<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=3982&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / Testing for beowulf 3.1 point release]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=3982</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Testing for beowulf 3.1 point release.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:48:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Testing for beowulf 3.1 point release]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26258#p26258</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>fsmithred,<br />thank you for your answer.<br />Again, I only had the problem with the live-iso (refracta installer) the first time.<br />The machine is a Dell Optiplex GX780, a BIOS/MBR machine.<br />A Windows 7 is installed on it, and a lot of free space for Linux is availble.</p><p>Layout /dev/sda: (Disklabel DOS )<br />/dev/sda1&#160; &#160; 100M&#160; &#160; ntfs&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; System reserved<br />/dev/sda2&#160; &#160; 100G&#160; &#160; ntfs&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Windows7</p><p>I booted the mentioned live-iso and performed the installation.</p><p>Layout /dev/sda: (Disklabel DOS)<br />/dev/sda1&#160; &#160; 100M&#160; &#160; ntfs&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; System reserved<br />/dev/sda2&#160; &#160; 100G&#160; &#160; ntfs&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Windows7<br />/dev/sda3&#160; &#160; 1G&#160; &#160;&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;ext3&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; /boot<br />/dev/sda4&#160; &#160; extended&#160; &#160; <br />/dev/sda5&#160; &#160; 40G&#160; &#160;&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;ext4&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; /<br />/dev/sda6&#160; &#160; 80G&#160; &#160;&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;ext4&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; /home<br />/dev/sda7&#160; &#160; 8G&#160; &#160;&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;swap&#160; &#160; swap</p><p>After the installation<br />I installed the grub-package as instructed and tried to do the &quot;<em>sudo grub-install /dev/sda</em>&quot;.<br />This resulted in an error message the device /dev/sda not being available.</p><p>I then rebooted the system and found myself in Windows again.<br />So I rebooted from a standard Devuan3.0 Beowulf installer-iso to the <strong>maintenance mode</strong>.</p><p>From there I could perform the <br /><em>grub-install /dev/sda</em><br />and<br /><em>update-grub</em><br />and everything was fine.</p><p>Now, that the disk had a GRUB bootblock, I repeated the live-iso refracta installer again, including the <em>dpkg -i grub-pc...., grub-install and update-grub</em> and it was a success.<br />Unfortunately, the log of the first, failed attempt was lost due to the second installation.</p><p>I guess had I installed the first time on a wiped disk with no Windows using the live-iso I would have been successful right away.</p><p>I suggest not to invest a lot of time into that issue, since the true installer always works well and the installer on the live-isos were repeatedly slightly troublesome.</p><p>Hopefully that information is not too messy.... thank you for your thoughts. Andre</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Andre4freedom)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26258#p26258</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Testing for beowulf 3.1 point release]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26256#p26256</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Andre,</p><p>Thanks for testing and reporting. What trouble did you have with grub? I&#039;ve installed with and without a separate /boot partition. Other than installing the bootloader twice, it works correctly for me. Did you look at the error log? It should be in the user&#039;s home.</p><p>FYI: What we call &quot;installer isos&quot; refers to the isos with the debian(devuan)-installer. Not the live isos. Although either can be used to install devuan, as you know.</p><p>Bug#438 was fixed. You got the old lightdm because the fix is still in beowulf-proposed-updates, which is not in sources.list by default. We&#039;re working on another bug in lightdm, and it will get moved to the main beowulf repo when that one is fixed. Check this before you install the newer version:<br /><a href="https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=529" rel="nofollow">https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=529</a></p><p>I&#039;ve been using that newer version since the package was put in the repo, and I didn&#039;t notice any problem until I tried to connect with vnc.</p><p>fsmithred</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2020 17:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26256#p26256</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Testing for beowulf 3.1 point release]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26253#p26253</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello all, hello fsmithred,<br />late, but finally done, I tested the 2 procedures as you asked for in your original post.</p><p>1. - <strong>Updating</strong> a perfectly working Beowulf (Devian3) machine (EFI) worked very well. A few packages were updated, and I&#039;m glad to see that the Devuan bugreport&#160; #438 has been dealt with. Great. (The issue with the lightdm greeter&#039;s greyed activity menus)</p><p>2. - I have downloaded the <strong>installer iso</strong> and tested it on another machine: (refracta installer devuan_beowulf_3.1.0_2020-11-30_amd64_desktop-live.iso)<br />The iso and the installer worked, but: A: I had troubles getting the grub-install working. I have resolved it by doing it manually in a maintenance boot-session.