golinux you not understand.. i'm not asking for missing pieces.. i said that i not linked my content to main pages due are in draf and "WIP"

i ask why are stopped and now u answered.. in reestructuration.. but that nothing to do with the work i was doing.. but whatever..

Some of your work may be be salvageable when we can find time to sort it out.  But the effort required may exceed the usefulness of the material.  Currently it is too rough and unpolished to be on the wiki proper for reasons stated elsewhere.

i ask why are stopped and now u answered.. in reestructuration.. but that nothing to do with the work i was doing.. but whatever..

umm if you said do not see deeply, so then do you noted tht are draft and preliminary materials not linked to main page? i also can see much material not well prepared ...

wel in nay case.. well done documentation are very disperse and not consisten

The wiki is in the process of being very thoughtfully restructured.  Right now it is mostly in outline format  with current content moved to more suitable locations.  Eventually all the missing pieces will appear.

wel in nay case.. well done documentation are very disperse and not consisten

you cited degradation in the material.. where?

I did not see or deal with any of that as I only recently started to pay much attention to the wiki.  It was handled by the wiki admin.  But I have seen some of it in the in the versioning and I am still seeing your 'corrections' of "major" to "mayor" here and there.  "Mayor" in English is the title of an elected official who runs a local town/city government.

but i dont care i was only asking.. in any way, its a contribution do what do need with that material...

you cited degradation in the material.. where?

They may or may not be relocated elsewhere.  The technical information would have to be vetted for accuracy.  And language use is often incomprehensible with many spelling and grammatical errors (as is illustrated by your post above).  Without knowing what you are trying to say, it is impossible to edit to clarify.   Your offerings are also peppered with judgmental assessments that have no place in documentation and would need to be removed (as in this post).  To do all of that is a monumental task so will take some time to sort out.  To make matters worse you were editing previous contributions in a negative way by introducing more language errors and 'opinions' which were degrading the wiki content.

For now please keep posting to your website to make that information available.

in debian there a similar site/place, the debian hardware and debian wiki.. i think the friendsofdevuan was a equivalent site.. but know i dannot do more and seems "mandatory rules" taken the site..

what happened with the work that i do and how i continuate, must users made by won appart of the proyect?

Comments, suggestions, criticism welcome.