<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=5909&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / Devuan without elogind]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=5909</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Devuan without elogind.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2026 09:16:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Devuan without elogind]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62399#p62399</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@steve_v some of its good qualities exist in init programs like s6 or dinit.</p><p>I have in fact heard that was a purpose for s6, to do systemd on a lightweight level.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (zapper)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2026 09:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62399#p62399</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Devuan without elogind]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62395#p62395</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>better to have a piece of systemd as a dependency then the whole damn thing</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Or, ya know, maybe admit that systemd does actually have some good points, and take inspiration and/or code from the things it does well. </p><p>Elogind works, it solves real-world problems, and it arrived at a time when the only alternative (consolekit) was an unmaintained mess nobody wanted to rely on if there was any other choice.</p><p>Now, we have more options. Turnstile and seatd are things, consolekit2 is actively maintained again. The situation might warrant reevaluation, for a number of valid technical reasons... Which &quot;it&#039;s part of systemd, ick, kill it&quot; is decidedly not.</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>BSD and Illumos can use a desktop environment without elogind and this is tremendous.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>BSD and other unixes had no choice, because removing all the linux-isms in [e]logind was arguably more work than fixing consolekit or implementing your own solution.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (steve_v)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2026 08:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62395#p62395</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Devuan without elogind]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62393#p62393</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Still better to have a piece of systemd as a dependency then the whole damn thing.</p><p>I think most on here would agree with that.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (zapper)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2026 08:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62393#p62393</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Devuan without elogind]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62239#p62239</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@steve_v well i have to admit it has to do with gaps because they forked it for some reason and because there was not any alternative...<br />there are some like consolekit2 or turnstile but elogind started from gentoo devs because it was easier to fork this thing rather than creating something new...so this is where that gap comes in</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (rhtoras)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 22:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62239#p62239</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Devuan without elogind]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45756#p45756</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>rhtoras wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>I know elogind is not systemD but comes to fill a gap systemD made.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Elogind is a part of systemd, forked and split out into a standalone daemon. Nothing more, nothing less, and nothing at all to do with &quot;gaps&quot;.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (steve_v)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 03:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45756#p45756</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Devuan without elogind]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45755#p45755</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I tried devuan&#039;s newest stable, its really a tricky thing to deal with.</p><p>I don&#039;t recommend switching to it if you expect to use synaptic without problems.</p><p>Wayland crap gets in the way preventing sudo synaptic.</p><p>Very irritating I must say.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (zapper)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 03:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45755#p45755</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Devuan without elogind]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45748#p45748</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello people. I am skeptical about elogind too. I am not against 100% since sometimes you have to work and some tools use elogind. I know elogind is not systemD but comes to fill a gap systemD made. BSD and Illumos can use a desktop environment without elogind and this is tremendous. I like wm&#039;s and semi desktops (lumina or enlightment fit here) so i mighht give them again a shot to see what&#039;s going on.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (rhtoras)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 00:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45748#p45748</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Devuan without elogind]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44094#p44094</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, hunter0one.