<br />This was on a BIOS/MBR machine.<br />Then, when installing lightdm, the old bug #438 re-appeared. (I&#039;m quite confident the definitive installer isos -devuan 3.1- will have that fixed too.)</p><p>I hope this information to be useful. It comes from a user&#039;s perspective.<br />I&#039;m very happy to work with Devuan Linux.<br />Greetings, Andre4freedom</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Andre4freedom)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2020 12:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26253#p26253</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Testing for beowulf 3.1 point release]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26154#p26154</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Got it to work by applying the same changes gparted-live people did.</p><p>Patching the file</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>9990-misc-helpers.sh</code></pre></div><p>with the following patch </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>474a475,481
&gt;   if [ &quot;${fstype}&quot; = &quot;ntfs&quot; ]; then
&gt;       if type ntfs-3g &gt;/dev/null 2&gt;&amp;1; then
&gt;           return 0
&gt;       else
&gt;           return 1
&gt;       fi
&gt;   fi</code></pre></div><p>seems to be enough.</p><p><strong>Pro-tip:</strong> for a quick test you can avoid rebuilding the initrd by booting the iso with &quot;break=mount&quot; command line parameter, and applying the patch right in the shell.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (dev-1-dash-1)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 21:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26154#p26154</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Testing for beowulf 3.1 point release]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26143#p26143</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quick answer on compressing initrd. Look at extract_initrd() rebuild_initrd() starting at lines 316 and 385.<br /><a href="https://git.devuan.org/devuan/refractasnapshot-base/src/branch/master/refractasnapshot" rel="nofollow">https://git.devuan.org/devuan/refractas … tasnapshot</a><br />There&#039;s extra code if the cpu microcode is installed.</p><p>If you&#039;re doing this on a usb, you can mount the usb, copy the modified initrd to the /live folder and edit the boot menu. This won&#039;t work if you used dd to put the isohybrid image on the usb. It needs to be a real first partition.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26143#p26143</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Testing for beowulf 3.1 point release]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26141#p26141</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>fsmithred wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>If you try patching 9990-misc-helpers.sh please let me know how it goes. That file already gets patched for refracta2usb, and I could add the ntfs support next time I touch that package.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I&#039;ve tried patching it myself, but I am unable to boot with a modified initrd which I&#039;ve reconstructed by myself.</p><p>Maybe you can suggest something?</p><p>I unpack the beowulf-live initrd with </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>unmkinitramfs initrd.img /path/to/extracted/initrd-tree</code></pre></div><p>After I&#039;ve applied some changes, how do I compress it in exactly the same format?<br />I&#039;ve tried the following:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>find . | cpio -H newc -o &gt; ../initramfs.cpio
cat initramfs.cpio | gzip &gt; initramfs.igz</code></pre></div><p>But boot failed immediately and dropped me to the shell even though I&#039;ve only added some debug prints. </p><p>Do I have to insert the initrd into the iso image itself, or can I simply modify grub entry to load the custom initrd and it should work?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (dev-1-dash-1)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26141#p26141</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Testing for beowulf 3.1 point release]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26140#p26140</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve tested the gparted-live-1.0.0-3 live image, which is being discussed in the forum post I&#039;ve linked at message #8 in this thread.<br />The url for the actual live image is:<br /><a href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/gparted/files/gparted-live-stable/1.0.0-3/gparted-live-1.0.0-3-amd64.iso/download" rel="nofollow">https://sourceforge.net/projects/gparte … o/download</a></p><p>I was able to boot it to desktop from an ntfs partition.</p><p>I looked into the initrd, /lib/live/boot directory and ran a diff command between beowulf&#039;s files at the same location in the initrd.<br />There are a number of differences, I&#039;m not posting full diff because most of them don&#039;t seem related to ntfs.<br />However, here&#039;s the diff between the 9990-misc-helpers.sh file:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>82c82
&lt;   elif echo &quot;${sysfs_path}&quot; | grep -q &#039;^/block/vd[a-z]$&#039;
---
&gt;   elif echo &quot;${sysfs_path}&quot; | grep -q &#039;^/block/[hsv]d[a-z]$&#039;
474a475,482 
&gt;   # For ntfs, since user space program ntfs-3g will be used. Check ntfs-3g instead of kernel module.
