<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=5986&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / [SOLVED] Shotwell dependency confusion]]></title>
		<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=5986</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in [SOLVED] Shotwell dependency confusion.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 19:43:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Shotwell dependency confusion]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44334#p44334</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I had another go at the problem today and although I do not understand the fine points of why or how, I now have Shotwell up and running.<br />Yesterday, apt thought that dconf-cli version 0.38 was available - but a dependency was libdconf1 0.38. My libdconf1 was already at 0.40 so apt refused to load dconf-cli. Synaptic knew dconf-cli existed but had no details of any sort for it.</p><p>Today, Synaptic agreed that dconf-cli 0.38 was the latest version but refused to load with an error message that I interpreted as that it could not find the file. I dug around in the devuan repository and found that 0.40 of dconf-cli should be available and it referenced the debian repository. I searched through the debian repository and found the 0.40 file, downloaded it and used dpkg to install it.&#160; Synaptic is now happy that 0.40 of both dconf-cli and libdconf1 are available and installed and Shotwell installed happily.</p><p>I guess the problem was probably something to do with the database files for apt and Synaptic on my system not updating properly but I certainly don&#039;t know that. I could find nothing in preferences that would prevent that updating. I would have liked to understand what was actually wrong and cannot pretend my solution is anything other than a cludge but it works so I am happy.</p><p>Thank you all for your thoughts, suggestions and helpful info. My Shotwell version is now 0.30.17-1+b1 from stable. I will try gtkam as my next experiment.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (EnglishMohican)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 19:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44334#p44334</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Shotwell dependency confusion]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44330#p44330</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I also upgraded from Chimaera, using Cinnamon as DM and (automatically upgraded) Shotwell is working.<br />I note both my version of Shotwell and my Depends libraries differ from Dutch Master in that the version numbers are higher.</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>marjorie@grendel:~$ apt show shotwell
Package: shotwell
Version: 0.30.17-1+b1
Priority: optional
Section: gnome
Source: shotwell (0.30.17-1)
Maintainer: Jörg Frings-Fürst &lt;debian@jff.email&gt;
Installed-Size: 6,699 kB
Depends: libc6 (&gt;= 2.34), libcairo-gobject2 (&gt;= 1.10.0), libcairo2 (&gt;= 1.2.4), libexif12 (&gt;= 0.6.21-1~), libgcr-base-3-1 (&gt;= 3.8.0), libgcr-ui-3-1 (&gt;= 3.8.0), libgdata22 (&gt;= 0.15.0), libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 (&gt;= 2.25.2), libgee-0.8-2 (&gt;= 0.10.1), libgexiv2-2 (&gt;= 0.10.4), libglib2.0-0 (&gt;= 2.49.5), libgphoto2-6 (&gt;= 2.5.10), libgphoto2-port12 (&gt;= 2.5.10), libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 (&gt;= 1.0.0), libgstreamer1.0-0 (&gt;= 1.0.0), libgtk-3-0 (&gt;= 3.21.5), libgudev-1.0-0 (&gt;= 146), libjson-glib-1.0-0 (&gt;= 1.5.2), libpango-1.0-0 (&gt;= 1.18.0), libpangocairo-1.0-0 (&gt;= 1.14.0), libraw20 (&gt;= 0.16.0), libsoup2.4-1 (&gt;= 2.41.90), libsqlite3-0 (&gt;= 3.5.9), libunity9 (&gt;= 3.4.6), libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37 (&gt;= 2.25.1), libxml2 (&gt;= 2.7.4), shotwell-common (= 0.30.17-1), dconf-cli, default-dbus-session-bus | dbus-session-bus, librsvg2-common
Replaces: shotwell-common (&lt;&lt; 0.26.2-1)
Homepage: https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Shotwell
Tag: implemented-in::c, interface::graphical, interface::x11, role::program,
 uitoolkit::gtk, use::organizing, use::viewing, works-with-format::jpg,
 works-with::image, works-with::image:raster, x11::application
Download-Size: 1,863 kB
APT-Manual-Installed: no
APT-Sources: http://deb.devuan.org/merged daedalus/main amd64 Packages
Description: digital photo organizer</code></pre></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Marjorie)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 19:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44330#p44330</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Shotwell dependency confusion]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44310#p44310</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>No solution, just some thoughts:</p><p>&quot;libdconf1=0.38.0-2&quot; looks like chimaera. Maybe something is left-over? (packages on hold? Or pinning in /etc/apt/preferecenes)?</p><p>ntpd: on one system upgraded to daedalus I did: <span class="bbc">apt purge ntp; apt install ntpsec</span>.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (delgado)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 13:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44310#p44310</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Shotwell dependency confusion]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44277#p44277</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m using Mate and have Shotwell running just fine.</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>root@desktop:/home/&lt;user&gt;# apt show shotwell