</p><p>Yes, I have been reading occasional blurbs about turnstile, and am hopeful regarding projects of that type.</p><p>I am certainly no IT expert, but I do have a lot of experience with Windows (required at my job) and with Linux OSes.&#160; I have always felt more comfortable with Linux because its workings have traditionally been more understandable, providing me with less troubles and - when occasionally needed - relatively easy fixes, or alternatives.&#160; </p><p>Unfortunately, over the past few years, it seems that the majority of Linux distros are becoming in many ways more and more like Windows -- that is, I have less and less options, the system seems convoluted and almost incomprehensible to a nonprofessional, and problem solving is more frequent and more difficult.&#160; I understand that many professionals are pleased with the continuing integration of services within Linux, but for an amateur user like me, it brings back bad memories of trying to live with the Windows registry, complex update system, and so on.&#160; One false move and I&#039;m cooked.</p><p>I very much appreciate the enormous task being done by developers at antiX, Devuan, Void, PCLOS, Hyperbola, and others.&#160; It certainly seems a huge mountain to climb.&#160; Perhaps some collusion might be in order, despite some basic differences in the approaches being taken.</p><p>Thanks, again, for sharing your observations.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Iggy64)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 01:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44094#p44094</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Devuan without elogind]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44090#p44090</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi again Iggy64. I know more about PCLOS than AntiX, though I&#039;ve tried both because <a href="https://sysdfree.wordpress.com/2023/03/02/363/" rel="nofollow">they make this list</a>. They are both great fully systemd-free options, though I will say PCLOS is definitely not server oriented (also has a problem with dependency hell) and both add quite a lot of &quot;bling&quot; when I enjoy having most things shipped plain and vanilla. This is the main reason I&#039;ve stuck with Devuan despite elogind being needed still if you want some convenience (things like automount or a trash can) like me.</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>It is asking a lot to work around elogind, as it has tentacles in so many key areas.&#160; I was therefore surprised and excited to see the release notes for Daedalus mention the possiblity of avoiding elogind.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Agreed. PCLOS uses consolekit2 in place of elogind so that KDE, MATE, and Xfce work as intended but it sometimes requires heavy patches. For operating systems like FreeBSD, this is their only option when seat management is needed, but FBSD has far more port maintainers willing to make it happen. I can&#039;t blame the Devuan maintainers for not going any further than they have already, it takes baby steps with the kind of manpower they have. I unfortunately have no clue how to do Debian packaging, despite using Debian-based distros almost my entire time on Linux, or I would investigate making drop-in packages for elogind-dependent ones. :-)</p><p>Alternatively things like <a href="https://github.com/chimera-linux/turnstile" rel="nofollow">turnstile</a> might make patching unnecessary in the future.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (hunter0one)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 23:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44090#p44090</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Devuan without elogind]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44087#p44087</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I am the OP in this thread.&#160; I appreciate all the feedback, as it broadens my knowledge on this issue.&#160; Unfortunately, while I am a long-time Linux user, I am not knowledgeable enough to pinpoint how antiX manages to run beautifully with no trace of systemd (init) or elogind (seat mgmt, networking, device mgmt, etc.).&#160; I suspect there are two key areas that are involved:</p><p>1) antiX does not use a full-blown desktop environment like Plasma or Xfce.&#160; Instead, it gives you three window-manager options.&#160; I use IceWM, and have found it easy to learn, easy to customize, and capable to meet all my needs.&#160; I experimented with PCLOS, which also avoids elogind; but it uses Xfce, Mate, or Plasma.&#160; I found that X would not run under Xfce unless Pulseaudio is installed.&#160; I had more luck running Mate with plain ALSA, but had no way to pre-amp the sound for laptop speakers (ALSA plugin not available).&#160; Anyway, I&#039;m guessing that using a WM instead of a full-blown DE makes it easier to get around elogind.</p><p>2) Also, antiX has its own &quot;nosystemd&quot; repository (in addition to the Debian repos)<br />(http://mirrors.rit.edu/mxlinux/mx-packages/antix/bullseye bullseye/nosystemd amd64 Packages)<br />which reflects a tremendous amount of work by the lead developer in avoiding the complexities of systemd and its components.</p><p>I am very happy running antiX on my machines, whether ancient or squeaky new.&#160; At boot, my ancient laptop is idling at around 150MB and is wicked fast.&#160; And I use it on my newer boxes because it is so fast, flexible, and community sourced.</p><p>I always like to have a backup plan, though.&#160; Devuan has been very reliable on one of my desktop boxes, and I hope the distro becomes increasingly successful.