&gt;   if [ &quot;${fstype}&quot; = &quot;ntfs&quot; ]; then
&gt;       if type ntfs-3g &gt;/dev/null 2&gt;&amp;1; then
&gt;           return 0
&gt;       else
&gt;           return 1
&gt;       fi
&gt;   fi
1222c1230
&lt;       if [ &quot;$(cat ${sysblock}/removable)&quot; = &quot;1&quot; ]
---
&gt;       if [ &quot;$(cat ${sysblock}/removable 2&gt;/dev/null)&quot; = &quot;1&quot; ]
1270c1278
&lt;       if [ &quot;$(cat ${sysblock}/removable)&quot; = &quot;0&quot; ]
---
&gt;       if [ &quot;$(cat ${sysblock}/removable 2&gt;/dev/null)&quot; = &quot;0&quot; ]</code></pre></div><p>The second difference looks almost exactly like the post you linked to in message #9 of this thread.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (dev-1-dash-1)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26140#p26140</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Testing for beowulf 3.1 point release]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26139#p26139</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If you try patching 9990-misc-helpers.sh please let me know how it goes. That file already gets patched for refracta2usb, and I could add the ntfs support next time I touch that package.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26139#p26139</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Testing for beowulf 3.1 point release]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26138#p26138</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>fsmithred wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>I think this post has the magic sauce: <a href="https://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2020/08/msg00038.html" rel="nofollow">https://lists.debian.org/debian-live/20 … 00038.html</a><br />That function, is_supported_fs is in /lib/live/boot/9990-misc-helpers.sh</p></div></blockquote></div><p>That seems close to the target.<br />If I have some time and energy in the next few days, maybe I&#039;ll try looking into it more. It might be just a few lines of code needed to fix it.</p><p>For the moment, we can conclude that it&#039;s another feature that has been working for decades but has been cancelled by Debian.<br />Thus it doesn&#039;t block release of beowulf 3.1.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (dev-1-dash-1)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26138#p26138</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Testing for beowulf 3.1 point release]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26133#p26133</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think this post has the magic sauce: <a href="https://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2020/08/msg00038.html" rel="nofollow">https://lists.debian.org/debian-live/20 … 00038.html</a></p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>live-boot&#039;s function &#039;is_supported_fs&#039; should add one statement,&#039;if test &quot;$fstype&quot; = &quot;ntfs&quot; -a -e /sbin/mount.ntfs -a -e /bin/ntfs-3g;then return 0;fi &#039;.</p><p>ntfs-3g&#039;s command is /bin/ntfs-3g,and /sbin/mount.ntfs (also /sbin/mount.ntfs-3g) is a soft link to /bin/ntfs-3g.when user installed ntfs-3g,it&#039;s /var/lib/dpkg/ntfs-3g.postinst will auto remake initrd.img (call update-initramfs),include live-boot&#039;script in new initrd.img,but,when live-boot not change it&#039;s code of function &#039;is_supported_fs&#039;,new initrd.img will boot failed on ntfs.All live-boot need to do is add one statement to it.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>That function, is_supported_fs is in /lib/live/boot/9990-misc-helpers.sh<br />But I&#039;m not sure where that test goes. Maybe early in the function to avoid some of the other tests.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2020 19:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26133#p26133</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Testing for beowulf 3.1 point release]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26131#p26131</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>fsmithred wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Where the hell did ntfs.ko go? On my installed beowulf system, it&#039;s missing. Same ntfs packages are installed as in my ascii, which does have ntfs.ko.