<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=4623&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / Devuan, udev, eudev, systemd.udev where are we now ?]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=4623</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Devuan, udev, eudev, systemd.udev where are we now ?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 18:41:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Devuan, udev, eudev, systemd.udev where are we now ?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=32471#p32471</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>hoopdriver wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Reading round it seems that systemd.udev wasn&#039;t just appropriated by the systemd team, they also re-worked it and improved it so it performs better and isn&#039;t as tightly coupled with systemd as expected so can be used without systemd.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I would never trust that generosity of co-existence coming from LP et al/Red Hat.</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>It may be that LP, KS &amp; GKH are there to help :-)</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Themselves and their &quot;product&quot; for sure. They have never once offered an option of compromise or collaboration.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (golinux)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 18:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=32471#p32471</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Devuan, udev, eudev, systemd.udev where are we now ?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=32469#p32469</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Wow - thanks for that.&#160; It would have been nice to find the project myself but there seems to be a bit of a black hole for it.&#160; I spent a few hours looking around on various search engines and the Gentoo forums but couldn&#039;t find any reference to eudev continuation - it seemed as if Gentoo had decided that eudev was dead and there was no need for anything other than systemd.udev.</p><p>Reading round it seems that systemd.udev wasn&#039;t just appropriated by the systemd team, they also re-worked it and improved it so it performs better and isn&#039;t as tightly coupled with systemd as expected so can be used without systemd.</p><p>It may be that LP, KS &amp; GKH are there to help :-)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (hoopdriver)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 18:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=32469#p32469</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Devuan, udev, eudev, systemd.udev where are we now ?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=32467#p32467</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>FYI there is a <span class="bbu"><a href="https://github.com/eudev-project/" rel="nofollow">collaborative project working on eudev</a></span> including bb|hcb from Devuan and skarnet as well as Alpine devs.</p><p>OMG! Lennart and Kay Seivers and GKH are hanging out there too!!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (golinux)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 15:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=32467#p32467</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Devuan, udev, eudev, systemd.udev where are we now ?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=32464#p32464</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Alpine are packaging <a href="https://github.com/illiliti/libudev-zero/" rel="nofollow">libudev-zero</a> for use with busybox&#039;s mdev but there doesn&#039;t seem to be a Debian package for it.</p><p>EDIT: looking at the missing features though I think Devuan should go with systemd-udev plus the openembedded patches <em>*dives for cover*</em></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Head_on_a_Stick)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 14:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=32464#p32464</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Devuan, udev, eudev, systemd.udev where are we now ?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=32461#p32461</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I stupidly upgraded my Mint desktop a few weeks ago and have regretted it since.</p><p>I started looking round for alternatives and in the process stumbled on the problem with udev.&#160; It was absorbed into systemd a few years ago and this caused a bit of froth so those nice people at Gentoo decided to do eudev... and the world was rosy.</p><p>Earlier this year, Gentoo announced eudev was being dropped and they were going to use systemd.udev and I understand the reasoning behind this.</p><p>What I&#039;m trying to work out is how eudev being dropped by Gentoo is going to affect all the other distributions that have been using it.&#160; There are other *dev options out there but systemd.udev does seem to be gaining traction.</p><p>I can&#039;t find anything on this forum regarding the situation, can somebody enlighten me ?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (hoopdriver)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=32461#p32461</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
