<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=6212&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / Using seatd in Chimaera]]></title>
		<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=6212</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Using seatd in Chimaera.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 16:21:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Using seatd in Chimaera]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=48570#p48570</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>*bump*</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/seatd wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>old-bpo: 0.7.0-6~bpo11+1<br />stable: 0.7.0-6<br />testing: 0.8.0-1<br />unstable: 0.8.0-1</p></div></blockquote></div><div class="quotebox"><cite>https://pkginfo.devuan.org/seatd wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>0.8.0-1+b1 ceres excalibur<br />0.7.0-6 daedalus<br />0.5.0-1 chimaera</p></div></blockquote></div><p>The Debian seatd source at <a href="https://sources.debian.org/src/seatd/0.7.0-6~bpo11+1/" rel="nofollow">//sources.debian.org/src/seatd/0.7.0-6~bpo11+1/</a> indicates the upstream sourcecode repository is <a href="https://git.devuan.org/devuan/seatd" rel="nofollow">//git.devuan.org/devuan/seatd</a></p><p>The <a href="https://git.devuan.org/devuan/seatd/tags" rel="nofollow">list of tags</a> has &quot;debian/0.7.0-6&quot; but no &quot;devuan/anything&quot; since 0.5.0-1 (despite daedalus,ceres,excalibur having newer versions), and also no tag matching the bullseye backport 0.7.0-6~bpo11+1.</p><p>So I&#039;m assuming that from 0.5.0-2 onwards both Debian and Devuan have been using the same version, and the only actual difference between <span class="bbc">seatd_0.7.0-6_amd64.deb</span> and <span class="bbc">seatd_0.7.0-6~bpo11+1_amd64.deb</span> are different libc versions used when compiling the binaries.</p><p>Is there any reason installing <span class="bbc">seatd_0.7.0-6~bpo11+1_amd64.deb</span> from bullseye-backports repo on a chimaera system will cause issues?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (boughtonp)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 16:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=48570#p48570</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Using seatd in Chimaera]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45980#p45980</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Looking at <a href="https://pkginfo.devuan.org/seatd" rel="nofollow">https://pkginfo.devuan.org/seatd</a> there&#039;s seatd is 0.7 for daedalus (bookworm), and 0.5 for chimaera (bullseye).<br />Contrasting that to <a href="https://packages.debian.org/seatd" rel="nofollow">https://packages.debian.org/seatd</a> where seatd is 0.7 for bookworm, and 0.7 for bullseye-backports.</p><p>The <a href="https://pkginfo.devuan.org/cgi-bin/package-query.html?c=package&amp;q=seatd=0.5.0-1" rel="nofollow">Devuan package page for 0.5.0-1</a> has &quot;Origin: Devuan&quot; which suggests it was manually added to Chimaera?</p><p>If so, is the manual addition preventing Amprolla from automatically pulling 0.7.0-6~bpo11+1 from bullseye-backports to chimaera-backports, or is there some other reason that this is not coming across?</p><p>Also, the dependencies for <a href="https://pkginfo.devuan.org/cgi-bin/package-query.html?c=package&amp;q=libseat1=0.7.0-6" rel="nofollow">libseat1</a> are <span class="bbc">seatd | logind, libc6 (&gt;= 2.33), libsystemd0 (&gt;= 238)</span> - shouldn&#039;t that be <span class="bbc">seatd | logind | libsystemd0 (&gt;= 238), libc6 (&gt;= 2.33)</span> ?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (boughtonp)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 16:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=45980#p45980</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
