<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=4948&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / [SOLVED] Backported kernel update]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=4948</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in [SOLVED] Backported kernel update.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2022 18:39:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Backported kernel update]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35322#p35322</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>rolfie wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... why I don&#039;t use NVidea at all.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>The pair of cards were at a really great price.<br />Impossible to pass up or resist, for that matter.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>rolfie wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... run a setup for your drivers that builds the modules.<br />... need the headers for the new kernel ...<br />... need them for building the VBox kernel modules.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Yes.<br />I saw from the terminal that the VM that runs pihole was not up and the printout when atempting to run <span class="bbc">/sbin/vboxconfig</span> put me up to speed.<br />Much <em>more</em> verbose in that respect than the nvidia drivers.&#160; 8^/</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>rolfie wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... a manual process.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Sure.<br />Like installing a backported kernel.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>rolfie wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Try that:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code># apt -t beowulf-backports install linux-headers-amd64</code></pre></div></div></blockquote></div><p>Done.<br />Booted into my SLiM log-it as always. </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>groucho@devuan:~$ uname -a
Linux devuan 5.10.0-0.bpo.11-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 (2022-02-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux
groucho@devuan:~$ </code></pre></div><p>Apparently everything runs as it should.<br />There may be a problem with the <span class="bbc">wicd</span> daemon not starting right away, I&#039;ll have to look into that.</p><p>Thanks a lot for your input.</p><p>Best,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2022 18:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35322#p35322</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Backported kernel update]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35320#p35320</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>SCNR: Thats why I don&#039;t use NVidea at all.</p><p>Well, maybe you need to run a setup for your drivers that builds the modules. And you probably also need the headers for the new kernel to do that. I know that I need them for building the VBox kernel modules. Also a manual process.</p><p>Try that:<br /># apt -t beowulf-backports install linux-headers-amd64</p><p>rolfie</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (rolfie)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2022 17:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35320#p35320</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Backported kernel update]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35318#p35318</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>rolfie wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Run the previously posted command, that will&#160; do the job.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Done.<br />But the system does not find the nvidia driver module so I cannot get a desktop.<br />Just command line.</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>X.Org X Server 1.20.4
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
[    63.984] Build Operating System: Linux 5.10.0-10-amd64 x86_64 Debian
[    63.985] Current Operating System: Linux devuan 5.10.0-0.bpo.11-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 (2022-02-03) x86_64
--- snip ---
[    64.025] (EE) NVIDIA: Failed to initialize the NVIDIA kernel module. Please see the
[    64.025] (EE) NVIDIA:     system&#039;s kernel log for additional error messages and
[    64.025] (EE) NVIDIA:     consult the NVIDIA README for details.</code></pre></div><p>Makes sense that it cannot find it.<br />ie: whereas there <em>are</em> 340xx modules in <span class="bbc">/lib/modules/5.10.0-0.bpo.3-amd64/updates/dkms</span> ...</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>~$ locate 340xx
--- snip ---
/lib/modules/5.10.0-0.bpo.3-amd64/updates/dkms/nvidia-legacy-340xx-uvm.ko
/lib/modules/5.10.0-0.bpo.3-amd64/updates/dkms/nvidia-legacy-340xx.ko
--- snip ---</code></pre></div><p>... there is no <span class="bbc">/updates</span> or <span class="bbc">/updates/dkms</span> directory in <span class="bbc">/lib/modules/5.10.0-0.bpo.11-amd64</span></p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>~$ ls /lib/modules/5.10.0-0.bpo.11-amd64
kernel         modules.alias.bin  modules.builtin.bin      modules.dep      modules.devname  modules.softdep  modules.symbols.bin
modules.alias  modules.builtin    modules.builtin.modinfo  modules.dep.bin  modules.order    modules.symbols
~$ </code></pre></div><p>I did find this one via <span class="bbc">apt list</span> but it is the one I have installed:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>~$ apt list | grep nvidia-legacy-340xx | grep dkms
--- snip ---
nvidia-legacy-340xx-kernel-dkms/oldstable-backports,now 340.108-10~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed]
--- snip ---
~$</code></pre></div><p>System&#039;s working with the previous version so it&#039;s not a serious problem.<br />But I don&#039;t get what has happened.</p><p>Thanks in advance.</p><p>Best,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2022 16:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35318#p35318</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Backported kernel update]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35314#p35314</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Altoid wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>How can I get this done?</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Run the previously posted command, that will&#160; do the job. </p><p>rolfie</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (rolfie)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2022 13:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35314#p35314</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Backported kernel update]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35312#p35312</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>rolfie wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Besides the backports kernel you may also install the backports metapackage.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I see ...<br />Sort of.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>rolfie wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... you will lose the updates of the main kernel packages ...<br />... get the updates from backports.</p></div></blockquote></div><div class="quotebox"><cite>rolfie wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>I am using backports headers and images only, my Chimaera is running now with 5.16.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>It would seem, if I understand correctly, that you have with your <span class="bbc">Chimaera</span>) installation what I want to have with my <span class="bbc">Beowulf</span> installation.</p><p>ie: <span class="bbc">Beowulf</span> with a an up-to-date 5.10 backported kernel<br />Eventually, a couple of (or all, don&#039;t know yet) backported applications.</p><p>Not <span class="bbc">Chimaera</span> because of the reasons posted previously.</p><p>How can I get this done?</p><p>Thanks in advance.</p><p>Best,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2022 11:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35312#p35312</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Backported kernel update]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35311#p35311</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>fsmithred wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>There&#039;s no metapackage for backports kernels like there is for the main kernel. The only updates you would get would be if the kernel version didn&#039;t change. ...</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I fear that is not 100% true. Besides the backports kernel you may also install the backports metapackage. In case of Beowulf:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code># apt -t beowulf-backports install linux-image-amd64</code></pre></div><p>Then you will lose the updates of the main kernel packages, but get the updates from backports. You can&#039;t have both. This way you get the signed versions of the backports kernels.</p><p>I am using backports headers and kernels only, my Chimaera is running now with 5.16.</p><p>rolfie</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (rolfie)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2022 11:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35311#p35311</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Backported kernel update]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35305#p35305</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>GlennW wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... use the bpo kernel.<br />... search for upgrades for it, linux-image... <br />... grab the kernel headers packages too.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I see.</p><p>apt says this:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>groucho@devuan:~$ apt list | grep linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo | grep -i amd64/oldstable 
