<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2366&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / Firefox 60.2.0esr - Rollback]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=2366</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Firefox 60.2.0esr - Rollback.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 21:17:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Firefox 60.2.0esr - Rollback]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11868#p11868</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The tail of this thread was split off into another thread. For the current discussion, go here -<br /><a href="https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=2373" rel="nofollow">https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=2373</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 21:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11868#p11868</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Firefox 60.2.0esr - Rollback]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11799#p11799</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>That makes sense.&#160; I use it on my work PC and haven&#039;t noticed that behavior, but I also only navigate to bookmarks through the nav bar &quot;suggestions.&quot; (It&#039;s the only one I enable.)&#160; I use Waterfox on Linux as a compromise between stability and using the new (quantum) add-on api.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>Altoid wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>How long did it take the Mozilla crew to realise that those damn &#039;rounded borders&#039; were crap?</p></div></blockquote></div><p>+1</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (siva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2018 01:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11799#p11799</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Firefox 60.2.0esr - Rollback]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11797#p11797</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>siva wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... humor me for a minute, what about Quantum did you dislike?</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Sure ...&#160; =-)</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>siva wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Was it only the UI?</p></div></blockquote></div><p>[humour mode]<br />More than anything, the UI.</p><p>The new <span class="bbu">absolutely unneeded</span> dancing dots and progress line that show as a page is loading.<br />I mean, WTF?</p><p>And then there&#039;s this new way the drop-down folders in the menu bar open to the right and <span class="bbu">only</span> to the right.<br />There have been many complaints about this last one on the web and the proposed solution actually was to <em>edit all your bookmarks</em> so they will be shorter and thus not go off the screen (on to the next one in my case).<br />Really?</p><p>I tell you, whoever is in charge of the Firefox UI design does not seem to be the brightest lightbulb in the room.</p><p>Then there&#039;s the addons I lost, so I&#039;ll wait to see what happens and eventually (if things don&#039;t get straightened out) see about using <span class="bbu">another</span> browser.</p><p>I have not lost hope but I won&#039;t be holding my breath.<br />How long did it take the Mozilla crew to realise that those damn &#039;rounded borders&#039; were crap?<br />[/humour mode]</p><p>Cheers,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 22:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11797#p11797</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Firefox 60.2.0esr - Rollback]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11794#p11794</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>KatolaZ wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p> ... instead of using third-party stuff, why don&#039;t you just get the packages from the Debian repo?</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Well ...</p><p>1.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>OP wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... run them to see which version was the last before these guys screwed up ...</p></div></blockquote></div><p>2.<br />Once I found out that the one I wanted was <span class="bbc">Firefox-55.0.glibc2.3.4-x86_64</span>, I went looking for it but the repo jumps from 52.9 to 60.4.</p><p>That&#039;s about it.</p><p>Cheers,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 22:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11794#p11794</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Firefox 60.2.0esr - Rollback]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11790#p11790</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@Altoid: if you might humor me for a minute, what about Quantum did you dislike?&#160; Was it only the UI?&#160; I&#039;m just curious.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (siva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 18:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11790#p11790</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Firefox 60.2.0esr - Rollback]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11788#p11788</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@Altoid: instead of using third-party stuff, why don&#039;t you just get the packages from the Debian repo? </p><p>&#160; <a href="http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/f/firefox-esr/" rel="nofollow">http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/ma … refox-esr/</a></p><p>My2Cents</p><p>KatolaZ</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (KatolaZ)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 15:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11788#p11788</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Firefox 60.2.0esr - Rollback]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11787#p11787</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><p>Thanks for the fast reply.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>fsmithred wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... just download the package and install it.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>OK.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>fsmithred wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... a copy of the package in /var/cache/apt/archives/.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>No, it&#039;s not one of the packages there.<br />Must have cleaned up recently. </p><p>I&#039;ve downloaded a few of the available AppImage files from <a href="https://bintray.com/probono/AppImages/Firefox#files" rel="nofollow">bintray.com</a> and run them to see which version was the last before these guys screwed up the interface (more than they already had).</p><p>You just download it to a suitable place in you /home folder, make it executable and start it.<br />It picks up all your settings.</p><p>Running one of these <span class="bbc">*.AppImage</span> files may be even better than installing the application., I have to check how that can be done.</p><p>In case anyone else is interested, the version without the <em>improvements</em> to the interface is <span class="bbc">Firefox-55.0.glibc2.3.4-x86_64.AppImage</span>.<br />From then on ...&#160; &#160;: ^/ </p><p>Thanks for your input.</p><p>Cheers,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 10:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11787#p11787</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Firefox 60.2.0esr - Rollback]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11784#p11784</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you can just download the package and install it. You might already have a copy of the package in /var/cache/apt/archives/.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 03:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11784#p11784</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Firefox 60.2.0esr - Rollback]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11781#p11781</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><p>On Fri Sep&#160; 7 22:18:12 2018 I upgraded firefox-esr (52.9.0esr-1~deb9u1) to 60.2.0esr-1~deb9u2, <span class="bbu">something I deeply regret</span>.</p><p>I&#039;d like to rollback to the previous version firefox-esr (52.9.0esr-1~deb9u1) or maybe something in-between and pin it.<br />60.2 is a POS interface wise.</p><p>Just what are these guys at Mozilla thinking?</p><p>How can I do this without screwing up my installation?<br />Is it OK to just fetch the package from the Debian repos and install it?</p><p>Thanks in advance,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 22:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11781#p11781</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
