If you don't like the behavior of "update-alternatives" there may be a way to change it. (This is probably why some may have suggested reading man pages)  If you think the default behavior should change, there may be a way to open a bug upstream (Debian)

That said, I get that this is a potential user experience issue, but I don't believe the Devuan developers should be on the hook for changing the way "update-alternatives" works. It is, however, acceptable for them to (pre) check only certain boxes in "tasksel" during install. This is what they've done to select XFCE. (This is what the Debian Project does for the default DE, as well) The Devuan developers focus should be making the INIT systems work well with minimal changes/impact to the behavior to rest of the system.

Remember, we are here because of needless and overreaching changes to the OS, lets be careful not to fall prey to that pitfall as well.

You do nothing, you just complain.

I'll let that slide, because I haven't linked my forum account anywhere. So, this is the FOSS coding I do. No, none of it is Devuan and it's already more than I can handle.

But you should be aware that your rhetoric is highly confrontational and derogatory.

And what do I look like to you?

You do nothing, you just complain. So I do not count you as a developer.
You do not even write bug reports, which is the correct way to report bugs if you want to contribute to the development of GNU-Linux/Debian/Devuan.

is mostly done by volunteers on a non-profit basis,

And what do I look like to you?

People on the IRC channel ask me to make sure and report any issues when I install Chimaera. So I do, and I get this flak. Why? I didn't report this as a demand for a fix.

It's mostly the opposite. Even a person who is an actual programmer can only devote time to work on a very small number of software projects. So, it is more true to say that if you want other solutions than those offered, you mostly cannot and will not ever be able to make them yourself.

We make things for others and others make things for us. That's how it works.

You are welcome to provide a patch upstream to offer the option(s) you suggest. 

Since GNU-Linux/Debian/Devuan is mostly done by volunteers on a non-profit basis, you can not require them to do anything other than what they are interested in. This means that they skip things they think are unnecessary, such as user-friendliness. Therefore, the use of GNU-Linux/Debian/Devuan requires a great willingness to acquire their own knowledge. This must be respected. If not, then there is Windows. And if you want other solutions than those offered, you have to make them yourself. That's how it works.

The user does not get to control the order of package installation during the install of the operating system. That's up to the package manager

The order of package installation is indeed something the user doesn't care about. The default desktop environment is something the person performing the installation (might) care about - but is not given the opportunity to set.

Also, regardless of that - the distribution authors should care about what the default desktop environment is; and it is not reasonable policy for it to be "whatever happens to be installed last".

Finally, be the policy as it may - during installation, the installer should tell you "the default desktop environment will be XYZ", based on your selections up to that point.

I'm saying it shouldn't matter...

No. That is, a WM selection means it is loaded and I am not asked about. Just like with the desktop environment: A default choice is made for the user, and unless s/he does something to change it - it sticks.

That is the problem. It is not acceptable IMHO for this to occur. Putting the user in front of such a selection dialog before they can be logged in to their first session is jarring and intimidating, and suggests there is a problem with the installation. If the LXQt devs have mistakenly done this, it is up to the distro to make sure that is bypassed and no such choice is required.

Also, the jarring effect is not mitigated by a more friendly dialog, saying something like: "This is your first time starting the LXQt desktop environment. LXQt is currently configured to use the Muffin Window Manager; would you like to proceed with this selection? [No - Change Window Manager] [Yes]"

I will, but this is also IMHO a distribution bug, because Debian/Devuan can quash/circumvent this select dialog - and it should. Plus, as I've said above, there should be a more explicit default DE policy.

LXQt was probably the last desktop to be installed

But there is no user-acknowledged notion of a "last desktop environment to be installed".

so the alternatives system set it as the default, thus replacing any previous default settings.  That's normal behavior of the alternatives system.

But is this the intended Debian/Devuan policy? That is, Devuan defaults to xfce4. If one installs xfce4 + something else, should Devuan default to not-xfce4? And not just that, but have a priority order of defaults based on the order of package installation? Surely that's not right.

The user does not get to control the order of package installation during the install of the operating system. That's up to the package manager, which has to resolve dependencies of the chosen metapackages. The behavior of the alternatives system will make more sense when you read the man page for update-alternatives.

