<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=7791&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / XFCE is building a new WM and compositor for Wayland]]></title>
		<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7791</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in XFCE is building a new WM and compositor for Wayland.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: XFCE is building a new WM and compositor for Wayland]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62124#p62124</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the Devuan installer could mirror our concerns and offer more options during install.<br />Also when a fork is done , like MATE-&gt;CAFE it would help to know the reason and the projects intention. Was it license issues , roadmap differences etc.<br />I use a personally&#160; <a href="https://wiki.devuan.org/?n=Profiles.CuratedDesktops" rel="nofollow">curated desktop</a> :&#160; StumpWM + xfe + emacs + qutebrowser + weechat and xfce in my kid&#039;s computer.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (chomwitt)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62124#p62124</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: XFCE is building a new WM and compositor for Wayland]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62067#p62067</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Tumblerd can be optimized for sure, but what I also meant was that browsing such a large directory using Thunar can take its sweet time. Using SpaceFM, it&#039;s immediately functional.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (brocashelm)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 21:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62067#p62067</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: XFCE is building a new WM and compositor for Wayland]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62065#p62065</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>Thunar also takes centuries to load up thumbnails in a directory (such as Downloads). Older versions did not have this issue, and it didn&#039;t matter if you only had five files or five hundred -- everything loaded blinking fast.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Interesting, must not be caching thumbnails I guess? I have a script for that..... <img src="http://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (greenjeans)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 21:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62065#p62065</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: XFCE is building a new WM and compositor for Wayland]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62064#p62064</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s the GTK3 adoption that had made it a pretty sluggish DE in my experience. Thunar also takes centuries to load up thumbnails in a directory (such as Downloads). Older versions did not have this issue, and it didn&#039;t matter if you only had five files or five hundred -- everything loaded blinking fast.</p><p>With RAM prices getting ridiculous, it&#039;s not really an option to have to use a lighter WM or DE to cope with the resource hogging.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (brocashelm)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 21:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62064#p62064</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: XFCE is building a new WM and compositor for Wayland]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62062#p62062</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Aside from utterly messing up the scroll bars by default (disappearing, without up/down buttons, and warping the slider on click, each of which requires a completely different file to fix) I haven&#039;t seen much in recent Xfce that stood out as bad. It looks mostly as I remember it from years ago. What are people complaining about, exactly?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Mercury)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 20:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62062#p62062</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: XFCE is building a new WM and compositor for Wayland]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62023#p62023</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>With Xfce, you are not required to use their window manager (xfwm4); you can replace it with a different one. For a couple of ideas, consider using Openbox or IceWM (with the taskbar hidden) instead.</p><p>FYI:</p><p><strong>Using another Window Manager</strong><br /><a href="https://wiki.xfce.org/howto/other_window_manager" rel="nofollow"> https://wiki.xfce.org/howto/other_window_manager</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (pcalvert)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 19:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62023#p62023</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: XFCE is building a new WM and compositor for Wayland]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62020#p62020</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@Calamity @greenjeans&#160; I was LONG time XFCE user until their latest announcement. I have the same feeling that greenjeans mentioned above, so I moved to LXQt and Openbox. So far I am happy with LXQt, but what a shame the way XFCE went. It was going down hill for a while but this was the last straw.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (JayneCobb)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 16:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=62020#p62020</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: XFCE is building a new WM and compositor for Wayland]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=61934#p61934</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>But if my assessment is wrong then please enlighten me.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>You are right. But if they will adopt wayland and KDE will fall down with systemd cancer, then I&#039;ll be able to switch back to xfce <img src="http://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p><p>Wayland is not ready and will never be, but it has no problem with scalling and control when multiple displays set up is in place.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Devarch)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 19:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=61934#p61934</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: XFCE is building a new WM and compositor for Wayland]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=61905#p61905</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>To me, XFCE still has a few saving graces - it can look good and be unobtrusive, but I realize it&#039;s pretty much a sinking ship by now.<br />Will probably switch to IceWM or LXQt at some point given the circumstances.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Calamity)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 10:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=61905#p61905</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: XFCE is building a new WM and compositor for Wayland]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=61893#p61893</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I plan on trying it soon on a VM. CTK would at least mitigate much of the GN*ME stupidity along the way. I hope more GUI software will switch to it if they are hesitant on GTK4 or Qt.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>greenjeans wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>They need to roll back some Mate goofiness, particularly in Caja. And dump the damn mixer.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>There was an attempt to fork MATE as OpenMATE, but the author suddenly vanished (along with his GitHub repository). Totally not suspicious at all... 🤔</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (brocashelm)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 23:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=61893#p61893</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: XFCE is building a new WM and compositor for Wayland]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=61887#p61887</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>CAFE (fork of MATE) is doing, particularly CTK</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Oh yeah, I have the strangest b.......never mind, i&#039;m just excited.</p><p>They need to roll back some Mate goofiness, particularly in Caja. And dump the damn mixer.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (greenjeans)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 22:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=61887#p61887</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: XFCE is building a new WM and compositor for Wayland]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=61886#p61886</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, from recent experience it seems to go like this:</p><p>1. Hey we&#039;re adding support for wayland but we&#039;re still shipping X11.<br />2. Hey we&#039;re still shipping X11 but wayland is now the default.<br />3. Hey we&#039;re all in on wayland, but you can still use X11 if you jump through these 30 hoops and re-compile some stuff.<br />4. Hey we are discontinuing support for X11 for (your own) good.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (greenjeans)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 22:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=61886#p61886</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: XFCE is building a new WM and compositor for Wayland]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=61879#p61879</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thankfully, if we follow what <a href="https://github.com/cafe-desktop" rel="nofollow">CAFE</a> (fork of MATE) is doing, particularly <a href="https://github.com/cafe-desktop/ctk" rel="nofollow">CTK</a> (fork of GTK3), we just may be able to avoid GN*ME&#039;s further enshittification for the foreseeable future. You can also download the official DEB files <a href="https://github.com/cafe-desktop/debian-packages" rel="nofollow">here</a> if you don&#039;t want to or can&#039;t compile for some reason.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (brocashelm)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 21:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=61879#p61879</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: XFCE is building a new WM and compositor for Wayland]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=61878#p61878</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>bracashelm wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Xfce went downhill after 4.12.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Yes, a huge screw-up.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>bracashelm wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... it&#039;s going to get worse as GTK3 gets phased out ...</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Based on what we have seen, I think we can expect exactly that.</p><p>Pity ...</p><p>Best,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 21:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=61878#p61878</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: XFCE is building a new WM and compositor for Wayland]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=61873#p61873</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Why they are drinking the Wayland Kool-Aid is beyond me. Wayland has been in development for nearly two decades, yet it still can&#039;t do a couple of really essential things that X11 had already been doing since the 1990s.</p><p>Xfce went downhill after 4.12. It&#039;s no longer &quot;lightweight&quot; or &quot;fast&quot;. They should&#039;ve combined forces with MATE devs to fork and maintain GTK2, instead of just sucking up to GN*ME. Just watch, it&#039;s going to get worse as GTK3 gets phased out for GTK4, which will obliterate what few &quot;options&quot; users had then.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (brocashelm)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 20:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=61873#p61873</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
