<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=3976&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / fstab, UUID and SD Card drive letter assignments]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=3976</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in fstab, UUID and SD Card drive letter assignments.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 18:31:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: fstab, UUID and SD Card drive letter assignments]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26068#p26068</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Altoid wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>1st. question</p></div></blockquote></div><p>As dice says: don&#039;t use the block devices as <em>fs_spec</em> identifiers in <span class="bbc">/etc/fstab</span>, they can change from one boot to the next. You could also use a partition LABEL as an alternative to the UUID, or the PARTUUID or PARTLABEL (for GUID partition tables only).</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>Altoid wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>2nd. question</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I use a simple (Korn Shell) script to backup my Debian system to the spare drive in my laptop: <a href="https://gist.githubusercontent.com/Head-on-a-Stick/371603b5dda7f04f4901743939af35bd/raw/a52b79b1f8e6a59105d10f2773fefcc5895e22dd/backup" rel="nofollow">https://gist.githubusercontent.com/Head … 2dd/backup</a></p><p>That script hardcodes <span class="bbc">/dev/sda1</span> as the backup drive because it&#039;s the only SATA device and so never changes, you should probably use the <span class="bbc">/dev/disk/by-uuid/</span> identifiers instead.</p><p>See also <a href="https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Rsync#Full_system_backup" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Rs … tem_backup</a></p><p>In my case the script is called by a systemd .service (hence all of the <span class="bbc">print</span> statements, which are recorded in the journal), run once a week by a systemd .timer; for Devuan you could use a(n) (ana)cron job instead.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Head_on_a_Stick)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 18:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26068#p26068</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: fstab, UUID and SD Card drive letter assignments]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26058#p26058</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>1st question, i think answer would be to only use uuid&#039;s in the /etc/fstab </p><p>2nd question, answer would maybe be to use those two extra drives for backups using clonezilla.</p><p><a href="https://clonezilla.org/" rel="nofollow">https://clonezilla.org/</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (dice)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 12:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26058#p26058</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[fstab, UUID and SD Card drive letter assignments]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26057#p26057</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><p>I&#039;ve been writing/re-writing a few *.iso files to SD Cards for working on my Beowulf+1000HE test installation and using my main box to do so.</p><p>My <span class="bbc">/etc/fstab</span> was <em>supposed</em> to have all drives with their corresponding file system+UUID pairing.</p><p>But it turns out that I had forgotten to do add a UUID to a SAS HDD that I later stated using to keep stuff in.<br />And (as was bound to happen) screwed it up.</p><p>Fortunately <span class="bbc">testdisk</span> and <span class="bbc">gparted</span> did their job and after a couple of hours things were back to normal.&#160; 8^7</p><p>1st. question:<br />If every drive is assigned a file system ie: /dev/sdX and linked to a UUID, am I safe from this happening again?<br />ie: will file system labels remain unmovable and anything plugged in will use other ie: unused file system labels?</p><p>2nd. question:<br />I have a couple of 500Gb 2.5&quot; SATA drives that get very little or no use these days.<br />I could mount them inside my box and use them to back up the contents of the different drives I keep stuff in just to be safe, not for fast access.</p><p>What method would you suggest to get that done?</p><p>Thanks in advance.</p><p>Cheers,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 11:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26057#p26057</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
