<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1122&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / Ceres minimal  .iso ...]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=1122</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Ceres minimal  .iso ....]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 10:46:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ceres minimal  .iso ...]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4931#p4931</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I understand the focus of Devuan is to make Debian work without systemd, not to fork from debian.&#160; The instant a distribution is forked it isn&#039;t ever coming back.&#160; Meanwhile debian has about 50,000 pkgs and a zillion package maintainers and developers working on them.&#160; It would be impossible to fork and maintain this capacity with a small group of people.&#160; Even with 500 pkgs installed in debian it is constantly raining updates with no intention to work without systemd.<br />I am not trying to come up with excuses for Devuan but I see this as part of what Debian SHOULD have been doing to be fair on its tradition.&#160; I believe debian died with wheezy and this is debian-systemd or debian2.&#160; Devuan is the continuation of true debian.</p><p>I wrote a small aricle in my site about how I think that debian is a specific fork of devuan.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fungus)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 10:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4931#p4931</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ceres minimal  .iso ...]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4929#p4929</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>There seems to be a disconnect between what Devuan is accomplishing (YEA!) and what some users want.</p><p>I noticed that there seemed to be an &quot;expectation&quot; in Devuan providing a truly &quot;free&quot; operating system; however, in listening to Jaromil&#039;s presentation at FSCONS 2016 (and unless I misunderstood him), that isn&#039;t the focus of Devuan. See the video here...https://youtu.be/wMvyOGawNwo</p><p>I, for one, am truly in awe of what the Devuan developers have accomplished (and are doing) in providing a systemd-free system. </p><p>While many may want newer software/applications, I&#039;m more than happy to use older software/applications that work rather than having to succumb to the web of systemd in order to have a few extra perks. Perhaps I&#039;m getting too old, and my age is showing...I don&#039;t know. Just give me something that works, and I&#039;m happy. <img src="https://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p><p>Thank you Devuan! <img src="https://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (MiyoLinux)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 03:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4929#p4929</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ceres minimal  .iso ...]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4927#p4927</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>golinux wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><div class="quotebox"><cite>zapper wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Why would anyone even want jessie now that debian 9 has been released?</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Because it&#039;s boringly stable and trouble-free.&#160; I will likely run it till 2020 eol.</p><p>It does have older packages, but if you like it that way then you should get the updates.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>zapper wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>We need to work on jessie too granted, but ascii is more important in my opinion.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>No new work is being done on jessie except for a few lingering pkgs in jessie-proposed.&#160; All attention is now focused on ascii.&#160; It&#039;s just that there hasn&#039;t been much focusing lately with August vacations etc.&#160; I keep hoping for some action . . .</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I am sure things will pick up eventually.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (zapper)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4927#p4927</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ceres minimal  .iso ...]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4926#p4926</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>greenjeans wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><div class="quotebox"><cite>zapper wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Why would anyone even want jessie now that debian 9 has been released?</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Couldn&#039;t tell ya, I don&#039;t use Debian and really wasn&#039;t waiting for them to release 9 to start doing so, you&#039;ll forgive me if I don&#039;t get that excited or ever even really pay attention to what Debian is doing and don&#039;t care. <img src="https://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p><div class="quotebox"><cite>zapper wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>We need to work on jessie too granted, but ascii is more important in my opinion.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Why?</p><p>Jessie is stable and works, it does every conceivable task I could ask a computer to do and does it well.&#160; By FAR the lion&#039;s share of users want <strong>exactly</strong> that, 99.9% of them couldn&#039;t even tell you what a kernel is, much less which one they are using. </p><p>The only people clamoring for the latest bleeding edge distro-breaking whizzbangs, are a very few users that need some newer firmware, and a bunch of hardcore linux geeks that must have the latest everything for reasons even they can&#039;t fully explain or understand.</p><p>Given those facts, it&#039;s more than a little ridiculous to try and lobby people like the VUA&#039;s (who are trying to make a nice stable operating system for folks to use), to give that up and focus solely on trying to break as many computers as possible with buggy untested unstable software.</p><p>Plenty of work to be done on the stable branch, it&#039;s just a stable canvas to work on, people haven&#039;t even begun to scratch the surface of what it can do, or how to put it together in new and better ways. </p><p>And not for nothing but there are plenty of things to fix left by buggy gnome and redbutt annoyance-ware, and if we keep avoiding those issues they will never get fixed, there are bugs in Mate that have been there for over <strong>5 years</strong> and before that in gnome2 and are STILL broken, while Mate actually <em>brags</em> (..shudder..) about switching to GTK3.....</p><p>Not gonna push the VUA&#039;s to do things any faster by making posts demanding they hurry up or by belittling the work they&#039;ve already done, just gonna piss &#039;em off eventually and delay things even more.. it&#039;s childish and it needs to stop. </p><p>People have no idea of the true mountainous amount of work that has to be done to put out a distro like Devuan, no idea at all.