<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=6553&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / [SOLVED] Confusion with libcrypt.so.1]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=6553</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in [SOLVED] Confusion with libcrypt.so.1.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 23:47:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Confusion with libcrypt.so.1]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=49489#p49489</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes! That worked and got it running! In fact I was able to resolve a similar issue with another executable I had that required libstdc++5:i386.</p><p>Thanks a million!<br />Tom</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (tlathm)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 23:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=49489#p49489</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Confusion with libcrypt.so.1]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=49488#p49488</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Well <span class="bbc">apt policy</span> did not show the 32 bit version. Give </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code># apt list libcrypt1 -a </code></pre></div><p> a try.</p><p>Normally the 32bit version cab be installed by:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code># apt install libcrypt1:i386</code></pre></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (rolfie)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 21:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=49488#p49488</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Confusion with libcrypt.so.1]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=49485#p49485</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Odd. I did all the above. What I don&#039;t quite understand is that the &quot;apt upgrade&quot; didn&#039;t update or install anything, and the executable I&#039;m trying to run still can&#039;t find libcrypt.so.1. Here are some outputs:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
i386

apt policy libcrypt1
libcrypt1:
  Installed: 1:4.4.33-2
  Candidate: 1:4.4.33-2
  Version table:
 *** 1:4.4.33-2 500
        500 http://deb.devuan.org/merged daedalus/main amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

dpkg -L libcrypt1
/.
/lib
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypt.so.1.1.0
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/libcrypt1
/usr/share/doc/libcrypt1/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/share/doc/libcrypt1/changelog.gz
/usr/share/doc/libcrypt1/copyright
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypt.so.1</code></pre></div><p>Here&#039;s the ldd output of the executable:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>	linux-gate.so.1 (0xf7edb000)
	libnsl.so.1 =&gt; /lib32/libnsl.so.1 (0xf7eb3000)
	libdl.so.2 =&gt; /lib32/libdl.so.2 (0xf7eae000)
	libm.so.6 =&gt; /lib32/libm.so.6 (0xf7da9000)
	libcrypt.so.1 =&gt; not found
	libutil.so.1 =&gt; /lib32/libutil.so.1 (0xf7da4000)
	libpthread.so.0 =&gt; /lib32/libpthread.so.0 (0xf7d9f000)
	libc.so.6 =&gt; /lib32/libc.so.6 (0xf7a00000)
	/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xf7edd000)</code></pre></div><p>As you can see that&#039;s still not found. Any ideas? Thanks!</p><p>Tom</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (tlathm)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 20:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=49485#p49485</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Confusion with libcrypt.so.1]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=49484#p49484</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! Will give that a try.</p><p>Tom</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (tlathm)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=49484#p49484</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Confusion with libcrypt.so.1]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=49483#p49483</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I guess you are on amd64, a 64-bit system. Your application is a 32 bit application that requires a 32 bit library. You will need to enable i386 as architecture, if you haven&#039;t done so far, and then to install the 32 bit version of libcrypt1. Same procedure as for wine32. </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code># dpkg --add-architecture i386
# apt update
# apt upgrade
# dpkg -print-foreign-architectures
# apt policy libcrypt1</code></pre></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (rolfie)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=49483#p49483</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] Confusion with libcrypt.so.1]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=49482#p49482</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve read all sort of things on this that frankly have my head spinning:</p><p>In Beowulf the libc6-i386 package provided the file /lib32/libcrypt.so.1. In Daedalus libc6-i386 no longer does.</p><p>However in Daedalus, the package libcrypt1 provides libcrypt.so.1, but only at the path /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypt.so.1.</p><p>I&#039;m hoping to use a binary executable that requires that and did work under Beowulf, but nothing I try gets it to work. It just complains that libcrypt.so.1 can&#039;t be found.</p><p>Any clues as to all this? Thanks!<br />Tom</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (tlathm)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=49482#p49482</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
