<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1600&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / SOLVED Brother Scanner not detected by Sane]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=1600</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in SOLVED Brother Scanner not detected by Sane.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:36:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: SOLVED Brother Scanner not detected by Sane]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=5096#p5096</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Greenbeans solved it by suggesting to use the printer installer package instead installing the drivers themselves.</p><p>Thank you so much everyone !!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (rodancap)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=5096#p5096</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: SOLVED Brother Scanner not detected by Sane]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=5095#p5095</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>To be sure, each rule is on a single line. Refer to </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>man udev</code></pre></div><p>for details.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (ralph.ronnquist)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 23:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=5095#p5095</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: SOLVED Brother Scanner not detected by Sane]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=5094#p5094</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>All in one, so it&#039;s a printer too correct?</p><p>The other config tool that always works for me is the system-config-printer package, been many many years since I had to work hard to set up a printer, I install that package and printer-drivers-all and it has worked on all debian or Devuan systems.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (greenjeans)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 23:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=5094#p5094</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: SOLVED Brother Scanner not detected by Sane]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=5093#p5093</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@greenjeans</p><p>Thanks, Xsane also fails.</p><p>@ralph.ronnquist</p><p>I think you have led me to find some mistakes. I think instead of the one line, I am missing comas and according to others it should be:</p><p>ATTR{idVendor}==&quot;0x04f9&quot;,<br />ATTR{idProduct}==&quot;0x0330&quot;,<br />GROUP:=&quot;scanner&quot;, Mode:=&quot;660&quot;</p><p>Now, I don&#039;t really know what I am doing here. Monkey see, monkey do <img src="https://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" />&#160; </p><p>Still not working though</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (rodancap)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 22:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=5093#p5093</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: SOLVED Brother Scanner not detected by Sane]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=5092#p5092</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m not too well versed in this, but I might be able to help.</p><p>Firstly, I think that your <span class="bbu">/etc/udev/rules.d/10-scanner.rules</span> should have a single rule line. It should be read &quot;if the vendor is <span class="bbu">0x04f9</span> and the product is <span class="bbu">0x0330</span>, then make the<span class="bbu"> /dev/whatever</span> pathname have group <span class="bbu">scanner</span>&quot;. All that needs to be on a single line.</p><p>What you have done is rather three independent statements: &quot;if the vendor is <span class="bbu">0x04f9</span>, then eeh nothing&quot;, &quot;if the product is <span class="bbu">0x0330</span>, then ehh nothing&quot;, &quot;if whatever, then set <span class="bbu">/dev/whatever</span> to have group <span class="bbu">scanner</span>&quot;. That last one in particular is quite &quot;destructive&quot; (although there might be some kind of protection in <span class="bbu">udev</span> for that kind of mistake).</p><p>But, when I look at the <span class="bbu">libsane</span> rules (i.e., <span class="bbu">/lib/udev/rules.d/60-libsane.rules</span>) it suggests that you should rather have the assignment </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>..., ENV{libsane_matched}=&quot;yes&quot;</code></pre></div><p>as effect instead of setting access group. I think the deal is that the scanner dev&#039;s (for whatever [expletive] reason) have decided to use &quot;acl&quot; rather than unix file protection, and they also have programmed their rules to use a common, actual effect via the setting of the <span class="bbu">libsane_matched</span> variable.</p><p>So, if making it a single line doesn&#039;t work, you might try replacing the GROUP assignment with that assignment.</p><p>EDIT: note the comma (&quot;,&quot;) between the terms; i.e., when you join your lines, you need to add &quot;,&quot; comma between them.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (ralph.ronnquist)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 22:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=5092#p5092</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: SOLVED Brother Scanner not detected by Sane]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=5091#p5091</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, don&#039;t use a scanner much, but i&#039;ve had the best luck using the Xsane frontend for saned.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (greenjeans)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 22:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=5091#p5091</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[SOLVED Brother Scanner not detected by Sane]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=5090#p5090</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi there</p><p>Neither Sane nor Simple Scan detect my brother all-in-one scanner HL L2380DW . I can print fine.</p><p>I am on Devuan GNU/Linux 1.0 (jessie), Mate desktop.</p><p>The drivers are installed:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>dpkg -l | grep Brother
ii  brgenml1lpr                                                 3.1.0-1                                    i386         Brother BrGenML1 LPR driver
ii  brscan-skey                                                 0.2.4-1                                    amd64        Brother Linux scanner S-KEY tool
ii  brscan4                                                     0.4.4-3                                    i386         Brother Scanner Driver
ii  printer-driver-brlaser                                      3-3                                        amd64        printer driver for (some) Brother laser printers
ii  printer-driver-ptouch                                       1.3-8                                      amd64        printer driver Brother P-touch label printers</code></pre></div><p>Sane only detects the scanner as root even though I added my user to the scanner group</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>sudo sane-find-scanner
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04f9 [Brother], product=0x0330 [HL-L2380DW]) at libusb:006:002</code></pre></div><p>As per internet instructions I created a file: /etc/udev/rules.d/10-scanner.rules with the following lines:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>ATTR{idVendor}==&quot;0x04f9&quot;
ATTR{idProduct}==&quot;0x0330&quot;
GROUP:=&quot;scanner&quot;</code></pre></div><p>I would appreciate some help. thanks !</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (rodancap)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=5090#p5090</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
