<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=6171&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / Seriously?]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=6171</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Seriously?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 22:44:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Seriously?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45708#p45708</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>100% @nixer</p><p>I played in the cooker/cauldron/unstable for years without knowing how to use the bug report system properly (for kde and the kernel...Mandriva, Mageia, pclinuxos ).</p><p>But I used the forums a lot at LQ and the host os forums to feel my way.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (GlennW)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 22:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45708#p45708</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Seriously?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45700#p45700</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Oh...</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (The-Amnesiac-Philosopher)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 19:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45700#p45700</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Seriously?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45699#p45699</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hey Amne! If you look back at the &#039;apt policy&#039; output I requested, you&#039;ll see he did use &quot;daedalus&quot; in sources.list. For unstable, it doesn&#039;t matter if you use the codename or not. sid/ceres/unstable is always sid/ceres/unstable. Because it&#039;s always&#160; changing, it&#039;s always the same.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 19:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45699#p45699</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Seriously?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45698#p45698</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>greenjeans wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p> it&#039;s not broken so no need to fix it</p></div></blockquote></div><p><img src="https://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (The-Amnesiac-Philosopher)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 18:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45698#p45698</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Seriously?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45696#p45696</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>aluma wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>In my case the reason was the included repository</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>  deb http://packages.devuan.org/devuan/ unstable main    
  </code></pre></div><p>Disabling it solved the problem.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Uncle aluma,</p><p>Devuan has always recommended...almost insisted...for users to use actual Devuan release names in their sources list instead of the generic names of stable, testing, and unstable.</p><p><img src="https://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (The-Amnesiac-Philosopher)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 18:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45696#p45696</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Seriously?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45690#p45690</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>The-Amnesiac-Philosopher wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>However, I was still frisky back then. I&#039;ve gotten older and cantankerous and just want a stable system now. <img src="https://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/tongue.png" width="15" height="15" alt="tongue" /></p></div></blockquote></div><p>Lol, you and me both. Been running Devuan 1 for 6.5 years now, lol.</p><p>Not long ago had conversation with a guy in the library who was interested in what distro I was running, told him, and he was like OMG why are you running something that old?</p><p>me: Because it works</p><p>him: omg but there&#039;s new stuff</p><p>me: don&#039;t care, it&#039;s not broken so no need to fix it</p><p>him: But things will break</p><p>me: it&#039;s not broken</p><p>him: it will be</p><p>me: IT&#039;S NOT ******* BROKEN!</p><p>LOL! But in all seriousness, 6 and a half years and all machines are still working fine, that&#039;s awesome, one of the reasons I love Devuan, never had an update in those years that broke anything, it all just kept humming right along.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (greenjeans)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 17:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45690#p45690</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Seriously?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45678#p45678</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In my case the reason was the included repository</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>  deb http://packages.devuan.org/devuan/ unstable main    
  </code></pre></div><p>Disabling it solved the problem.<br />Indeed, the libnm0 version in this repository is newer than the installable version of network-manager.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (aluma)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 14:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45678#p45678</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Seriously?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45670#p45670</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>No bug here, we just needed to watch the warnings and wait. Network-manager depends on libnm0 of the same version .. libnm0 was to be upgraded to 1.44.2-5 (at 23-11-22) but it seems network-manager 1.44.2-5 wasn&#039;t available till shortly afterwards. From my log:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>The following packages will be REMOVED:
  network-manager network-manager-gnome

#SNIP

Do you want to continue? [Y/n]</code></pre></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (dzz)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 12:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45670#p45670</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Seriously?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45669#p45669</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>The answer is: fix it yourself (and/or file a bug report), or wait.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>In my humble opinion, this should be promoted as the expected outcome for anyone wishing to venture into the testing/unstable waters.</p><p>Example:&#160; A few days ago an update of nfs-common broke my ability to mount nfs shares.&#160; I waited and no fix has showed up, yet, and I can find no bug report that addresses this.&#160; So, I uninstalled and then reinstalled from excalibur repos.&#160; Then I held the package to current level.&#160; I wish I knew enough to file a helpful bug report, so instead, I will continue waiting.&#160; In the meantime, my ceres is now fully functional, again.<br />If this is not something that excites you, then it would be rough sailing to jump into these waters.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (nixer)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 12:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45669#p45669</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Seriously?