<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=4925&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / [SOLVED] Devuan chimaera is better at gaming than artix on my low end laptop]]></title>
		<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=4925</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in [SOLVED] Devuan chimaera is better at gaming than artix on my low end laptop.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2022 19:58:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Devuan chimaera is better at gaming than artix on my low end laptop]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35172#p35172</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Head_on_a_Stick wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Have you seen <a href="https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Improving_performance" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Improving_performance</a>? Not sure how much Artix does in respect of optimisation but you might be able to squeeze a bit more from it.</p><p>I find Debian &amp; Arch to be almost identical in respect of gaming performance with amdgpu (both are better than Windows) but Debian is &quot;lighter&quot; than Arch generally.</p><p>EDIT: I use the <span class="bbc">cpufreq.default_governor=performance</span> kernel command line parameter, that might help you if you&#039;re not bothered by the reduced battery life (only for kernel &gt;5.9). And <span class="bbc">mitigations=off</span> but don&#039;t try that with Intel :-)</p><p><a href="https://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_5.9#CPU_Frequency_scaling" rel="nofollow">https://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_5.9#CPU … cy_scaling</a></p></div></blockquote></div><p>I use gamemode. I think it already does that governor thing isn&#039;t it?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (recklessswing)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2022 19:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35172#p35172</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Devuan chimaera is better at gaming than artix on my low end laptop]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35045#p35045</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen <a href="https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Improving_performance" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Improving_performance</a>? Not sure how much Artix does in respect of optimisation but you might be able to squeeze a bit more from it.</p><p>I find Debian &amp; Arch to be almost identical in respect of gaming performance with amdgpu (both are better than Windows) but Debian is &quot;lighter&quot; than Arch generally.</p><p>EDIT: I use the <span class="bbc">cpufreq.default_governor=performance</span> kernel command line parameter, that might help you if you&#039;re not bothered by the reduced battery life (only for kernel &gt;5.9). And <span class="bbc">mitigations=off</span> but don&#039;t try that with Intel :-)</p><p><a href="https://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_5.9#CPU_Frequency_scaling" rel="nofollow">https://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_5.9#CPU … cy_scaling</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Head_on_a_Stick)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2022 22:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35045#p35045</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] Devuan chimaera is better at gaming than artix on my low end laptop]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35044#p35044</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I dual boot with artix. And, devuan stable was both better, and also cooler. Devuan was around 54 C max, whereas artix, 62 C. And FPS was better, and much less stutter either way. The game I used is wow wotlk 3.3.5a, playing on a private server(I play sometimes for nostalgia). I got around 45-50 fps, awesome for this laptop right?</p><p>For artix I used the linux-zen kernel, but I use stock kernel in devuan maybe that&#039;s why. I will test again with stock arch kernel later.</p><p>This is my system info. Pretty potato pc right?</p><p>System:<br />&#160; Host: devuan Kernel: 5.10.0-11-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.16.0 <br />&#160; Distro: Devuan GNU/Linux 4 (chimaera) <br />Machine:<br />&#160; Type: Laptop System: SAMSUNG product: R518 v: N/A <br />&#160; Mobo: SAMSUNG model: R518 serial: &lt;superuser required&gt; BIOS: Phoenix <br />&#160; v: 03LC.M026.20091116.Jay date: 11/16/2009 <br />CPU:<br />&#160; Info: Dual Core model: Intel Core2 Duo P7450 bits: 64 type: MCP <br />&#160; L2 cache: 3 MiB <br />&#160; Speed: 1595 MHz min/max: N/A Core speeds (MHz): 1: 1595 2: 1596 <br />Graphics:<br />&#160; Device-1: AMD RV710/M92 [Mobility Radeon HD 4330/4350/4550] driver: radeon <br />&#160; v: kernel <br />&#160; Device-2: Z-Star Micro Namuga 1.3M Webcam type: USB driver: uvcvideo <br />&#160; Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.11 driver: loaded: ati,radeon <br />&#160; unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa resolution: 1366x768~60Hz <br />&#160; OpenGL: renderer: AMD RV710 (DRM 2.50.0 / 5.10.0-11-amd64 LLVM 11.0.1) <br />&#160; v: 3.3 Mesa 20.3.5 <br />Info:<br />&#160; Processes: 196 Uptime: 36m Memory: 3.81 GiB used: 1.6 GiB (42.0%)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (recklessswing)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2022 21:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35044#p35044</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
