<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2454&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / Epiphany - adblocker's efficiency?]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=2454</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Epiphany - adblocker's efficiency?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 20:45:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Epiphany - adblocker's efficiency?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=12669#p12669</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>As an old friend used to say, &quot;nothing beats your own research.&quot;</p><p>&gt;visit many websites and compare with firefox/ubo<br />&gt;run tcptrack or wireshark/tshark in the background<br />&gt;remember that javascript should always be used with extreme caution (or not at all).</p><p>crunkbong was actually designed to play around with questions like those in a contained environment.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (siva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 20:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=12669#p12669</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Epiphany - adblocker's efficiency?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=12540#p12540</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello </p><p>Do you think Epiphany&#039;s built-in adblocker makes this web browser secure? It is probably not as good as ublock origin but I don&#039;t know anything about it. Do you have any information or feedbacks?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (HextorBRX)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2018 12:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=12540#p12540</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
