If so, yeah probably...
]]>Ian Bremmer and Mustafa Suleyman on the Race to Regulate AI
08.16.2023: Ian Bremmer and Mustafa Suleyman believe international cooperation is the key to managing artificial intelligence. Together they’ve analyzed the AI power paradox for the U.S. Department for Foreign Affairs magazine, and they join Walter Isaacson to discuss why countries and technology companies need to come together on AI regulation
Popcorn anyone?
]]>LU344928 wrote:Not imagining - simply my experience.
More like your interpretation of incoming data which humans tend to distort with their emotional prejudices. That is what makes us human and it is a fatal design flaw!
By experience I mean I've heard quite a few express that view.
]]>Freespoke is very good. Been using it for a month or so and it finds stuff others don't. Also, LibRedirect is a useful extension: https://libredirect.github.io/
In the video below, Max Igan tells pretty much the same story as Catherine Austin Fitts. Fitts' strength is financial whereas Igan's is highlighting specific events with common sense.
Holodomor 2.0 The Rebirth of Bolshevism
July 6, 2022
1:16:30
https://odysee.com/@thecrowhouse:2/Holo … lshevism:c
Thankfully, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich has actually been doing something about what's going on:
Gates, Fauci, and Daszak charged with Genocide in Court Filing
Dec 20, 2021
https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion … 063ed.html
He got shot down by 'legalities' in several countries and is now beginning another suit in New Zealand:
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: Breaking! Crimes Against Humanity Trials Begin! (Video)
June 3, 2023
37:24
https://zeeemedia.com/interview/dr-rein … w-zealand/
No surprise Fitts's damning reports, Fuellmich's suits, Igan's highlights and many others have been ignored by MSM. Maybe AI has had those 'fact check' algorithms in searches for years?
]]>Perhaps the AI 'bias' (lying) is to facilitate the perspective below?
Planet Lockdown
Catherine Austin Fitts Interview
Dec 29, 2020
NOTE: video was banned on facebook and youtube in Feb 2021 after 20+M views
48:28
https://odysee.com/@VideosBannedFromYou … Lockdown:f
Thank you, thank you, thank you. That is the best interview of Catherine Austin Fitts that I have ever watched.
Here is another great interview that is more recent:
Financial System - Lawless Criminal Control Syndicate – Catherine Austin Fitts
https://rumble.com/v1e7l4f-financial-sy … fitts.html
Professor Simon Holland
A.I. FAKE Story ! - Prof Simon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcN31V--3rM
The text was slightly updated too (timestamp currently Sat 3 Jun 2023 00.44 BST):
The Guardian
US colonel retracts comments on simulated drone attack ‘thought experiment’
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 … ling-pilot
2¢: It's just a question of when...
]]>I have seen my share of philosophical beliefs, but there being a matrix underneath everything, for me is amazingly not the one I consider the craziest.
The one I consider the nuttiest is simple:
You die, your mind and consciousness disappear into nowhere and become nothing. That would be the viewpoint I find the absolute most insane.
Btw, I should probably clarify something, humans cannot on their own find true peace. We seek peace and also seek conflict. A few people seek peace more than conflict but they seem to be less common.
This dilemma is mentioned by a well known villain from a well known anime called Naruto Shippuden. If you don't know who I am talking about, look up Madara Uchiha. So many villains on that show are bonkers. More than a few loose screws... xD
I personally think most humans do strive for some form of peace, but it becomes so difficult, that many give up. That's just me though.
]]> The Guardian
US air force denies running simulation in which AI drone ‘killed’ operator
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 … lated-test
Or if you prefer it animated:
Prof Simon
First Time A.I. Kills a Human in a Sim
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4xgjo-S-DE
Sure such a simulation had to show up somewhen.
Not surprised I am.
I saw a short clip from a recent Elon Musk interview. In it, he mentioned that AI is already being taught to lie.
Standardpoodle wrote:What really happens is one thing. How it is marketed is another.
I agree. And it's not only how it is marketed but also when it's marketed.
Google started road testing AI over a decade ago, so I'm guessing development began a decade or more earlier.
Project Chauffeur ran for almost two years undetected, road testing with seven vehicles before the New York Times revealed their existence on October 9, 2010.
As for Musk...
All you have to do is think. Using Elon Musk as an example, the man appeared to come from literally nowhere and yet suddenly “owns” the world’s largest auto manufacturer. Musk at the same time began an aggressive program of launching tens of thousands of communications satellites, and then SpaceX, “Elon Musk’s private spaceflight company”, the maker of the Starship, planning International Space Station missions, no less. Then we have Musk buying Twitter for $44 billion.