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Thanks for paying attention and replying, fsmithred. That&#039;s why I (and I&#039;m sure many others) use devuan - because of the sensible attitude towards resolving actual issues.</p><p>However, in this case:<br /><strong>FALSE ALARM!</strong><br />I&#039;ve just tested the debian-live-10.7.0-mate-amd64.iso directrly from debian.</p><p>It behaves <strong>exactly</strong> the same. No ntfs.ko in initramfs. &quot;Warning: unable to mount /dev/sda3&quot; when trying to access iso on ntfs partition.</p><p>Therefore: it&#039;s a Debian change, and Devuan simply mirrored it, and there&#039;s no direct obligation for Devuan team to do anything about it since it isn&#039;t connected to *ystemd.</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>In ascii, apt-file shows that it comes with the kernel. In beowulf, apt-file doesn&#039;t find ntfs.ko.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I can see the same results for ascii. I don&#039;t have a beowulf system right now near me.</p><p>If we were to try:<br />The simplest way to include ntfs.ko into the initramfs would probably be modifying &quot;/etc/initramfs-tools/modules&quot;, but first making sure that the modules themselves are installed on the base system of course. I don&#039;t know why they aren&#039;t there on beowulf.</p><p>Can you tell me how big a partition I would need to install a minimal beowulf 3.1 system from the live image? If I have a partition big enough I can maybe try and find an easy solution.</p><p>In the meantime - this isn&#039;t a Devuan problem, so it&#039;s a non-blocking issue if you are planning to release 3.1.<br />As I described, the beowulf 3.0 problems with eudev are not present in 3.1, so progress has already been made.</p><p><strong>Update:</strong><br />Debian has dropped the support of ntfs.ko: (see: 29 June 2019: GParted Live 1.0.0-3 Stable Release)<br /><a href="https://gparted.org/news.php?item=224Release" rel="nofollow">https://gparted.org/news.php?item=224Release</a></p><p>And here people seem to be solving the same problem:<br /><a href="http://gparted-forum.surf4.info/viewtopic.php?pid=35358" rel="nofollow">http://gparted-forum.surf4.info/viewtopic.php?pid=35358</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (dev-1-dash-1)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2020 18:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26131#p26131</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Testing for beowulf 3.1 point release]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26129#p26129</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I can confirm that the ntfs kernel modules are not in the beowulf iso&#039;s initramfs, and that they are in the ascii iso&#039;s initramfs.</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>3.1
# lsinitramfs mnt/live/initrd.img |grep ntfs
scripts/local-bottom/ntfs_3g
scripts/local-premount/ntfs_3g
usr/bin/ntfs-3g
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libntfs-3g.so.883
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libntfs-3g.so.883.0.0
usr/sbin/mount.ntfs
usr/sbin/mount.ntfs-3g

2.1
# lsinitramfs mnt/live/initrd.img |grep ntfs
bin/ntfs-3g
sbin/mount.ntfs-3g
sbin/mount.ntfs
scripts/local-premount/ntfs_3g
scripts/local-bottom/ntfs_3g
lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libntfs-3g.so.871
lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libntfs-3g.so.871.0.0
lib/modules/4.9.0-11-amd64/kernel/fs/ntfs
lib/modules/4.9.0-11-amd64/kernel/fs/ntfs/ntfs.ko</code></pre></div><p>Where the hell did ntfs.ko go? On my installed beowulf system, it&#039;s missing. Same ntfs packages are installed as in my ascii, which does have ntfs.ko. In ascii, apt-file shows that it comes with the kernel. In beowulf, apt-file doesn&#039;t find ntfs.ko.</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>dpkg -l |grep ntfs
ii  libntfs-3g883                           1:2017.3.23AR.3-3                   amd64        read/write NTFS driver for FUSE (runtime library)
ii  ntfs-3g                                 1:2017.3.23AR.3-3                   amd64        read/write NTFS driver for FUSE