--- snip ---
linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.11-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.11-cloud-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.11-rt-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.9-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.70-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.9-cloud-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.70-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.9-rt-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.70-1~bpo10+1 amd64
groucho@devuan:~$ </code></pre></div><p>and this:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>groucho@devuan:~$ apt list | grep linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo | grep -i amd64/oldstable 
--- snip ---
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.11-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.11-cloud-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.11-rt-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.12-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.103-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.12-cloud-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.103-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.12-rt-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.103-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.9-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.70-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.9-cloud-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.70-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.9-rt-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.70-1~bpo10+1 amd64
groucho@devuan:~$ </code></pre></div><p>This is what I have installed:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>~$ apt list | grep linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo | grep -i amd64 | grep installed
--- snip ---
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.3-amd64/now 5.10.13-1~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed,local]
~$ </code></pre></div><div class="codebox"><pre><code>~$ apt list | grep linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo | grep -i amd64 | grep installed
--- snip ---
linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.3-amd64/now 5.10.13-1~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed,local]
~$ </code></pre></div><p>So ...</p><p>I just do <span class="bbc">apt install linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.12-amd64</span>?<br />I&#039;m assuming the matching linux-image gets dragged along although it seems it is unsigned:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>~$ apt list | grep linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.12-amd64
--- snip ---
linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.12-amd64-dbg/oldstable-backports 5.10.103-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.12-amd64-unsigned/oldstable-backports 5.10.103-1~bpo10+1 amd64    &lt;-------------
~$ </code></pre></div><p>Thanks in advance.</p><p>Best,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2022 01:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35305#p35305</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Backported kernel update]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35303#p35303</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I also use the bpo kernel.</p><p>Generally I have to search for upgrades for it, linux-image... and if found grab the kernel headers packages too.</p><p>Currently, </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>glenn@GlennsPref ~ $ uname -a
Linux GlennsPref.net 5.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT Debian 5.16.12-1~bpo11+1 (2022-03-08) x86_64 GNU/Linux</code></pre></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (GlennW)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2022 23:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35303#p35303</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Backported kernel update]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35302#p35302</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>alphalpha wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>why not use the standard kernel?</p></div></blockquote></div><p>First there&#039;s the issue of the <span class="bbc">nvidia-legacy-340xx</span> drivers and then the demise of <span class="bbc">python 2.7.18</span>.<br />There are a couple of applications that will not work in <span class="bbc">chimaera</span>, which is why I use the backported kernel.</p><p>Thanks for your input.</p><p>Best,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2022 22:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35302#p35302</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Backported kernel update]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35301#p35301</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>fsmithred wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... no metapackage for backports kernels ...</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I&#039;ll take your word for it.<br />No idea what that does.&#160; 8^/ </p><div class="quotebox"><cite>fsmithred wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... only updates you would get would be if the kernel version didn&#039;t change.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I found out about this by chance while skimming through the <span class="bbc">synaptic</span> lists, which I do every so often.<br />Otherwise I have become used to <span class="bbc">apt</span> for updating and installing.</p><p>Maybe it is because the backported kernel was installed locally?</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>groucho@devuan:~$ apt list | grep linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo | grep installed
--- snip ---
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.3-amd64/now 5.10.13-1~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed,local]
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.3-common/now 5.10.13-1~bpo10+1 all [installed,local]
groucho@devuan:~$ </code></pre></div><div class="codebox"><pre><code>groucho@devuan:~$ apt list | grep linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo | grep -i amd64
--- snip ---
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.11-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.11-cloud-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.11-rt-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.12-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.103-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.12-cloud-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.103-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.12-rt-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.103-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.3-amd64/now 5.10.13-1~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed,local]     &lt;--------------------
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.9-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.70-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.9-cloud-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.70-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.9-rt-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.70-1~bpo10+1 amd64
groucho@devuan:~$ </code></pre></div><p>Thanks in advance.</p><p>Best,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2022 22:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35301#p35301</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Backported kernel update]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35300#p35300</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>why not use the standard kernel?</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>sudo apt install -t chimaera linux-image-amd64</code></pre></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (alphalpha)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2022 22:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35300#p35300</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Backported kernel update]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35299#p35299</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>There&#039;s no metapackage for backports kernels like there is for the main kernel. The only updates you would get would be if the kernel version didn&#039;t change. I don&#039;t know if that happens with backports kernels.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2022 21:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35299#p35299</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] Backported kernel update]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35295#p35295</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><p>My Devuan Beowulf runs on a backported kernel:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>~$ uname -a
Linux devuan 5.10.0-0.bpo.3-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.13-1~bpo10+1 (2021-02-11) x86_64 GNU/Linux
groucho@devuan:~$ </code></pre></div><p>When I installed it I assumed it would be updated as it evolved, but I have just noted that it has not.<br />And that the latest version is <span class="bbc">5.10.0-0.bpo.12-amd64</span>.</p><p>I think I may omitted something when I installed it?<br />Some priority setting perhaps?</p><p>Please advise, don&#039;t want to screw up something.</p><p>Thanks in advance,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2022 21:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35295#p35295</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
