<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2738&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / Avidemux and h264enc]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=2738</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Avidemux and h264enc.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:15:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Avidemux and h264enc]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=14969#p14969</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I also like h264enc.&#160; Actually I like h264enc better at least for my personal usage.&#160; Yes, avidemux is one resources eating software.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Job)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=14969#p14969</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Avidemux and h264enc]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=14963#p14963</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>This is also off topic . . .</p><p>When I tried avidemux (it may have been twice, my memory isn&#039;t as good anymore) it was so buggy I got rid of it.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Ron)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 01:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=14963#p14963</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Avidemux and h264enc]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=14961#p14961</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Off topic . . . personal rant.</p><p>I have used avidemux for over a decade to edit video with great success,&#160; Then they went to qt then they dropped the fade filter then went to using time instead of frames so all that frame-based work is no longer compatible with their latest and greatest.&#160; I was not happy about that.&#160; They used to have a flatpak which was the first I&#039;d heard of it.&#160; Read what a flatpak was, said no thank you and decided to stick with an older version from Wheezy on jessie until it refuses to work anymore.</p><p>/end rant</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (golinux)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 21:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=14961#p14961</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Avidemux and h264enc]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=14960#p14960</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes it&#039;s good to be weary about that. Important, really. Especially if you&#039;re unsure about how to recover if things break.</p><p>At the same time, <span class="bbc">avidemux</span> is imo the very best tool for e.g., easily and quickly cutting out the ads in a tv streamed Barbie movie you have captured for your granddaughter. Since I have it installed and verified myself, I decided that the benefit of suggesting this action outweighed the general &quot;badness&quot; of proposing this repo mixing.</p><p>But you are right, the rule of thumb is still: &quot;don&#039;t mix repos&quot; .</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (ralph.ronnquist)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 21:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=14960#p14960</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Avidemux and h264enc]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=14950#p14950</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ralph, coming from Debian I was a little unsure about mixing repos.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Job)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=14950#p14950</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Avidemux and h264enc]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=14949#p14949</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I did this by using <span class="bbc"><a href="http://www.deb-multimedia.org" rel="nofollow">www.deb-multimedia.org</a></span>, where their <span class="bbc">stretch</span> distribution is compatible with <span class="bbc">ascii</span>. It&#039;s the usual process of adding the source, update, install their keyring, and then install the packages.</p><p>Thus, add to your sources</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>deb http://www.deb-multimedia.org stretch main</code></pre></div><p>then </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>apt-get update</code></pre></div><p> then </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>install deb-multimedia-keyring</code></pre></div><p> then another </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>apt-get update</code></pre></div><p> then </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>apt-get install --no-install-recommends avidemux h264enc</code></pre></div><p> and then <strong>comment out the source line</strong> and update yet again.</p><p>That last step is a precaution, to avoid any &quot;accidental&quot; other installations from that repository.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (ralph.ronnquist)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 12:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=14949#p14949</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Avidemux and h264enc]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=14948#p14948</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>How do you install avidemux?&#160; well besides the confusing way at avidemux.org.&#160; Same with h264enc.&#160; I already have non-free and contrib in sources.list. </p><p>Thank you,</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Job)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 11:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=14948#p14948</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
