<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=6622&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / Interesting article on LTS kernels at The Register]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=6622</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Interesting article on LTS kernels at The Register.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 10:39:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Interesting article on LTS kernels at The Register]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=50021#p50021</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><p><a href="https://www.theregister.com/2024/05/21/longterm_supported_distros_kernel_policies/?td=rt-3a" rel="nofollow">Here</a>&#039;s an interesting article by from Liam Proven at The Register.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>Liam Proven @ElReg wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p><strong>Long-term supported distros&#039; kernel policies are all wrong</strong><br />Or so says CIQ, which coincidentally has issues obtaining RHEL&#039;s kernel sources</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Best,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 10:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=50021#p50021</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