In fact, a default window manager was selected for you. The lxqt devs thought they should double-check with you, because you had more than one window manager installed. They presented you with a list, and on that list the pre-selected window manager was highlighted. All you had to do was press enter or click OK. If you think that behavior should change, you could file a bug report. I'm guessing that behavior comes from the lxqt authors, upstream of debian.

LXQt was probably the last desktop to be installed

But there is no user-acknowledged notion of a "last desktop environment to be installed".

But is this the intended Debian/Devuan policy? That is, Devuan defaults to xfce4. If one installs xfce4 + something else, should Devuan default to not-xfce4? And not just that, but have a priority order of defaults based on the order of package installation? Surely that's not right.

And again - even suppose it's legitimate to set LXQt as the default desktop environment. Then, surely a default window manager should be set and used, rather than the user faced with a forced selection dialog.

That's not the point of the issues I'm reporting. Of course I can change things. The issue is what should happen during/after installation, as by default, before the user has changed anything.

My tasks were:

task-cinnamon-desktop task-console-productivity task-desktop task-english task-lxqt-desktop task-ssh-server task-xfce-desktop

fsmithred wrote:

The current chimaera installer isos (and live isos) are alpha level. They should work essentially the same as previous installer isos. That they don't is no surprise. The default desktop is supposed to be xfce, and if you select something else, you should get what you select.

I didn't select LXQt as my default desktop environment; although I did select multiple desktop environment for installation.

Plus, even if I had selected it to be the default during installation - there should still be an automatic selection of window manager for the user on their first login. Either that, or the installation should mandate making that selection beforehand.

LXQt was probably the last desktop to be installed, so the alternatives system set it as the default, thus replacing any previous default settings. That's normal behavior of the alternatives system. You can change the default desktop by running update-alternatives --config x-session-manager and if needed, you can change the default window manager with update-alternatives --config x-window-manager

If you only install one desktop environment, you get that desktop's default window manager automatically. If you have multiple window managers installed, the desktop software has the logic coded into it to ask you if the additional window manager is there because you want to use it.

Installiing multiple desktop environments used to be a simple matter. But that doesn't seem to be the case now. It would work better if they were installed one at a time, so any conflicts might be more apparent.

Look in /var/log/installer/syslog for task-xfce-desktop task-cinnamon-desktop and task-lxqt-desktop to see which were checked at the tasksel window in the installer.

The current chimaera installer isos (and live isos) are alpha level. They should work essentially the same as previous installer isos. That they don't is no surprise. The default desktop is supposed to be xfce, and if you select something else, you should get what you select.

I didn't select LXQt as my default desktop environment; although I did select multiple desktop environment for installation.

Plus, even if I had selected it to be the default during installation - there should still be an automatic selection of window manager for the user on their first login. Either that, or the installation should mandate making that selection beforehand.

What was your intention? Just install Chimaera with XFCE as desktop? Or did you want to install several DEs?
...
My guess: you may have ticked more than one DE. This may go along with several Window Managers.

Yes, I had checked several desktop environments. That's a perfectly reasonable and acceptable thing to do.

Well, that's not the typical scenario...

It doesn't make sense to expect that people not-select offered installation tasks... and the way to handle such an issue is to fix the installation, not to tell users to go look up things in the manual...

And just to clarify - I'm not asking for help, I've managed just fine; I just want the installation and post-installation behavior to be smoother and more reasonable for other users.

I have done various Chimaera installations by now, and have not experienced such problems. Well, I usually do a cli install and then after a reboot do install either Mate or Cinnamon manually. Nevertheless, to do that I have to untick the default selections.

On page https://www.devuan.org/os/documentation … all-devuan there is a nice guide including screenshots of all the relevant installer pages. Please refer to topic 17. I think the screenshot misses the tick for XFCE as default. I usually just leave the standard system utilities ticked and do the rest manually.

My guess: you may have ticked more than one DE. This may go along with several Window Managers. There is a list somewhere which DE per default uses which WM. For Mate and Cinnamon I happily use LightDM.

rolfie