<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;fid=8&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / Devuan]]></title>
		<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/index.php</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent topics at Dev1 Galaxy Forum.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 15:56:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] DEVELOPERS: Please repackage Devuan to install with secure boot on]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7925&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I was wrong:&#160; Windows 11 does not require secure boot to be on (enabled) to boot.&#160; I&#039;m not even sure it needs to be on for Windows to be installed.</p><p>After Devuan is installed make sure the shim packages are installed.&#160; If they are, it appears that it doesn&#039;t matter if secure boot is on or off.&#160; In order to install Devuan, turn secure boot off, but after it&#039;s up and running, it no longer appears to matter how it&#039;s set.&#160; In order to install nVidia drivers secure boot must be off or else you will have to supply the paths to both private and public keys.&#160; I don&#039;t know where those keys are kept, but the driver loaded with secure boot off and I&#039;m not going to fiddle with it any more.</p><p>My problem was actually something else entirely.&#160; Linux and VMD are incompatible.&#160; Turn VMD off in the UEFI/BIOS.&#160; Once it is off, the Devuan installer can detect the SSD(s) and you can partition them normally.</p><p>If you are dual booting an ASUS laptop (and maybe desktop) see this web page for valuable insights:&#160; <a href="https://asus-linux.org/guides/intro/" rel="nofollow">https://asus-linux.org/guides/intro/</a> </p><p>I also turned off hibernation and fast boot.&#160; Note these are Windows settings, not BIOS.&#160; There&#039;s another fast boot in UEFI/BIOS and just to be sure, I turned that one off, too.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (TNAndy)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 15:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7925&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Recent install]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7930&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Nice, thx @golinux, @fsmithred. This is helpful. I particularly like the return to old debian. Yes, when devuan forked, I was ambivalent. I wasn&#039;t that concerned, did systemd break things, not for a user who was only getting used to linux as daily driver, after all this time though, systemd&#039;s gone nuts, init just isn&#039;t that hard, which I guess they agreed with, cuz then they started getting their fingers into everything. The most recent ones that I noticed were logging (really?) and now birthdays? wow, talk about mixing concerns. Anyhow, I appreciate the banned packages list. Nothing concerning there. I&#039;ll be trying my new environment out with an eye toward a stronger move if it works out.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (decuser)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 21:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7930&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Age Verification]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7852&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Elyon:</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>This is just hilarious! It seems that the new released and highly praised EU Age Verification app got already hacked. And it took less than 2 minutes using only stock android app!</p><p><a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/eus-age-verification-app/" rel="nofollow">https://cybersecuritynews.com/eus-age-verification-app/</a></p><p>The arrogance of professional revolutionaries from the European Union announcing a groundbreaking application for the Union and the entire WORLD showed what clowns they are!</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VRRriyDKKk" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VRRriyDKKk</a></p></div></blockquote></div><p>They haven&#039;t released any app to begin with. They have a &quot;reference implementation of the Age Verification solution&quot; that you can build yourself for Android and iOS if you&#039;re interested in making a proper solution yourself.</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>This white-label application is a reference implementation of the Age Verification solution that should be customised before publishing it. The current version is not feature complete and will require further integration work before production deployment.</p></div></blockquote></div><p><a href="https://github.com/eu-digital-identity-wallet/av-app-android-wallet-ui" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/eu-digital-identity- … -wallet-ui</a><br /><a href="https://github.com/eu-digital-identity-wallet/av-app-ios-wallet-ui" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/eu-digital-identity- … -wallet-ui</a></p><p>But hey, who cares about the facts these days anyway. It seems to be more important to write articles that generate clicks and money. <img src="https://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Hund)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 21:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7852&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Devuan completely without systemd?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7919&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>And it is a waste of devuan resources to repeat the obvious for the umteenth time . . .</p><p>A picture is worth a thousand words:<br /><a href="https://pkgmaster.devuan.org/log/unstable-banned.svg" rel="nofollow">https://pkgmaster.devuan.org/log/unstable-banned.svg</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (golinux)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 02:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7919&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Seamless Devuan Project]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7895&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Ah, thanks!