<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=5178&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / Lightdm package changed Grub.]]></title>
		<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=5178</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Lightdm package changed Grub..]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 19:12:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Lightdm package changed Grub.]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=37147#p37147</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think package name must say everything without having to tweak the package manager, or it must be called a meta-package. My grub can run two distros so it is no tied to a particular display manager. This is not about minimalism, I lack Linux skills to build a distro from minimal install. Tiling window managers is just efficient and time saver. If a distro provides a clean bspwm out of the box with lightdm I&#039;d never touch these stuff.</p><p>But your opinion is fine, it is just a different philosophy.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (drito)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 19:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=37147#p37147</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Lightdm package changed Grub.]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=37140#p37140</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>drito wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>I advise to use this option everytime.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Not installing Recommends will lead to reduced or just plain broken functionality for most users.</p><p>IMO configuring the bootloader so that the theme is consistent with the new display manager seems sensible, and even perhaps a really nice idea. Purists wouldn&#039;t dream of installing bloat like display managers anyway.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Head_on_a_Stick)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 15:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=37140#p37140</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Lightdm package changed Grub.]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=37133#p37133</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>To make --no-install-recommends the default for your system,</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>echo &#039;APT::Install-Recommends &quot;0&quot;;&#039; &gt; /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/00norecommends</code></pre></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2022 23:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=37133#p37133</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Lightdm package changed Grub.]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=37132#p37132</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I advise to use this option everytime. Stupid people like me read &quot;apt install lightdm&quot; so I expect lightdm to be installed, period, and not the full graphical stack. There is even a &quot;systemd&quot; recommended package in some package, I don&#039;t remember the name sorry. <br />The Devuan people are nice and helpful, but I have to install a sane distro. <br />Its sad, Debian seems to be the only distro that aims to be stable, but they stupidly break stuff with their insane packages. All my Guix packages was broken by lightdm additional bloat. I used several flavours of Arch and this thing never happened. Sorry for the rant.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (drito)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2022 22:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=37132#p37132</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Lightdm package changed Grub.]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=37131#p37131</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Without more information,&#160; my guess (based on my own experience) is that...</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>apt install lightdm</code></pre></div><p>...was used (if installed via a terminal).</p><p>If so, my guess (also based on my own experience) is that the package <span class="bbc">desktop-base</span> was also pulled in with that command, which will change the grub theme. </p><p>If you ever try again, use the command...</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>apt install lightdm --no-install-recommends</code></pre></div><p>...in order to avoid pulling in <span class="bbc">desktop-base</span>.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (MiyoLinux)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2022 21:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=37131#p37131</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lightdm package changed Grub.]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=37121#p37121</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello. I installed a minimal Devuan to get bspwm, then I installed Lightdm using apt.<br />After the restart the Grub screen has changed. It looks better but it is unexpected.<br />Questions:<br />Is it a behaviour from Devuan or from Debian ?<br />Is there some relation between Grub and Lightdm that required a Grub update or is it just a bloated package ?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (drito)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2022 12:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=37121#p37121</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