</p><p>Zapper, sorry, not all this is directed at you, just needed saying and you caught the short straw this time.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Don&#039;t worry about it,&#160; I don&#039;t judge you for this.&#160; it must be kind of frustrating not having any updates for a while.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (zapper)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4926#p4926</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ceres minimal  .iso ...]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4925#p4925</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>greenjeans wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Not gonna push the VUA&#039;s to do things any faster by making posts demanding they hurry up or by belittling the work they&#039;ve already done, just gonna piss &#039;em off . . .</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Those who are doing the work (other than the derivatives) rarely frequent this forum so they&#039;ll never see the bitching.&#160; But yes, it is childish and demonstrating a lack of understanding of all the moving parts that need to be coordinated.&#160; &#160;That being said . . . it has been more than frustrating that things ground to a halt last month while those in EU were on &#039;holiday&#039; and disheartening that things haven&#039;t started to pick up now that September is here . . .</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (golinux)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 23:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4925#p4925</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ceres minimal  .iso ...]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4923#p4923</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>zapper wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Why would anyone even want jessie now that debian 9 has been released?</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Couldn&#039;t tell ya, I don&#039;t use Debian and really wasn&#039;t waiting for them to release 9 to start doing so, you&#039;ll forgive me if I don&#039;t get that excited or ever even really pay attention to what Debian is doing and don&#039;t care. <img src="https://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p><div class="quotebox"><cite>zapper wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>We need to work on jessie too granted, but ascii is more important in my opinion.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Why?</p><p>Jessie is stable and works, it does every conceivable task I could ask a computer to do and does it well.&#160; By FAR the lion&#039;s share of users want <strong>exactly</strong> that, 99.9% of them couldn&#039;t even tell you what a kernel is, much less which one they are using. </p><p>The only people clamoring for the latest bleeding edge distro-breaking whizzbangs, are a very few users that need some newer firmware, and a bunch of hardcore linux geeks that must have the latest everything for reasons even they can&#039;t fully explain or understand.</p><p>Given those facts, it&#039;s more than a little ridiculous to try and lobby people like the VUA&#039;s (who are trying to make a nice stable operating system for folks to use), to give that up and focus solely on trying to break as many computers as possible with buggy untested unstable software.</p><p>Plenty of work to be done on the stable branch, it&#039;s just a stable canvas to work on, people haven&#039;t even begun to scratch the surface of what it can do, or how to put it together in new and better ways. </p><p>And not for nothing but there are plenty of things to fix left by buggy gnome and redbutt annoyance-ware, and if we keep avoiding those issues they will never get fixed, there are bugs in Mate that have been there for over <strong>5 years</strong> and before that in gnome2 and are STILL broken, while Mate actually <em>brags</em> (..shudder..) about switching to GTK3.....</p><p>Not gonna push the VUA&#039;s to do things any faster by making posts demanding they hurry up or by belittling the work they&#039;ve already done, just gonna piss &#039;em off eventually and delay things even more.. it&#039;s childish and it needs to stop. </p><p>People have no idea of the true mountainous amount of work that has to be done to put out a distro like Devuan, no idea at all.</p><p>Zapper, sorry, not all this is directed at you, just needed saying and you caught the short straw this time.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (greenjeans)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 22:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4923#p4923</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ceres minimal  .iso ...]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4922#p4922</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>zapper wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Why would anyone even want jessie now that debian 9 has been released?</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Because it&#039;s boringly stable and trouble-free.&#160; I will likely run it till 2020 eol.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>zapper wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>We need to work on jessie too granted, but ascii is more important in my opinion.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>No new work is being done on jessie except for a few lingering pkgs in jessie-proposed.&#160; All attention is now focused on ascii.&#160; It&#039;s just that there hasn&#039;t been much focusing lately with August vacations etc.&#160; I keep hoping for some action . . .</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (golinux)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 22:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4922#p4922</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ceres minimal  .iso ...]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4920#p4920</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>fungus wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>he did say &quot;busybox-syslogd and syslog-ng&quot; </p><p>I can&#039;t believe this is out for so long and nobody caught it.&#160; Ceres has a single repository, ascii has exactly the same repositories as jessie (security, update, etc).&#160; Just switch all your jessie lines into ascii.&#160; If you had looked at the proper web page it lists exactly the proper repositories.&#160; This is for future reference as too much time has gone by.</p><p>I have in a way parked all my devuan installations waiting for developers to deal with existing issues.<br />It appears that the summer siesta hasn&#039;t ended yet or things haven&#039;t gotten in a rolling mode again.<br />It appears as a strange decision to release Devuan 1 and then go on vacation, it just makes the project<br />look less professional, or serious.&#160; Maybe they should have waited for September.</p><p>In any case, those more serious about bug fixing seem to have concentrated on the list, after all they<br />are mostly debian escapees and they will not adopt to anything better.