<br />Time to integrate it</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Daemonratte)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7895&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Devuan with....systemd!?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7905&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Basically, if you want systemd install Debian, but if you want freedom, use a systemd free distro - there are others as well as our favourite. <img src="https://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/big_smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="big_smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Camtaf)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 09:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7905&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Devuan plugged on YouTube]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7879&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Must be part of why the Artix forums got DDoS attacked the other day. They, along with Devuan and Slackware, have confirmed they will NOT &quot;verify&quot;.</p><p>See also this <a href="https://github.com/BryanLunduke/DoesItAgeVerify" rel="nofollow">page</a> on GNU/Linux distros and other OSes that have spoken about it (so far).</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (brocashelm)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 17:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7879&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Question about https://deb.devuan.org/]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7842&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>This is normal for apt, but I didn&#039;t always know that.&#160; It&#039;s confusing for users who may misjudge the security of the distro.</p><p>Here&#039;s what I see from Firefox:&#160; </p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>Be careful. Something doesn’t look right.</p><p>Firefox spotted a potentially serious security issue with deb.devuan.org. Someone pretending to be the site could try to steal things like credit card info, passwords, or emails.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I&#039;m not suggesting a change -- but I am sympathetic to those feeling troubled by this.&#160; File under &quot;https is a pain and it&#039;s not the only way to secure things&quot;.</p><p>[edit: To explain the above quote, DNS round robin came up with <a href="ftp://ftp.fau.de" rel="nofollow">ftp.fau.de</a> in this case, which correctly doesn&#039;t have a cert for deb.devuan.org.&#160; sledjhamr has a cert.</p><p>But have I misunderstood OP&#039;s concern?&#160; Was the concern that deb.devuan.org redirected to sledjhamr.org instead of sledjhamr.org/devuan/&#160; ?&#160; In that case, is the concern about equal for redirecting to <a href="ftp://ftp.fau.de" rel="nofollow">ftp.fau.de</a> instead of <a href="ftp://ftp.fau.de/devuan/" rel="nofollow">ftp.fau.de/devuan/</a> ?</p><p>Some mirrors are foo.blah.tld/ and some are foo.blah.tld/devuan.&#160; Apt must be handling that automatically. <br />]</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (scott)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 15:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7842&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Compliment on Devuan XFCE look and a question]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7874&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Like many of you I&#039;ve tried various flavors of Linux distros, mostly Debian based ones for me, and have seen XFCE look and feel pretty much the same in all those. Kind of a late 90&#039;s vibe but very functional.</p><p>How is the Devuan default of XFCE look so darn good? I&#039;m on Excalibur btw. Is it a custom theme or something? I like it better than most heavy DEs I&#039;ve tried. I&#039;m still two weeks in on my honeymoon phase but so far I really like this deployment.</p><p>Some examples...</p><p>Upper left drop down is cleaner than most XFCEs which try to bloat the launcher box. The icon choices are familiar but I don&#039;t remember them in XFCE previously. Were they from Plasma? The frames, the tone and the speed all just match. Normally XFCE attempts look like grandmas quilt.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (BruenorBattleHammer)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 13:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7874&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[systemd and age verification]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7865&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I honestly wouldn`t be surprised if all the data - including document scans - ended up in the hands of Indian scammers. We had a scandal like that in my country. Several MPs on an investigative committee, testified that they had seen DVDs containing data copied from the largest national census. But no one could explain what happened to those discs or where they ended up.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (slonik)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7865&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Devuan on PC replacing the smartness in smart TV]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7849&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve run a Linux PC on my TV&#039;s since 20 years and during this time Smart TV&#039;s have made their entrance . Since 7 years it&#039;s been only Devuan, of course. The UI on Smart TV&#039;s leave A LOT to be desired, I think. It&#039;s slow and cumbersome and eventually the TV can&#039;t be upgraded anymore.</p><p>My most recent example is a Samsung TV with relatively new software which very often lost contact with the net. You had to restart the TV all the time. And on top of that, the cumbersome UI.