<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=6349&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / [SOLVED] How will the deprecation of Debian's i386 affect Devuan?]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=6349</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in [SOLVED] How will the deprecation of Debian's i386 affect Devuan?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2024 00:47:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] How will the deprecation of Debian's i386 affect Devuan?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=47336#p47336</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Alright, thank you!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Fierelier)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2024 00:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=47336#p47336</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] How will the deprecation of Debian's i386 affect Devuan?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=47335#p47335</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@Fierelier: yes, the Devuan repository is an &quot;on-the-fly merge&quot; of Debian packages that uses the packages directly from Debian repositories (except for the &quot;forked&quot; packages). I.e., Devuan only maintains and builds forked packages, and relies on Debian doing that for the rest.</p><p>In essence Devuan is simply a re-indexing of which packages are included and where to download them; forked packages from Devuan and all other packages from Debian. Thus, if Debian stops maintaining and building i386 packages, Devuan will follow.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (ralph.ronnquist)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2024 22:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=47335#p47335</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] How will the deprecation of Debian's i386 affect Devuan?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=47332#p47332</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>first impact I thought of it Gaming apps like Steam rely on 32bit arch.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (GlennW)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2024 21:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=47332#p47332</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] How will the deprecation of Debian's i386 affect Devuan?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=47326#p47326</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hendrick, I don&#039;t get any delays when I ssh into my Asus netbook. If you want to try the same system I&#039;m running, here&#039;s a live-iso I made for my EEE. Passwords are root:root and user:user and you&#039;ll need to use startx to get a desktop.<br /><a href="https://get.refracta.org/files/experimental/refracta_12-EEE_lxqt-20230905_1348.iso" rel="nofollow">https://get.refracta.org/files/experime … 5_1348.iso</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2024 19:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=47326#p47326</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] How will the deprecation of Debian's i386 affect Devuan?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=47323#p47323</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve had a Pi 1 as a server for a while, that&#039;s quite a slow device, surely slower than even your netbook, and I didn&#039;t experience that.</p><p>I don&#039;t think your theory is correct. As far as I know, your server doesn&#039;t interact at all with the DNS, when there is a connection incoming. The client contacts the DNS, gets the IP, and then connects to your server using that IP. I don&#039;t think the domain even needs to point to a valid IP at all, for the DNS to route clients there. I am by no means an expert when it comes to these things, though.</p><p>Might be worth to bring up a htop instance, while connecting to it, to see if it&#039;s bottlenecking anywhere. When I do ssh topoi.pooq.com -v, I see your server is slow to process each step, for some reason. Could be full RAM? Really not sure. I&#039;ve had a Pentium III 700mhz with 256MB of RAM react faster to SSH requests.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Fierelier)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2024 17:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=47323#p47323</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] How will the deprecation of Debian's i386 affect Devuan?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=47317#p47317</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I am still actively using a 32-bit intel laptop.&#160; It&#039;s running my stopgap server.&#160; The one this thread was originally about.&#160; It&#039;s an ASUS netbook from 2008 -- the first one that required no proprietary drivers.</p><p>I wonder sometimes if I have the machine correctly configured, but intead might it be too slow to respond to the DNS requests for it to be regarded as authoritative.&#160; Is this remotely plausible?</p><p>It takes me about 20 seconds of wait time to connect to it using<br />&#160; &#160; ssh topoi.pooq.com<br />That&#039;s 20 real-time seconds to get to the shell prompt.&#160; Ten seconds before get to enter a password, and after that another ten seconds to get to the shell prompt.</p><p>-- hendrik</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (hendrikboom3)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=47317#p47317</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] How will the deprecation of Debian's i386 affect Devuan?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=47311#p47311</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>As spoken about in <a href="https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=6266" rel="nofollow">this thread</a>, Debian seems to be looking to discontinue support for x86 machines. I find this choice somewhat questionable, since these machines are quite capable still, in my eyes. I could daily drive my Pentium M 1.2GHz if I needed to, and I have sometimes used that machine for extensive periods of time, exclusively.</p><p>...yet, I&#039;m close to giving up on this platform, I feel like the walls have been moving in for a long time:<br />* Many distros are discontinuing x86<br />* Browsers are all f*cked-up (in general), and ignore my build preferences in some cases, failing to compile without SSE2/SSE3<br />* Clang and Rust use the wrong definitions for i686, breaking some software on non-SSE2 capable machines. No desire from these teams to fix<br />* Software is generally getting worse, with people just jumping on whatever new *shiny* things come out (GTK3/GTK4 are mostly pointless, slow and buggy, yet everyone adapts them)<br />* It&#039;s difficult to run older software on Linux. I&#039;m trying to develop software to resolve this, but right now, things really still feel disconnected between the old and new software spheres</p><p>An old x86 laptop is what truly got me into Linux in the first place. I&#039;ve been working on debloating my entire suite of software, crafting replacements with the limited inspiration I have, for things that I don&#039;t consider good. But it really feels like things are coming to an end, this time.</p><p>I assume Devuan will adapt Debian&#039;s upstream behavior of i386, and also drop it eventually. But I&#039;m still curious to hear, what is the official stance on this?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Fierelier)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=47311#p47311</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
