<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=5643&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / AI+ML article in ElReg]]></title>
		<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=5643</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in AI+ML article in ElReg.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2023 16:22:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: AI+ML article in ElReg]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=41757#p41757</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>China (and other countries) will also be developing LLM and other AI systems. So any moratorium only lets China etc get a head start.</p><p>I can&#039;t think of a good option. But allowing Microsoft and Google to carry on as they wish is probably the least bad.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (chris2be8)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2023 16:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=41757#p41757</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AI+ML article in ElReg]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=41751#p41751</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><p>----<br />In the battle between Microsoft and Google, LLM is the weapon too deadly to use<br />The only winning move is not to play<br />by Rupert Goodwins <a href="https://www.theregister.com/2023/04/03/opinion_column/?td=rt-3a" rel="nofollow">@theregister</a><br />----</p><p>Best,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2023 10:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=41751#p41751</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