# find /lib/modules/4.19.0-13-amd64/ -name &quot;*ntfs*&quot;
#

# locate ntfs.ko
#</code></pre></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2020 18:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26129#p26129</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Testing for beowulf 3.1 point release]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26125#p26125</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>fsmithred wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>I don&#039;t know what decisions went into using start-stop-daemon. There were a few iterations of the patch, and they all seemed to work.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>As it stands now, udev seems to work correctly, so it&#039;s not a big deal. <br />The only &quot;problem&quot; here may be a few microseconds and a few kb of ram temporarily used when starting the &quot;start-stop-daemon&quot; binary itself. I was only pointing this out because I believe any unneccessary &quot;extra layer&quot;, even one as simple as start-stop-daemon, should be justified, and, as you know it had already caused some problems in the past.</p><p>Again, right now everything seems to work correctly wrt udev, so no problems here.</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>NTFS: If something is missing, I have no idea what it is. I did not remove any packages and ntfs-3g is installed in the live system. Do you maybe need to load a grub module before loading the kernel?</p></div></blockquote></div><p>This is not a grub problem - grub loads the kernel and the initrd into memory from &quot;within&quot; the iso when the iso itself is on an ntfs partition.<br />The problem appears later, I think, when initrd is parsing the &quot;fromiso=/dev/sda3:/path/to.iso&quot; kernel command line parameter. It tries to mount the iso but fails, because it can not mount ntfs filesystem.<br /><strong>Edit:</strong>The full grub entry looks like this (has been working since forever with debian,devuan, ubuntu with some changes):</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>menuentry &#039;Devuan Ascii 2.1 Live cd&#039; {
        set root=&quot;hd0,3&quot;
        set isofile=&quot;/devuan_ascii_2.1_amd64_desktop-live.iso&quot;
        set gfxpayload=keep
        loopback loop ($root)$isofile
        linux   (loop)/live/vmlinuz boot=live username=devuan fromiso=/dev/sda3$isofile
        initrd  (loop)/live/initrd.img
    }</code></pre></div><p>This seems to be an initrd problem, it might be necessary to regenerate it and include the ntfs modules. Here&#039;s why I think so:<br />1) Open/unpack the &quot;devuan_beowulf_3.1.0_2020-11-30_amd64_desktop-live.iso&quot; file.<br />2) Within it: go to &quot;/live&quot; directory.<br />3) There is a file &quot;initrd.img&quot;<br />4) Open/unpack this file (on ascii, use &quot;unmkinitramfs&quot; command)<br />5) Go to &quot;/lib/modules/4.19.0-13-amd64/kernel/fs&quot; within it.<br />6) Note there are directories like btrfs, ext4, fat, xfs, but <strong>there is no &quot;ntfs&quot; directory</strong><br />7) Now, inspect the &quot;devuan_ascii_2.1_amd64_desktop-live.iso&quot;, for example, and see that &quot;ntfs&quot; directory is there. (obviously the path is a bit different due to different kernel version, &quot;/lib/modules/4.9.0-11-amd64/kernel/fs&quot;. That one loads the iso from ntfs partition just fine.</p><p>Also, when unpacking the initrd from ascii 2.1 live iso when using &quot;unmkinitramfs&quot;, we get two directories - &quot;early&quot; and &quot;main&quot;, &quot;early&quot; contains processor microcode, &quot;main&quot; contains the initrd tree itself. That means there are basically two (2) archives in the initrd itself. </p><p>Shouldn&#039;t the &quot;beowulf-3.1&quot; initrd also include processor microcode?<br />Note: I am using the ascii &quot;unmkinitramfs&quot; script to unpack a &quot;beowulf&quot; initrd, that may be a source of the problem.</p><p>Please doublecheck.</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>acpi-fakekey is still there because I didn&#039;t think to remove it. I will do so in the rebuild.