/var/lib/dkms/xtrx/0.0.1+git20190320.5ae3a3e-3.2/build/xtrx.c: In function ‘xtrx_uart_do_tx’:
/var/lib/dkms/xtrx/0.0.1+git20190320.5ae3a3e-3.2/build/xtrx.c:472:28: error: ‘struct uart_state’ has no member named ‘xmit’
  472 |         xmit = &amp;port-&gt;state-&gt;xmit;
      |                            ^~
/var/lib/dkms/xtrx/0.0.1+git20190320.5ae3a3e-3.2/build/xtrx.c:473:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘uart_circ_empty’; did you mean ‘uart_lsr_tx_empty’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  473 |         if (uart_circ_empty(xmit))</code></pre></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (alexkemp)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2024 02:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=52907#p52907</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