Package: shotwell
Version: 0.30.11-1
Priority: optional
Section: gnome
Maintainer: Jörg Frings-Fürst &lt;debian@jff.email&gt;
Installed-Size: 6,606 kB
Depends: libc6 (&gt;= 2.29), libcairo-gobject2 (&gt;= 1.10.0), libcairo2 (&gt;= 1.2.4), libexif12 (&gt;= 0.6.21-1~),
 libgcr-base-3-1 (&gt;= 3.8.0), libgcr-ui-3-1 (&gt;= 3.8.0), libgdata22 (&gt;= 0.15.0), libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 (&gt;= 2.25.2),
 libgee-0.8-2 (&gt;= 0.10.1), libgexiv2-2 (&gt;= 0.10.4), libglib2.0-0 (&gt;= 2.49.5), libgphoto2-6 (&gt;= 2.5.10),
 libgphoto2-port12 (&gt;= 2.5.10), libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 (&gt;= 1.0.0), libgstreamer1.0-0 (&gt;= 1.0.0), libgtk-3-0 (&gt;= 3.21.5),
 libgudev-1.0-0 (&gt;= 146), libjson-glib-1.0-0 (&gt;= 1.5.2), libpango-1.0-0 (&gt;= 1.18.0), libpangocairo-1.0-0 (&gt;= 1.14.0), libraw20 (&gt;= 0.16.0),
 libsoup2.4-1 (&gt;= 2.41.90), libsqlite3-0 (&gt;= 3.5.9), libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37 (&gt;= 2.25.1), libxml2 (&gt;= 2.7.4), shotwell-common (= 0.30.11-1),
 dconf-cli, default-dbus-session-bus | dbus-session-bus, librsvg2-common
Replaces: shotwell-common (&lt;&lt; 0.26.2-1)
&lt;snip&gt;
Download-Size: 1,826 kB
APT-Manual-Installed: yes
APT-Sources: http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged stable/main amd64 Packages</code></pre></div><p>I&#039;m not sure I upgraded to the latest stable release yet, so I might still be on Old-Stable.</p><p>HTH!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Dutch_Master)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 22:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44277#p44277</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Shotwell dependency confusion]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44274#p44274</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I don&#039;t have a solution just my experience . . .</p><p>A very long time ago in simpler times, I used shotwell and liked it. Then it started to not-shot-so-well. Went around and around on their mailing list. Nothing I tried fixed it&#160; I moved on to gtkam . . .</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (golinux)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 21:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44274#p44274</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] Shotwell dependency confusion]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44271#p44271</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to install Shotwell. So far I have tried synaptic, apt and aptitude and all of them refuse because of broken/missing/held packages. They don&#039;t quite agree on what the problem is. Synaptic says it needs either default-dbus-session-bus or dbus-session-bus, Aptitude and apt sort of agree that dconf-cli is the problem.</p><p>I found an old post that said that dbus-session-bus was provided by dbus-X11 which I do have installed.</p><p>dconf-cli is listed in the repository lists but has no data against it.</p><p>Apt flags up that my libdconf1 is at 0.40.0-4 but dconf-cli depends on libdconf1=0.38.0-2. I do not understand how it knows that when there is no data against the dconf-cli entry in Synaptic.&#160; I tried to downgrade libdconf1 using Synaptic but it wants to remove most of the software on my laptop as part of the deal.</p><p>I am running Devuan Daedalus with xfce4, all updates applied. It was originally&#160; Chimaera which I updated by changing the repository lists in Synaptic. This has caused one problem already - the update process dropped the ntp set of packages but did not install the ntpsec set of packages to replace it - at least that seemed to be the problem. I mention this because it could be a clue.</p><p>Mostly, I do not understand the problem. I have three package managers that tell me different problems, none of which seem totally reasonable. I would like an explanation of what the real problem is and why the package managers see it differently (just for my education) and ideally a simple means of correcting things and getting Shotwell installed.</p><p>Thank you for reading as far as this and for any help you can provide.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (EnglishMohican)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 20:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=44271#p44271</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