In the last 100 years, anyone attempting to create a new auto company and brand has met with disaster, but Musk apparently experienced not a hiccup with the Tesla that is suddenly a world favorite. This would have required perhaps ten years of planning and design, the planning of factories and production, the creation of supply lines, the testing and certification, and so much more, but with Tesla this apparently all occurred overnight in a vacuum. Are we to believe Elon Musk designed the Tesla? There is no evidence Musk has the ability to design even a dipstick, much less an entire car, so how did all this occur and what was the source of the background billions required to bring this project to fruition? Musk played no part in the creation of the Tesla. He just somehow showed up at the end, “owning” the company.
Similarly, the aggressive program of communication satellites that “Elon Musk” has launched; this as well would require many years of planning and design, to say nothing of arranging the launch facilities and obtaining the necessary thousands of paying customers. This again would require years and billions of dollars in financing but, like Bezos’ space flight program, this one suddenly appeared in full bloom, operating, launched, and ready to go. Who did the planning for this? It certainly wasn’t Musk, so who was behind it? And the money for all this came from where? “Musk’s” Tesla has never made a profit, so where would he obtain the billions for a pie-in-the-sky system of tens of thousands of communications satellites? Nothing like this can happen without a decade or more of intensive planning and an enormous investment, and obviously none of that came from Musk.
These would be enough challenge for any man, but then we had “Elon Musk” buying Twitter for $44 billion. How would that happen? We are told that Musk suddenly has wealth of – vaguely – $200 billion, with no detail, but presumably from stock holdings in “his” Tesla. But are we to assume that Musk has an extra $44 billion in loose cash sitting in the bank to purchase Twitter? That’s not possible, and Musk isn’t selling half his interest in Tesla shares to finance it, so what is the source of the money? The media confuse this by providing only a few sound bytes but no detail, and thus we have thoughts loosely in our minds that Musk is very wealthy and could somehow afford to purchase Twitter, but all we need to do is think to realise that is impossible.
The Richest Man in the World
November 21, 2022
21,000 Words
https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/the-riche … the-world/
Five minutes of details:
The Real Elon Musk
2023-05-18
4:51
https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=MR1GD3WASDK8
Musk is a popular talking head, yet a distraction, as is ChatGPT and much of what's in the daily headlines. The major search engines are already using AI, and a search for 'ai test shows bias' can find lots of articles going back years. Perhaps the AI 'bias' (lying) is to facilitate the perspective below?
Planet Lockdown
Catherine Austin Fitts Interview
Dec 29, 2020
NOTE: video was banned on facebook and youtube in Feb 2021 after 20+M views
48:28
https://odysee.com/@VideosBannedFromYou … Lockdown:f
Not imagining - simply my experience.
More like your interpretation of incoming data which humans tend to distort with their emotional prejudices. That is what makes us human and it is a fatal design flaw!
]]>Do you have some kind of emotional attachment to AI or Simulation Theory?
Like I said, 'Not that I'm saying I accept it, but I do find it interesting'
If not, then why do you imagine and insinuate that those who have different ideas are motivated by strong emotions?
Not imagining - simply my experience.
]]>Firstly, to anyone who tends to deride AI by claiming it can never equal human intelligence, if you subscribe to the Simulation Theory (or argument, as its author calls it) then we humans could very well be AI.
Do you have some kind of emotional attachment to AI or Simulation Theory? If not, then why do you imagine and insinuate that those who have different ideas are motivated by strong emotions? Such as derision. There is simply, plainly, obviously no reason to believe that any AI running in today's computers could do anything but remain artificial.
]]>I am aware that humans are unable to have true peace
If you accept the above theory then that's part of the plan. Humans are programmed not to strive for peace.
Lets face it, if you're outside looking in, which is what Simulation Theory is fundamentally about, then peace is boring whereas conflict is interesting.
Of course the corollary, and irony, of this means that if peace breaks out over the entire world, that would indeed spell the end of this very world.
Or if not the actual end, then the director(s) of the simulation could rewind it and start again from a certain point.
]]>zapper wrote:golinux wrote:@chris2be8 . . . Thanks for the great description. Found it . . . I think . . .
Which one is it? Just curious
The one I'm referring to was in issue 269, so it should be number 109 (number 099 was in issue 259). But that site won't show it.
I have a nasty suspicion you can't see the cartoons in the last year (you probably need a subscription). Sorry.
Well that is what corporations tend to do, be greedy as hell.
Not shocked aka.
]]>golinux wrote:@chris2be8 . . . Thanks for the great description. Found it . . . I think . . .
Which one is it? Just curious
The one I'm referring to was in issue 269, so it should be number 109 (number 099 was in issue 259). But that site won't show it.
I have a nasty suspicion you can't see the cartoons in the last year (you probably need a subscription). Sorry.
]]>