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Again, it doesn&#039;t cause problems, it&#039;s simply not needed if udev has done all the work wrt detecting mouse/kbd/sound etc. As I&#039;ve said, udev seems to be working correctly.<br />However acpi-fakekey may be needed on the live image itself, if perhaps, something fails on an unusual configuration. Having an extra layer of reliability is not a bad idea for livecd.<br />But perhaps you can exclude it from the system which will be installed to hdd itself.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (dev-1-dash-1)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2020 15:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26125#p26125</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Testing for beowulf 3.1 point release]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26124#p26124</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the detailed report. I don&#039;t know what decisions went into using start-stop-daemon. There were a few iterations of the patch, and they all seemed to work.</p><p>NTFS: If something is missing, I have no idea what it is. I did not remove any packages and ntfs-3g is installed in the live system. Do you maybe need to load a grub module before loading the kernel?</p><p>acpi-fakekey is still there because I didn&#039;t think to remove it. I will do so in the rebuild.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2020 15:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26124#p26124</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Testing for beowulf 3.1 point release]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26112#p26112</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Testing the amd64 live-iso.</p><p>Burned to physical dvd. </p><p>Udev seems fine, all modules loaded on first try (with or without &quot;toram&quot;).<br />Network cards and sound working -&#160; the system even detected which output I had plugged and set default output accordingly. This is even more than I expected - usually some tweaking is needed on my setup to select the correct output. Very good.<br />Switching betweet manual/dhcp, as well as lan/wi-fi using wicd - all ok.<br />Cryptsetup, lvm work ok.<br />Added backports (with contrib and non-free sections), built zfs-dkms modules, imported the pools - all ok.<br />Used &quot;dkms mkbmdeb&quot; to pack the zfs modules into a deb, rebooted and installed the deb to avoid recompile of zfs modules - all ok.</p><p>Module count, as indicated by &quot;lsmod | wc -l&quot; is the same w/ or wo/ &quot;toram&quot; parameter.</p><p><strong>Problem:</strong><br />Trying to load the iso from hd through grub entry failed:<br />&quot;Warning: can not mount /dev/sda3&quot;.<br />That&#039;s an ntfs partition where I&#039;ve placed the iso, and, as I suspected, the <strong>ntfs modules are missing from /live/boot.img.</strong><br />Deliberate policy or accidental omission? I hope the latter.<br />I used to be able to boot debian/devuan/ubuntu and many others from ntfs partitions like this.<br />When placing the iso to an ext4 partition, the boot proceeds normally.</p><p><strong>Minor issues:</strong><br />1)Incosistent formatting wrt tabs/spaces in &quot;/etc/init.d/eudev&quot; between start) and other) sections. Has no run-time effect.<br />2)Usage of &quot;start-stop-daemon&quot; to start eudev is not neccessary. It doesn&#039;t do any damage in this configuration, but it&#039;s still not needed. Udev will be perfectly fine when started as &quot;udevd --daemon&quot; - the way it was in jessie/ascii, unless I am mistaken.<br />3)acpi-fakekeyd: not neccessary anymore since eudev startup seems to be in order. May be used as a fail-safe for live-cd, but maybe consider adding it to exclude list, if possible, for the actual refracta-install process. Some people have complained that system installed from live-image uses a bit more resources - it&#039;s not much, and does no harm, but acpi-fakekey may be one of the reasons.</p><p>Other than that, live-image seems very good.</p><p>Keep Devuan rock-solid.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (dev-1-dash-1)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 18:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26112#p26112</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