&#160; The logs of the list are next<br />to impossible to search and locate meaningful information.&#160; It has been that way on debian since the<br />stone age and remains the same in devuan.</p><p>Personally if it wasn&#039;t for the good work from refracta/fsmithred I would have lost all interest in this system.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Why would anyone even want jessie now that debian 9 has been released?</p><p>We need to work on jessie too granted, but ascii is more important in my opinion.</p><p>I think at some point devuan should get its repos the same way debian does, by itself. Though that may not happen for a long while I am betting. I am just saying, forking debian is a good temporary solution, but it should become independent at some point. long term imo.</p><p>PS, I use ceres now, and I am enjoying it thoroughly. Just a thunderbird/wicd-gtk and bleachbit error and enigmail error... otherwise it has been fine and exceptionally good.&#160; Good job on ceres and ascii devs! now I think you also need to work on jessie also.&#160; I hope you do this soon... <img src="https://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /> either way though, I will not give up on devuan for a long time if ever.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (zapper)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 21:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4920#p4920</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ceres minimal  .iso ...]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4914#p4914</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>he did say &quot;busybox-syslogd and syslog-ng&quot; </p><p>I can&#039;t believe this is out for so long and nobody caught it.&#160; Ceres has a single repository, ascii has exactly the same repositories as jessie (security, update, etc).&#160; Just switch all your jessie lines into ascii.&#160; If you had looked at the proper web page it lists exactly the proper repositories.&#160; This is for future reference as too much time has gone by.</p><p>I have in a way parked all my devuan installations waiting for developers to deal with existing issues.<br />It appears that the summer siesta hasn&#039;t ended yet or things haven&#039;t gotten in a rolling mode again.<br />It appears as a strange decision to release Devuan 1 and then go on vacation, it just makes the project<br />look less professional, or serious.&#160; Maybe they should have waited for September.</p><p>In any case, those more serious about bug fixing seem to have concentrated on the list, after all they<br />are mostly debian escapees and they will not adopt to anything better.&#160; The logs of the list are next<br />to impossible to search and locate meaningful information.&#160; It has been that way on debian since the<br />stone age and remains the same in devuan.</p><p>Personally if it wasn&#039;t for the good work from refracta/fsmithred I would have lost all interest in this system.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fungus)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 20:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4914#p4914</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ceres minimal  .iso ...]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4911#p4911</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>fsmithred wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Oh! I didn&#039;t know you could run without a syslogger. If you want one, there are two other choices that do work in ascii. busybox-syslogd and syslog-ng. (You don&#039;t need it often, but when you do, it&#039;s pretty important.)</p></div></blockquote></div><p>There are better syslogs you can use including a busybox version of syslog.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (zapper)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 01:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4911#p4911</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ceres minimal  .iso ...]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3325#p3325</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>judging from your attempt to go from stable to unstable skipping testing I think you should not go to ceres.<br />Somehow you seem to have dropped back to ascii and you are not broken.&#160; But if you had already gone to<br />ceres your packages may be ahead in time of what other ascii users are having, so check your list between<br />installed and available.&#160; There is a way to force the system to prefer packages of ascii instead of ceres, even<br />though they may have a higher version, but be cautious and don&#039;t fix things that are not broken.</p><p>I suspect the amount of knowledgeable people here active and available to give advise may be too busy or<br />not present all the time.&#160; So we may have to try to help each other, one-eyed and blind.</p><p>If I was an investor and linux-distros were in the market, I would put my money in devuan, it is the future!<br />I feel honored to be here so early and hope to contribute.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fungus)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 18:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3325#p3325</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ceres minimal  .iso ...]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3320#p3320</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>no one ?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Dev1)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 12:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3320#p3320</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ceres minimal  .iso ...]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3312#p3312</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi to @ll !</p><p>i&#039;m havin this inconvenient :&#160; <a href="http://imgur.com/ul0BFZT" rel="nofollow">http://imgur.com/ul0BFZT</a></p><p>it is a BUG ?</p><p>as always tia !</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Dev1)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 16:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3312#p3312</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ceres minimal  .iso ...]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3301#p3301</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Oh! I didn&#039;t know you could run without a syslogger. If you want one, there are two other choices that do work in ascii. busybox-syslogd and syslog-ng. (You don&#039;t need it often, but when you do, it&#039;s pretty important.)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 23:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3301#p3301</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ceres minimal  .iso ...]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3299#p3299</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>^</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code># apt purge rsyslog</code></pre></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Dev1)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 20:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3299#p3299</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
