<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=4095&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / SOLVED: Issues using "live" install on Thinkpad T410]]></title>
		<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=4095</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in SOLVED: Issues using "live" install on Thinkpad T410.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 14:57:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: SOLVED: Issues using "live" install on Thinkpad T410]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27210#p27210</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Seriously though</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>The issue appears to relate to a hand-off from xfce4-power-manager to systemd/logind, which is controlled by a hidden xfconf property that didn&#039;t exist on this machine (possibly because it does not have systemd installed). Adding that property and setting it to &quot;false&quot; hands back control to xfce4-power-manager and everything works as it should. Perhaps something for the devs to look into; maybe Devuan should set this property by default?</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Would be interesting to hear what the Devuan gods say about this?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Lomax)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 14:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27210#p27210</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: SOLVED: Issues using "live" install on Thinkpad T410]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27207#p27207</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/roll.png" width="15" height="15" alt="roll" /></p><p><a href="https://noscript.net" rel="nofollow">https://noscript.net</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Lomax)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27207#p27207</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: SOLVED: Issues using "live" install on Thinkpad T410]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27206#p27206</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p><p><a href="https://www.i-dont-care-about-cookies.eu/" rel="nofollow">https://www.i-dont-care-about-cookies.eu/</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (dice)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27206#p27206</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: SOLVED: Issues using "live" install on Thinkpad T410]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27204#p27204</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>No cookie :&#039;(</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Lomax)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 10:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27204#p27204</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: SOLVED: Issues using "live" install on Thinkpad T410]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27187#p27187</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I can haz cookie?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Lomax)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27187#p27187</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: SOLVED: Issues using "live" install on Thinkpad T410]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27186#p27186</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Ha! I think I found the problem - and by the smell only. Something smelled wrong with the <span class="bbc">xfpm_manager_inhibit_sleep_systemd(): Inhibiting systemd sleep: handle-lid-switch</span> messages in the <span class="bbc">xfce-power-manager --debug</span> output, so I started digging in that spot. I soon found some interesting bug reports on the Xfce bug tracker, including this one: </p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p><a href="https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15300" rel="nofollow">Laptop lid action not respected</a><br />Xfce4-power-manager not respecting laptop lid setting.&#160; Regardless of power manager setting (Switch off display or Lock screen), closing the lid always results in suspend on ac or battery.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Not <em>quite</em> the same issue I was experiencing, but close enough to be potentially relevant. At first I was disappointed that the proposed solution didn&#039;t seem to have any effect (<span class="bbc">xfconf-query -c xfce4-power-manager -p /xfce4-power-manager/logind-handle-lid-switch -s false</span>), but in comment #10 on that bug report someone says </p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>Just in addition to the answers above, the setting didn&#039;t exist for me yet. I needed to create it.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>He suggests </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>sudo xfconf-query -c xfce4-power-manager -n -t &#039;bool&#039; -p /xfce4-power-manager/logind-handle-lid-switch -s false</code></pre></div><p> but since xfce4-power-manager runs in the user context (started from Sessions and Start Up &gt; Application Autostart) I ran the command without sudo - expecting to see a warning that the key already existed. But I got no such warning - and when I closed the lid afterwards the laptop <em>suspended and locked</em>. Multiple tests on battery &amp; on AC, with multiple reboots, confirms that this indeed fixed the problem. </p><p>So the lessons learned are 1) xfce4-power-manager handles suspend and locking without involving any scripts in /etc/acpi - as indicated by the CheckPolicy condition in lid.sh 2) the <span class="bbc">acpi-support</span> package is <em>not</em> needed (for this functionality anyway). 3) the issue appears to relate to a hand-off from xfce4-power-manager to systemd/logind, which is controlled by a hidden xfconf property that didn&#039;t exist on this machine (possibly because it does not have systemd installed). Adding that property and setting it to &quot;false&quot; hands back control to xfce4-power-manager and everything works as it should. Perhaps something for the devs to look into; maybe Devuan should set this property by default?</p><p><strong>Edit:</strong> Just to be clear, I now only have two acpi events/scripts defined, one of which is my home made mic-mute function: </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>$ ls /etc/acpi
events  powerbtn-acpi-support.sh  thinkpad_micmute.sh

