<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=8202&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / Recurring captcha from Google.]]></title>
		<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=8202</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Recurring captcha from Google..]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 18:28:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Recurring captcha from Google.]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65651#p65651</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>it may be irrelevant with the task at hand , but with captcha i normally click once twice forwared to get to the section where it asks me to pick from the 9 quadrants all several those that match the [requested] until finished.<br />i may be stupid but those other quesits where it asks me to select the quadrants where is a say a bike from a whole picture of 9 quadrants, i quite always dont succeed, it must be&#160; just too technical for me. (or i dont get the whole picture on those)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (kapqa)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 18:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65651#p65651</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Recurring captcha from Google.]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65647#p65647</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Advertizing companies are not exactly known for their honesty. They often make sure there&#039;s enough reports and articles in their favor on the web. It still sounds fishy and much like whitewashing to me. Privacy and adtech just don&#039;t mix together. But since Altoid&#039;s primary concern is avoiding ReCaptcha, I guess Startpage may fulfill that purpose.</p><p>DuckDuckGo is not very trustworthy either, though it seems to have a good search index. But like any other big project on the Internet, its ownership is very questionable and leaves much to be desired ethically.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Calamity)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 11:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65647#p65647</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Recurring captcha from Google.]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65645#p65645</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Well wikipedia writes the following about the startpage aquisition:</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>In October 2019, Privacy One Group, owned by adtech company System1, acquired a majority stake in Startpage. An initial lack of transparency surrounding the deal caused some concern among privacy researchers, leading to its removal from the PrivacyTools review website.</p><p>After responding to questions from PrivacyTools team members, Startpage was able to clarify that the acquisition would not impact their privacy-focused mission, and its recommendation was ultimately restored.</p><p>According to the company, its &quot;founders may unilaterally reject any potential technical change that could negatively affect user privacy&quot;.</p><p>By maintaining its headquarters and operations in the Netherlands, Startpage continues to be protected by Dutch and European Union (EU) privacy laws.</p></div></blockquote></div><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Startpage" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Startpage</a></p><p>so it still seems a good choice, definitely better than google search and duckduckgo (which I already wouldn&#039;t use because it&#039;s a US company and therefore subject to the Patriot act).</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (tux_99)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 11:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65645#p65645</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Recurring captcha from Google.]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65642#p65642</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Startpage was acquired by System1 (an ad company) via a company it registered for that purpose called &quot;Privacy One&quot;.&#160; System1 also acquired Waterfox. Both of these moves sparked some controversy and Waterfox was eventually independent again.</p><p>In my view, selling out privacy focused software projects to an ad company was not a smart move - and in the case of startpage, registering a deceptively named company for that purpose, hoping no one would notice, reveals the intent.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (blackhole)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 07:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65642#p65642</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Recurring captcha from Google.]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65641#p65641</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, System1 is the company that acquired Startpage circa 2018 (also Waterfox but their contract seems void now). Just look it up, it&#039;s quite out there in the open. I actually was using it for a bit before that date, once I found out they sold out I abandoned it. You&#039;ll probably end up leaking <em>more</em> data with Startpage now compared with bare Google.</p><p>I don&#039;t know why anyone would want to use G&#039;s services either, least of all directly. It&#039;s the same G as the one between the square and compass, if you know what I mean. There are still very decent alternatives out there for email, browsing etc. But a lot of traps as well.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Calamity)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 07:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65641#p65641</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Recurring captcha from Google.]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65639#p65639</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Srsly, some of you are using google for things?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (greenjeans)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 02:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65639#p65639</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Recurring captcha from Google.]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65638#p65638</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Re startpage (not necessarily trusted sources nor up-to-date):</p><p><a href="https://factually.co/fact-checks/technology/startpage-system1-ownership-privacy-risk-deep-dive-930c63" rel="nofollow">https://factually.co/fact-checks/techno … ive-930c63</a><br /><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System1" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System1</a><br /><a href="https://cyberinsider.com/startpage-system1-privacy-one-group/" rel="nofollow">https://cyberinsider.com/startpage-syst … one-group/</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (dzz)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 02:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65638#p65638</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Recurring captcha from Google.]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65635#p65635</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@Calamity do you have a source for that? <br />They always had ads, but their aren&#039;t personalized as they don&#039;t track their users.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (tux_99)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 23:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65635#p65635</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Recurring captcha from Google.]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65633#p65633</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>forgot to add, if you use dual-boot, need to check the tiem is &quot;correct&quot; this someit prevents things from happening in browserland.