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45666#p45666</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>aluma wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>@fsmithred<br />Need to say.<br />This happened on an experimental computer.<br />On the other, where all sorts of extra packets do not fall, everything is fine.</p><p> Regards.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Yeah, mixing stable and unstable is a recipe for problems. A better choice is to mix testing and unstable, and in either case, setting unstable to a lower priority would let you be more selective about which packages come from unstable.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 09:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45666#p45666</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Seriously?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45665#p45665</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>boughtonp wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><div class="quotebox"><cite>fsmithred wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>we got to the fifth post and nobody has yet asked why network-manager got removed?</p></div></blockquote></div><p>If the first post had been an attempt at a bug report, I&#039;m sure more would have been done to encourage diagnosis and sending of the relevant information to <a href="https://bugs.devuan.org" rel="nofollow">bugs.devuan.org</a></p><p>But since it was essentially just a rant just about dropped balls and low bars, I&#039;d say the responses were just right.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Indeed.<br />Had the OP phrased the post as a bug report or request for help, help they likely would have received. Whining about how terrible the distro is because&#160; an update on unstable &quot;Removed internet access&quot; gets... Some ROFL at best.</p><p>I&#039;ll tolerate plenty of complains if a routine update to a <em>stable</em> release causes borkage (particularly if the post includes technical details, as opposed to &quot;$gui_thing got broke because I didn&#039;t read apt output&quot;), hell, sometimes I&#039;ll even join in... <br />But unstable and testing are subject to this kind of dependency screwyness at any time, and that&#039;s kinda the point of having unstable and testing branches to begin with.</p><p>i.e.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>The-Amnesiac-Philosopher wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>One thing that I learned many years ago when running unstable...</p><p>Look at the terminal output before agreeing to an upgrade. If it&#039;s going to remove something that you consider detrimental to your system, tell it n (no). You can then upgrade the other packages individually that aren&#039;t part of the packages that will/would be removed.</p><p>Under normal circumstances, it will be fixed within a few days. Other times, it may take a week or two.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>This^ The answer is: fix it yourself (and/or file a bug report), or wait.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (steve_v)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 09:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45665#p45665</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Seriously?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45663#p45663</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@fsmithred</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>   root@aa:/# apt policy network-manager network-manager-gnome network-manager-tde
network-manager:
  Installed: 1.44.2-3devuan1
  Candidate: 1.44.2-5devuan1
  Version table:
     1.44.2-5devuan1 500
        500 http://packages.devuan.org/devuan unstable/main amd64 Packages
 *** 1.44.2-3devuan1 100
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     1.42.4-1devuan1 500
        500 http://deb.devuan.org/merged daedalus/main amd64 Packages
network-manager-gnome:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 1.30.0-2
  Version table:
     1.30.0-2 500
        500 http://deb.devuan.org/merged daedalus/main amd64 Packages
network-manager-tde:
  Installed: 4:14.1.1-0debian12.0.0+0
  Candidate: 4:14.1.2~pre3-0debian12.0.0+1
  Version table:
     4:14.1.2~pre3-0debian12.0.0+1 500
        500 http://mirror.ppa.trinitydesktop.org/trinity/deb/trinity-sb daedalus/main-r14 amd64 Packages
 *** 4:14.1.1-0debian12.0.0+0 500
        500 http://mirror.ppa.trinitydesktop.org/trinity/deb/trinity-r14.1.x daedalus/main amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
root@aa:/#</code></pre></div><p>Need to say.<br />This happened on an experimental computer.<br />On the other, where all sorts of extra packets do not fall, everything is fine.</p><p> Regards.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (aluma)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 04:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45663#p45663</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Seriously?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45661#p45661</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>One thing that I learned many years ago when running unstable...</p><p>Look at the terminal output before agreeing to an upgrade. If it&#039;s going to remove something that you consider detrimental to your system, tell it n (no). You can then upgrade the other packages individually that aren&#039;t part of the packages that will/would be removed.</p><p>Under normal circumstances, it will be fixed within a few days. Other times, it may take a week or two. I remember one time...not that my memory is that good any longer...but I remember one time...I probably went nearly two or three months before the package was fixed and able to be upgraded.</p><p>During that time, I upgraded all of the other stuff individually.</p><p>However, I was still frisky back then. I&#039;ve gotten older and cantankerous and just want a stable system now. <img src="https://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/tongue.png" width="15" height="15" alt="tongue" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (The-Amnesiac-Philosopher)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 02:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45661#p45661</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Seriously?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45659#p45659</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@aluma</p><p>What do you get if you run this?</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>apt policy network-manager network-manager-gnome network-manager-tde</code></pre></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 01:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45659#p45659</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Seriously?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45652#p45652</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>When I would run apt-get update I kept getting network-manager and libnm0 kept back.&#160; When I tried apt-get dist-upgrade all it wanted to do was remove over 30&#160; packages.</p><p>After getting network-manager and libnm0 kept back for days, I got sick of waiting for a fix to come through.&#160; I experimented and got this to work:</p><p>sudo apt-get install --reinstall libnm0</p><p>This upgraded libnm0, network-manager and removed some other package I did not recognize.</p><p>Everything has been fine since then.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (mknoop)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2023 21:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45652#p45652</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