&#160; The absence of the init from systemd is a real plus, but elogind seems to be the lion&#039;s share of systemd; so Devuan is not completely good old modular, flexible, economical Linux (yet).&#160; It is asking a lot to work around elogind, as it has tentacles in so many key areas.&#160; I was therefore surprised and excited to see the release notes for Daedalus mention the possiblity of avoiding elogind.&#160; &#160;</p><p>Based on comments in this thread, it sounds like it will take some experimenting.&#160; I&#039;m going to try freeing up another machine for that purpose.&#160; </p><p>Should anyone discover further clues, I would very much welcome their addition to this thread.</p><p>Thanks, again, for your responses.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Iggy64)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 22:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44087#p44087</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Devuan without elogind]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44067#p44067</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In a fresh install of Daedalus with no desktop i installed:<br />$ sudo apt-get install elogind-&#160; seatd sway<br />$ sway<br />XDG_RUNTIME_DIR is not set in the enviroment , aborting.</p><p>$ ps -aux | grep seatd<br />root&#160; - - - -&#160; /usr/sbin/seatd -g video</p><p>$ id <br />... (sudo) .. (video) ..</p><p>Strange.. but after installing :libpam-ck-connector&#160; i saw some progress.<br />I say &#039;strange&#039; because i have not a clue what that package does..</p><p>Ok after also installing firmware-amd-graphics , i can start by $ sway</p><p>Now although sway runs ok when ever i try to install a file manager like pcmanfm , pcmanfm-qt, thunar , dolphin <br />i get &#039;libpam-ck-connector &#039; will be removed. And when that happens sway wont start.</p><p>I also installed &#039;greetd&#039; but i dont know how to start the login gui screen.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (chomwitt)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 22:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44067#p44067</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Devuan without elogind]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44066#p44066</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>This is a cross post, the removal of elogind made this system unusable.</p><p>But, I have tested the new Devuan 5.0 desktop-install iso and it worked perfectly.</p><p>:-)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (GlennW)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 21:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44066#p44066</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Devuan without elogind]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44062#p44062</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Trying to install <span class="bbc">dummy-logind</span> conflicts with <span class="bbc">libpam-ck-connector</span>, even on Xfce which should be the easiest conversion. It also removes a lot of things that it could potentially keep.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (hunter0one)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 14:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44062#p44062</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Devuan without elogind]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44051#p44051</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I tried to install my way back to a reasonable media system... </p><p>I re-installed elogind and rebooted &amp; everything is back...<br />I can use synaptic package manager (required a password dialog, at least)<br />I have sounds<br />I have all the restart and shutdown buttons (so I don&#039;t have to logout and ctrl+alt+del to restart)</p><p>I will try again next time I have a clean install.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (GlennW)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2023 20:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44051#p44051</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Devuan without elogind]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44033#p44033</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Note that if you don&#039;t install the daemonless &quot;build&quot; of Logind from the official repositories, this will cripple Polkit (e.g. Pkexec) and restrict your Xfce&#039;s session management (you&#039;d only be able to log out). As well, NetworkManager will have to be replaced with Connman. All your KDE packages will be gone.</p><p>First thing is to install <span class="bbc">dummy-logind</span> (prevents most of the packages from being removed), <span class="bbc">consolekit</span>, <span class="bbc">seatd</span>, <span class="bbc">libck-connector0</span>, <span class="bbc">libpolkit-gobject-consolekit-1-0</span>, <span class="bbc">udevil</span> (for user-level drive mounting without authentication, with <span class="bbc">devmon</span> as the daemon you have to execute), and <span class="bbc">lxqt-sudo</span> (for authentication).</p><p>Afterwards, you&#039;ll have to look for your packages&#039; binary files that call upon Pkexec to some extent (e.g. Synaptic, Gufw, Timeshift, GSmartControl, GParted) and replace them all with LXQt&#039;s version. It&#039;s also a good idea to adjust your Polkit rules in <span class="bbc">/usr/share/polkit-1/</span>.</p><p>If you start your Xfce session with Startx, then change your Xinit configuration file used to <span class="bbc">exec startxfce4 --with-ck-launch</span>.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (brocashelm)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2023 05:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44033#p44033</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
