<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=3073&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / /etc/os-release error]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=3073</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in /etc/os-release error.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 10:56:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: /etc/os-release error]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=18010#p18010</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think Debian itself is stopping its effort to chase LSB full compliance: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_Standard_Base#Limitations_on_Debian" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_Sta … _on_Debian</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (bgstack15)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 10:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=18010#p18010</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: /etc/os-release error]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=18002#p18002</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>fsmithred wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Um, we did that. It&#039;s in /etc/os-release.&#160; <span class="bbc">ID=debian</span> magically makes third-party software work with devuan. I think there&#039;s another reason for it, but I don&#039;t remember what it is. What I don&#039;t get is why /etc/lsb-release doesn&#039;t override it like it used to.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>In my poking around re: this issue, I got the impression that lsb_release has change a bit over the last few interations. Seems to be somewhat of a moving target. </p><p>I changed it to Devuan in my system, and haven&#039;t noticed any ill effects, but is something suddenly stops working, I&#039;ll know where to look. I really don&#039;t care what lsb_release reports :-)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sgage)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2019 23:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=18002#p18002</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: /etc/os-release error]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=18001#p18001</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Um, we did that. It&#039;s in /etc/os-release.&#160; <span class="bbc">ID=debian</span> magically makes third-party software work with devuan. I think there&#039;s another reason for it, but I don&#039;t remember what it is. What I don&#039;t get is why /etc/lsb-release doesn&#039;t override it like it used to.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2019 23:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=18001#p18001</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[/etc/os-release error]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=17997#p17997</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have been running a beowulf installation for some time, and I only just noticed that lsb_release -a reported &#039;Debian&#039; as the &#039;Distributor ID&#039;. The os-release file has Debian instead of Devuan as the ID, and that&#039;s what gets reported.</p><p>This is a very serious, show-stopper bug, and I trust that the entire Devuan Project will drop what they&#039;re doing and turn their attention 100% to this issue until it is fixed.&#160; ;-)&#160; ;-)&#160; ;-)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sgage)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2019 20:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=17997#p17997</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
