<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=6288&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / /sbin/mount.nfs missing after an update]]></title>
		<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=6288</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in /sbin/mount.nfs missing after an update.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2023 15:45:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: /sbin/mount.nfs missing after an update]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=46563#p46563</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>How was the basic system installed? On current installations with newer releases you are getting asked if you want usr merge or not. I have always agreed to that to avoid hasle. <br />Or is that an upgrade from an older release before usr merge?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (rolfie)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2023 15:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=46563#p46563</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: /sbin/mount.nfs missing after an update]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=46546#p46546</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>You are probably right even though that &quot;decision&quot; is obviously not a reason for <em>changing</em> the installation pathname.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (ralph.ronnquist)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2023 00:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=46546#p46546</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: /sbin/mount.nfs missing after an update]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=46544#p46544</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they don&#039;t care anymore because of this: <a href="https://wiki.debian.org/UsrMerge" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.debian.org/UsrMerge</a>&#160; :&#160; In February 2021, the Technical Committee has resolved that Debian &#039;bookworm&#039; should support only the merged-usr root filesystem layout, dropping support for the non-merged-usr layout.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (bigcat)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2023 23:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=46544#p46544</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: /sbin/mount.nfs missing after an update]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=46540#p46540</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Apparently many debian packagers have decided to install stuff at different pathnames than before, which means that any script or program that has used full path is no longer working.</p><p>Likewise all existing documentation using the old pathnames is then outdated and wrong.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (ralph.ronnquist)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2023 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=46540#p46540</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[/sbin/mount.nfs missing after an update]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=46534#p46534</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Greetings all,&#160; I track devuan testing.&#160; Today after an update remote NFS would not mount on boot.&#160; &#160;Turns out /sbin/mount.nfs went missing.&#160; A symbolic link from /usr/sbin/mount.nfs has fixed this.</p><p>Does anyone know what is going on?&#160; I recall there was some old discussion about merged /usr directories in debian.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (bigcat)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2023 17:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=46534#p46534</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
