<![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / amarok 2.9 is not in buster, will it be in beowulf?]]> https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=3104 Sat, 12 Oct 2019 18:44:13 +0000 FluxBB <![CDATA[Re: amarok 2.9 is not in buster, will it be in beowulf?]]> https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=18220#p18220 basati wrote:

Forgive me for being such a jerk.

You are not smile
It just happens that you like Amarok. Like a lot of people. This is about free software.

]]> Sat, 12 Oct 2019 18:44:13 +0000 https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=18220#p18220 <![CDATA[Re: amarok 2.9 is not in buster, will it be in beowulf?]]> https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=18219#p18219 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo … bug=874811 & https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo … g=935022#5

and yes, when amarok qt5 port re-appears in buster-backports it will appear in beowulf-backports as well.

]]> Sat, 12 Oct 2019 18:38:51 +0000 https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=18219#p18219 <![CDATA[amarok 2.9 is not in buster, will it be in beowulf?]]> https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=18214#p18214 In the case of amarok we depend on debian kde team?

this in sid for powerpcspe architecture, not even for amd64

If they put him in the buster backport, do we too?

Amarok is the program I use, it is very good. And I'm burned

Forgive me for being such a jerk.

a greeting

]]> Sat, 12 Oct 2019 09:34:54 +0000 https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=18214#p18214