</p><p>A real Linux PC has many advantages; Easier configuration of the network (DNS in this case), easier to watch like Youtube without ads,&#160; if so inclined you can watch several shows, clips, videos at once. (Freedom). And play a game at the same time, and check your mail, and google stuff. And read the Devuan forum too.</p><p>With wireless keyboard and mouse, you can lay back in your couch and enjoy life.</p><p>And in this backwards world of ours, a TV without the &quot;Smartness&quot; would be more expensive than a TV with Smartness.</p><p>The one drawback, is that your mind might become even more fragmented. <img src="https://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /> <img src="https://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (swanson)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 06:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7849&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Devuan without elogind]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=5909&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@steve_v some of its good qualities exist in init programs like s6 or dinit.</p><p>I have in fact heard that was a purpose for s6, to do systemd on a lightweight level.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (zapper)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2026 09:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=5909&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Devuan 6.0 has no 32-bit edition?]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7810&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>One thing to bear in mind is that the baseline of required x86 extensions is raised on 6.0 so some userspace packages that worked on 5.0 may be incompatible with 6.0. In my case that includes Firefox on one PC.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (abower)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 14:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7810&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RISCV support]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=6900&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I will now sum up my findings (and then stop spamming this thread).</p><p>Devuan can be installed on the VisionFive 2 (v1.3b) with an EFI/Grub setup without problems using the mini.iso (see #6 above) copied to a USB. The installed system runs as intended.</p><p>The only (recommended) deviations from a normal install path are (i) use expert install, (ii) pre partition the target media with an EFI/ESP partition and (iii) use manual partitioning. (When using expert mode you will be asked to install Grub but not when using standard mode, it seems. In the latter case you need to go through the chroot steps outlined in #8 above.)</p><p>The above has been tested with Excalibur and install target on USB and nvme.</p><p>Several of the things I wrote/concluded in previous posts are u-boot dependent (and thus only apply to my particular setup). With a newer version of u-boot the install and management is simpler; in particular one can then use the <strong>bootflow</strong> command.</p><p>It is recommended to install a newer upstream/mainline version of u-boot &gt;= 2025.01 and to reset u-boot env. (I&#039;m on u-boot 2025.10 with openSBI 1.6 now.) It is also recommended to compile u-boot with a complete bootflow command, see <a href="https://docs.u-boot.org/en/latest/usage/cmd/bootflow.html" rel="nofollow">https://docs.u-boot.org/en/latest/usage … tflow.html</a> If you don&#039;t want to compile u-boot yourself, follow Debian&#039;s steps in the link in post #8. (The Debian pkg with u-boot for VF2 may however have the plain bootflow command, IDK.)</p><p>Notes: Cursor up/down problems in serial console (e.g. tio) can sometimes be resolved by deattaching the serial console, resetting the underlying terminal and then reattaching the serial console. (VF2 expects speed 115200.) There is a bug affecting u-boot&#039;s usb stability on the VF2 <a href="https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2025-November/603599.html" rel="nofollow">https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/ … 03599.html</a> The workaround is to first do a &quot;usb reset&quot; before any usb commands at the u-boot prompt.</p><p>Edit (260216): Freia works too; tested install to nvme. (Had to manually edit /etc/inittab and set </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>S0:23:respawn:/sbin/getty -L ttyS0 115200 screen</code></pre></div><p> to get serial console working).</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (tripole)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2026 16:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=6900&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Kde and Systemd - In the News]]></title>
			<link>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7785&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I can see both sides here, and at the risk of getting snarked at by Ralph and/or chewed out by Steve, lol, i&#039;m gonna post this.</p><p>I don&#039;t consider Devuan a &quot;distro&quot;, I consider it an online provider of Linux packages for me to use to build a distro. That&#039;s it. Possibly it might help some folks to look at it that way.</p><p>I consider it <strong>my</strong> job to update outdated packages when needed, add third-party software and some of my own apps, to fix little bugs and behavior, to dot the i&#039;s and cross the t&#039;s, to design the system to be user-friendly and stable.</p><p>Devuan&#039;s basically Home Depot, and i&#039;m a carpenter. Systemd is warped lumber and Debian is fine with forcing it on you, while Devuan chooses to pitch out as much of it as they can.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (greenjeans)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 20:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7785&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
