<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=7479&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / [SOLVED] newer kernel needed. daedalus backports or excalibur?]]></title>
		<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7479</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in [SOLVED] newer kernel needed. daedalus backports or excalibur?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:01:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] newer kernel needed. daedalus backports or excalibur?]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58795#p58795</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks everyone, upgrade to excalibur went fine on my old test Notebook.<br />Will do the update on my produktive machine sometime thisweek.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (mclien)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58795#p58795</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] newer kernel needed. daedalus backports or excalibur?]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58779#p58779</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>Thanks, didn&#039;t know that. Good news, makes things a bit easier.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>May as well make it even easier and set it up with the new style file layout, this includes everything and works without problems. Move the sources.list to a backup to stop apt from complaining about duplicates.</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>root@9600k:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/devuan.sources 
# Devuan 6 excalibur
## The new style method of using repositories to install software.
## This /etc/apt/sources.list.d/devuan.sources is new style and location file
## The /etc/apt/old.style.sources.list contains the same as this.
## https://linuxconfig.org/ubuntus-repository-configuration-ubuntu-sources-have-moved-to-etc-apt-sources-list-d-ubuntu-sources

## Normal excalibur sources
Types: deb
URIs: http://gnlug.org/pub/devuan/merged 
Suites: excalibur excalibur-backports excalibur-proposed-updates  excalibur-updates
Components: main non-free contrib non-free-firmware
Enabled: yes
Signed-By: /usr/share/keyrings/devuan-archive-keyring.gpg
Architectures: amd64

## excalibur security sources
Types: deb
URIs: http://gnlug.org/pub/devuan/merged
Suites: excalibur-security
Components: main non-free contrib non-free-firmware
Enabled: yes
Signed-By: /usr/share/keyrings/devuan-archive-keyring.gpg
Architectures: amd64</code></pre></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (RedGreen925)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 19:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58779#p58779</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] newer kernel needed. daedalus backports or excalibur?]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58777#p58777</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>You can uncomment excalibur-security and excalibur-updates. They&#039;ve been active since around when trixie was released.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Thanks, didn&#039;t know that. Good news, makes things a bit easier.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (rolfie)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 18:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58777#p58777</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] newer kernel needed. daedalus backports or excalibur?]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58776#p58776</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>You can uncomment excalibur-security and excalibur-updates. They&#039;ve been active since around when trixie was released.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58776#p58776</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] newer kernel needed. daedalus backports or excalibur?]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58772#p58772</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (rolfie)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 15:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58772#p58772</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] newer kernel needed. daedalus backports or excalibur?]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58769#p58769</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the usrmerge hint.</p><p>So I change my sources.list to:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged excalibur main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
#deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged excalibur-security main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
#deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged excalibur-updates main contrib non-free non-free-firmware</code></pre></div><p>and upon release I uncomment the 2 lines and do another:&#160; ?</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>apt-get update &amp;&amp; apt-get upgrade</code></pre></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (mclien)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 14:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58769#p58769</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] newer kernel needed. daedalus backports or excalibur?]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58767#p58767</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>I tend to upgrade to excalibur. So I du just the usual?</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Not quite, there is one more thing to do and some remarks.<br />Before changing the sources to excalibur, you need to run the usrmerge app (I use apt instead of apt-get, I like the progress bar). If you don&#039;t do that you get an error message and the upgrade is stalled. </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code># apt install usrmerge</code></pre></div><p>Then, as long as Excalibur still is testing, the sources.list must contain just one line:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged/ excalibur main contrib non-free non-free-firmware</code></pre></div><p>And the usual precautions do apply: make a backup and remove/deactivate all foreign repos from your sources.list.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (rolfie)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 13:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58767#p58767</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] newer kernel needed. daedalus backports or excalibur?]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58765#p58765</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>mclien wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... any extra obstacles with excalibur?</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Yes.<br />A non-zero chance of there being <em>extra obstacles</em> <span class="bbu">is</span> to be expected with a testing Suite.<br />ie: Maintained but Not Released status</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>https://www.devuan.org/os/releases wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><ul><li><p>testing is where the next stable suite is developed. Software is usually more up-to-date but there may still be issues. testing becomes stable “<em>when it is ready</em>”.</p></li></ul></div></blockquote></div><div class="quotebox"><cite>rolfie wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Backports is the safe route, Excalibur means a slightly higher risk ...</p></div></blockquote></div><p>+1</p><p>Best,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 12:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58765#p58765</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] newer kernel needed. daedalus backports or excalibur?]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58762#p58762</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I tend to upgrade to excalibur. So I du just the usual?</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>apt-get update &amp;&amp; apt-get upgrade</code></pre></div><p>then replace daedalus with excalibur in the sources.list and then (I normally run that with no user logged in as root from the first text console)</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
apt-get dist-upgrade</code></pre></div><p>Or are there any extra obstacles with excalibur?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (mclien)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 12:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58762#p58762</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] newer kernel needed. daedalus backports or excalibur?]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58755#p58755</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>libc6 is upgraded with excalibur. BPO kernel here. Daedalus backports is on 6.12.43-1~bpo12+1 (2025-09-06)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (GlennW)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 22:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58755#p58755</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] newer kernel needed. daedalus backports or excalibur?]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58721#p58721</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Daedalus backports is on 6.12, as Excalibur. </p><p>Backports is the safe route, Excalibur means a slightly higher risk of ooups.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (rolfie)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 11:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58721#p58721</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] newer kernel needed. daedalus backports or excalibur?]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58720#p58720</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>HI,</p><p>I have my new system momentarily running. It might need a newer kernel. Hardware is announced to run with 6.8. and higher.</p><p>So I was thinking is there a newer kerne (6.1. is currently provided, if I&#039;m not mistaken) for daedalus?<br />Or do I upgrade to excalibur already, since it might be become stable soon enough? (bookworm to daedalus was ~2 months)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (mclien)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 09:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=58720#p58720</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
