Dev1 Galaxy Forum / Thanks Devuan Developers

Re: Thanks Devuan Developers

dummy@example.com (brocashelm) — Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:56:31 +0000

I'm using Runit on all my systems. It just works.

Re: Thanks Devuan Developers

dummy@example.com (HevyDevy) — Thu, 23 Jul 2020 14:15:10 +0000

larsH wrote:

Hi
To me it was no joke but true. Sysvinit is slower at boot than systemd. But it is smarter and simpler and more reliable in so many other ways ;-))
Have a nice day
Lars H

Im running ceres on an encrypted 256G ssd partition and the boot time last i check was around 5 seconds. Not sure what upstream are doing but its quick in regards to sysv. Little bit slower on stable but not that bad imo.

Re: Thanks Devuan Developers

dummy@example.com (larsH) — Wed, 22 Jul 2020 21:52:35 +0000

To me it was no joke but true. Sysvinit is slower at boot than systemd. But it is smarter and simpler and more reliable in so many other ways ;-))

Have a nice day
Lars H

Re: Thanks Devuan Developers

dummy@example.com (Head_on_a_Stick) — Wed, 22 Jul 2020 20:16:02 +0000

fsmithred wrote:

Sarcastic joke removed

I liked that joke, it was funny

Vernon wrote:

Thanks very much Devuan developers!

Re: Thanks Devuan Developers

dummy@example.com (fsmithred) — Tue, 21 Jul 2020 21:36:11 +0000

Thanks. Welcome to Devuan.

Edit: (Sarcastic joke removed)

Thanks Devuan Developers

dummy@example.com (Vernon) — Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:19:21 +0000

I installed Devuan with LXQt after Fedora dropped i386 support. I opted for Fedora since it had the latest kernel with a bluetooth driver for my netbook. However, I found out to my dismay that my netbook Bluetooth doesn't support Low Energy which means I couldn't connect to my mouse which required it. I have now installed Devuan and am overjoyed with the over 2 times reduction in boot up time and snappier performance versus bloated Fedora, Thanks very much Devuan developers!