<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=5812&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / riscv64 is now an official Debian architecture... what about Devuan?]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=5812</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in riscv64 is now an official Debian architecture... what about Devuan?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 09:44:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[riscv64 is now an official Debian architecture... what about Devuan?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=43026#p43026</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>&quot;riscv64 is now an official architecture&quot;<br /><a href="https://lists.debian.org/debian-riscv/2023/07/msg00053.html" rel="nofollow">https://lists.debian.org/debian-riscv/2 … 00053.html</a></p><p>So, they&#039;re not actually done with making that many packages available, and I don&#039;t quite understand what it means to &quot;rebootstrap the port&quot;. But - I did want to ask if there are plans to expand the set of supported architectures, particularly to riscv64.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (einpoklum)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 09:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=43026#p43026</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