</p><p>and yes, different browser behave differently. am using satellite internet since few years and it has helped me solved quite some problems that otherwise would have taken me down the &quot;vpn&quot; route which is just cumbersome, not to speak of TOR, where does the captcha thing much more easily happen.<br />(it used to be difficult to achieve, now its just one click only solution, so probably not the big problem solver it is portrayed, but not in the know):</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (kapqa)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 21:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65633#p65633</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Recurring captcha from Google.]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65631#p65631</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If I recall correctly, Startpage now offers little anonymity over Google, if at all. They sold out to some advertizing company a few years ago.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Calamity)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 21:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65631#p65631</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Recurring captcha from Google.]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65629#p65629</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>rbit wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... difficulty with their picture captchas ...</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Thanks, but the difficulty is putting up with them when there is no reason.<br />I do not mind captchas when a site needs to use them to filter out bots and such.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>blackhole wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>If you use google services ...</p></div></blockquote></div><p>No, I don&#039;t use any of that.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>blackhole wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... that you give up and disable it, to allow their content.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Not until hell freezes over.<br />Twice. 8^°</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>tux_99 wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Just use <a href="https://startpage.com" rel="nofollow">https://startpage.com</a> ...</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Thanks, I&#039;ll have a look at that one.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>fsmithred wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... switched from firefox-esr to tor-browser and got right to the page I wanted.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Interesting, thanks.</p><p>Many years ago (2009/10?), when Tor was a new-ish thing, I downloaded it and had the bright idea to use it to log into my bank account from my netbook+office network, just like I did with my ministry issued PC. </p><p>Not a thing anyone was allowed to do but I could because I was in charge of 1st. tier TS for 60+ PCs. 8^°</p><p>Next morning I received a severely worded email from the bank summoning me to see my account officer -no option to decline the invitation- and when I got there the very annoyed chap told me that my PC had malware and that I had to sign this long waiver full of legalese because otherwise I would lose my account.</p><p>He did not have a clue so explaining all the protections my PC had in detail made no difference whatsoever.<br />So I signed the waiver and never used Tor again.<br />I recall that at that time it was rather slow to fetch pages.<br />But I will check it out.</p><p>The problem is that Google seems to have better/more complete search returns, or at least, more of them.<br />You (obviously) have to filter out the crap and this captcha thing is just the new recipe/texture/flavour available crap.<br />Unfortunately, I have the feelng that it will only get worse.</p><p>BTW:<br />Looking at the [about:config] from my LibreWolf I found these entries when I did a search for the term [captcha]:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>captchadetection.actor.enabled        true		
captchadetection.hasUnsubmittedData   true		
captchadetection.lastSubmission       1789597		
captchadetection.loglevel             Warn</code></pre></div><p>Any idea as to what these do?<br />The first and the fourth are default settings.<br />But the second and third are probably modified during each (?) session as they are in bold letters.</p><p>Thanks to all.</p><p>Best,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 21:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65629#p65629</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Recurring captcha from Google.]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65628#p65628</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I got that yesterday on a youtu.be link. After going through several screens of bicycles and busses (and clicking on every box that did NOT have what they asked me to identify) I clicked on boxes to form letters, one for each screen. Total of 7 letters, two words, to tell them how I felt about it. </p><p>Then I switched from firefox-esr to tor-browser and got right to the page I wanted.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 20:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65628#p65628</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Recurring captcha from Google.]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65626#p65626</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The captcha on 4get.ca is ... <em>idiosyncratic</em>. As someone said on AlternativeTo, it is &quot;based on the owner&#039;s interests&quot;. Minecraft is a very popular 3d block building game with pixel graphics (that&#039;s nowhere as good today as it used to be - use ClassiCube instead)... apparently the owner of 4get is a big fan of it. Actually, I have more questions about the <em>fumo plushies</em> part. The <em>&#039;IQ Test&#039;</em> caption is, evidently, a joke.</p><p>Well, take it or leave it. Behind the slight insanity, I found that it is a reliable service after all. Can&#039;t say the same about searx unfortunately, just when you think you found a good working instance it suddenly stops operating correctly and one is forced to find a new one, only for the same cycle to repeat itself soon after.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Calamity)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 20:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65626#p65626</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Recurring captcha from Google.]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65624#p65624</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Just use <a href="https://startpage.com" rel="nofollow">https://startpage.com</a> which is based on google search but provides you with a layer of anonymity, and I have never experienced captchas with startpage.com.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (tux_99)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 19:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65624#p65624</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Recurring captcha from Google.]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65623#p65623</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>a search engine proxy like <a href="https://4get.ca/" rel="nofollow">https://4get.ca/</a></p></div></blockquote></div><p>Thanks Calamity but.. the captcha here, presented as an &quot;IQ test&quot;, is: &quot;Pick 6 images from minecraft&quot; with no choice to load an alternative.</p><p>WTF is minecraft? (Is it a game?) My intelligence must be sub standard after all.</p><p>Anyway, point is, there are others e.g. searx instances.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (dzz)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 19:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65623#p65623</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
