Chromium tries to detect the desktop and it will only show that message if it thinks it's running in GNOME. If you're running Xfce I think it will fall back to basic for the --password-store option, which doesn't need the keyring.

EDIT: and contrary to the OP's statement this problem was solved in their linked thread. I presume Altoid just has problems reading.

Here they are:

http://deb.devuan.org/devuan/pool/main/ … bar-theme/

http://deb.devuan.org/devuan/pool/main/ … con-theme/

So just

wget http://deb.devuan.org/devuan/pool/main/c/{cinnabar-icon-theme/cinnabar-icon-theme_1.1_all.deb,clearlooks-phenix-cinnabar-theme/{clearlooks-phenix-cinnabar-theme_7.0.1-5_all.deb,gtk3-nooverlayscrollbar_7.0.1-5_all.deb}}
for i in *.deb ; do sudo apt install ./"$i" ; done

EDIT: shortened wget command with bracket expansion.

I am not a "Devuan guy", I have absolutely nothing to do with the distribution itself. I'm just a random grumpy asshole. And I'm rude to everybody, not just the n00bs. Equality is important to me :-)

And my irritation was due to the sheer number of threads we have had here about this exact same subject. Being a n00b is fine, I'm one myself, but not searching the boards before posting is just criminal. IMO.

I don't need an excuse to be rude. The signature is there to stop people's feelings being hurt. Not that I care.

Have you read the manpage? See also https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo … bug=905409 ← there's an extensive discussion detailing the reasons for the change.

I think that's the clearlooks-phenix-cinnabar-theme package. EDIT: and cinnabar-icon-theme.

Fedora Silverblue:

I love the idea of an immutable base system with custom overlays but the disk usage is not cool. That system is just installed and it's already used up all 10GiB. Devuan uses 3-4GiB max, even with a full desktop. No surprise though, that's what happens when the applications are mostly flatpaks.

Oh, sorry.

There is no "image with nonfree drivers". I suspect you mean the image containing the non-free firmware. The non-free wl driver does not need firmware.

I presume by "6.0 kernel boot image" you actually mean the initramfs, is that correct?

We probably can't help without seeing the actual error message. My psychic powers have been waning lately...

And we might not be able to help at all. It's called "unstable" for a reason

Enter "bcm4331 debian" into a search engine. Surely you are aware of the existence of search engines?

BMW Motorcycles 100 Years by Andy Dowds. Top quality coffee table book. Very nice. It even has a good picture of the 1995 R850R on which I started my despatch career 20 years ago. Not the exact bike though, obviously.

And I've just learned from the book that apparently BMW also produce cars as a side-business to keep the motorcycle division properly funded. Interesting.

Edit /etc/inittab, here's the relevant section for my version in Alpine:

# Set up a couple of getty's
tty1::respawn:/sbin/agetty -a empty 38400 tty1
tty2::respawn:/sbin/getty 38400 tty2
tty3::respawn:/sbin/getty 38400 tty3
tty4::respawn:/sbin/getty 38400 tty4
tty5::respawn:/sbin/getty 38400 tty5
tty6::respawn:/sbin/getty 38400 tty6

^ So that runs agetty with the autologin option for my user on TTY1.

Obviously Devuan's file is different (I think it uses agetty by default) but the principle is the same.

What about all of the patches Debian apply to their kernel? And why would the kernel be any different to any other software? I wouldn't dream of using plain make install, even if a decent uninstall target is provided in the Makefile. It just seems so... crude to not use the provided packaging tools.

Although having said that Debian's packaging is so ridiculously complicated compared to, for example, Arch or Alpine that I can see why you might want to avoid it :-)

https://pkginfo.devuan.org/cgi-bin/poli … r&x=submit

And there's also samhein & tripwire, which are Suggests for the lynis package in Devuan.

EDIT: debsecan is another good one.