<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1817&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / Installing Musescore 2.1 AppImage on Miyo i3 Jessie 64bit.]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=1817</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Installing Musescore 2.1 AppImage on Miyo i3 Jessie 64bit..]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:35:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Installing Musescore 2.1 AppImage on Miyo i3 Jessie 64bit.]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=7096#p7096</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>golinux wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>A two minute search found this:</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>Is Flatpak tied to systemd?<br />No. Versions of flatpak before 0.6.10 relied on systemd for cgroups setup, but this is no longer required.]</p></div></blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div><p>This I knew. While Flatpak isn&#039;t tied to systemd, that doesn&#039;t mean that it in principle couldn&#039;t be pulled in as a depend for the individual flatpak. I am unsure as how deep the depends for the individual flatpak are pulled in, when one can assume that many programs are coded to &quot;take advantage of&quot; systemd. Or am I misunderstanding something?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (devuan_dk_fan)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=7096#p7096</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Installing Musescore 2.1 AppImage on Miyo i3 Jessie 64bit.]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=7095#p7095</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>devuan_dk_fan wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>This brings up the issue of Flatpaks as an alternative to AppImages. Is it possible to use Flatpaks and ensure that systemd stays off my system?</p></div></blockquote></div><p>A two minute search found this:</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>Is Flatpak tied to systemd?<br />No. Versions of flatpak before 0.6.10 relied on systemd for cgroups setup, but this is no longer required.]</p></div></blockquote></div><p>However, this is not so encouraging - guilty by association:</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>Its lead developer is Alex Larsson, Principal Engineer at Red Hat.</p></div></blockquote></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (golinux)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=7095#p7095</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Installing Musescore 2.1 AppImage on Miyo i3 Jessie 64bit.]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=7093#p7093</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>This brings up the issue of Flatpaks as an alternative to AppImages. Is it possible to use Flatpaks and ensure that systemd stays off my system?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (devuan_dk_fan)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 08:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=7093#p7093</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Installing Musescore 2.1 AppImage on Miyo i3 Jessie 64bit.]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=7091#p7091</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><span class="bbc">$ ./MuseScore-2.1-x86_64.AppImage <br />/tmp/.mount_lNQqEe/bin/mscore-portable: error while loading shared libraries: libvorbisfile.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory.</span><br />OK, so the reason is that it is lacking a bunch of dependencies like vorbis-tools, libsound files, pulse audio, etc. It looks like it probably best if I choose a less minimalist Devuan derivative. Anyway, thanks for your time.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (devuan_dk_fan)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 23:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=7091#p7091</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Installing Musescore 2.1 AppImage on Miyo i3 Jessie 64bit.]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=7090#p7090</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>OK, I tried Subsurface and it runs in place, but refuses to install to all users <span class="bbc">sudo ./Musescore 2.1 AppImage install</span>. This seems to suggest that there is something with Musescore that refuses to work. I know that it has QT dependencies when it is installed as a .deb file. I will try to find an answer on their forum and post the reply here.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (devuan_dk_fan)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 22:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=7090#p7090</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Installing Musescore 2.1 AppImage on Miyo i3 Jessie 64bit.]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=7088#p7088</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I just tried Subsurface, and it works in Refracta jessie (Devuan) and also works when I boot miyolinux-64bit-20161217.iso in virtualbox. I did not run any commands except chmod to make it executable, and then ./Subsurface-&lt;version&gt;.Appimage. A couple of popup windows asked me some questions. I declined to install it, and then the app opened. </p><p>So I guess the answer is yes, appimages can work on devuan. I don&#039;t know if that means they&#039;ll all work. What did you try?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 20:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=7088#p7088</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Installing Musescore 2.1 AppImage on Miyo i3 Jessie 64bit.]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=7085#p7085</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Devuan is fantastic. kudos to the team behind it!</p><p>Normally, running <span class="bbc">sudo ./Musescore 2.1 AppImage install</span> (or whatever the file is called) will install a working version of the program on my system. I tried this with a Miyo i3 Jessie 64bit (Devuan based) system and while everything appears to have gone to the correct place, the program doesn&#039;t seem to work, no matter how I try to run it (menu, comman, clicking on the executable image (yes, I ran chmod +x on it). Don&#039;t AppImages work on Devuan or is there something with the way this program has been packaged that makes it incompatible with Devuan based systems (systemd dependence)?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (devuan_dk_fan)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 19:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=7085#p7085</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