$ ls /etc/acpi/events
powerbtn-acpi-support  thinkpad_micmute</code></pre></div><p>So the whole suspend &amp; lock on lid close process takes place elsewhere (i.e. xfce4-power-manager), and all that digging in /etc/acpi only turned up a red herring. Smelly, but red.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Lomax)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 10:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27186#p27186</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: SOLVED: Issues using "live" install on Thinkpad T410]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27184#p27184</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>When I check the box in the power management applet that says &quot;Lock screen when system is going for sleep&quot;, <span class="bbc">xfce4-power-manager --debug</span> outputs this: </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>TRACE[xfpm-xfconf.c:216] xfpm_xfsession_property_changed_cb(): property /shutdown/LockScreen

TRACE[xfpm-xfconf.c:225] xfpm_xfsession_property_changed_cb(): Property modified: /shutdown/LockScreen

TRACE[xfpm-xfconf.c:203] xfpm_xfconf_property_changed_cb(): Property modified: /xfce4-power-manager/lock-screen-suspend-hibernate

TRACE[xfpm-xfconf.c:203] xfpm_xfconf_property_changed_cb(): Property modified: /xfce4-power-manager/logind-handle-lid-switch

TRACE[xfpm-manager.c:645] xfpm_manager_inhibit_sleep_systemd(): Inhibiting systemd sleep: handle-power-key:handle-suspend-key:handle-hibernate-key

(xfce4-power-manager:7608): GLib-CRITICAL **: 00:53:09.746: g_error_free: assertion &#039;error != NULL&#039; failed</code></pre></div><p>And when I <em>uncheck</em> the checkbox I get: </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>TRACE[xfpm-xfconf.c:216] xfpm_xfsession_property_changed_cb(): property /shutdown/LockScreen

TRACE[xfpm-xfconf.c:225] xfpm_xfsession_property_changed_cb(): Property modified: /shutdown/LockScreen

TRACE[xfpm-xfconf.c:203] xfpm_xfconf_property_changed_cb(): Property modified: /xfce4-power-manager/lock-screen-suspend-hibernate

TRACE[xfpm-xfconf.c:203] xfpm_xfconf_property_changed_cb(): Property modified: /xfce4-power-manager/logind-handle-lid-switch

TRACE[xfpm-manager.c:645] xfpm_manager_inhibit_sleep_systemd(): Inhibiting systemd sleep: handle-power-key:handle-suspend-key:handle-hibernate-key:handle-lid-switch

(xfce4-power-manager:7608): GLib-CRITICAL **: 00:54:21.371: g_error_free: assertion &#039;error != NULL&#039; failed</code></pre></div><p>What&#039;s going on with <span class="bbc">handle-lid-switch</span> in the output above? </p><p>I removed the <span class="bbc">acpi-support</span> package (and rebooted) to reduce the number of moving parts, and had another look at the behaviour. If I close the lid with the box unchecked, the laptop suspends. If I close the lid with the box checked, <em>nothing</em> happens. If I press the suspend hotkey (Fn+F4) with the box checked, the laptop suspends <em>and locks</em>. If I press the suspend hotkey with the box unchecked, the laptop suspends. So the hotkey works exactly as it should, but the lidswitch doesn&#039;t. This is where I am after another long session - the battle continues tomorrow, and <em>I will</em> get this to work.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Lomax)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 01:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27184#p27184</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: SOLVED: Issues using "live" install on Thinkpad T410]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27183#p27183</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>No that didn&#039;t work - or at least not while xfce4-power-manager is running. I noticed that if I kill it then light-locker will lock the screen when I close the lid (because <span class="bbc">CheckPolicy</span> now returns false in the acpi lid script). If xfce4-power-manager is running nothing at all happens when I close the screen. <span class="bbc">xfce4-power-manager --debug</span> shows <em>nothing</em> when the lid is closed and opened.</p><p>Oh and I realised I made a mistake earlier; I shouldn&#039;t have run <span class="bbc">xfce4-power-manager --dump</span> as root, this will give misleading results since it normally runs as the user.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Lomax)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 23:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27183#p27183</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: SOLVED: Issues using "live" install on Thinkpad T410]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27182#p27182</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The plot thickens. If I leave <span class="bbc">sudo xfce4-power-manager --dump</span> running while I close/open the lid I get messages like this: </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>(xfce4-power-manager:7459): xfce4-power-manager-WARNING **: 22:25:05.954: Screensaver lock command not set when attempting to lock the screen.
Please set the xfconf property /general/LockCommand in xfce4-session to the desired lock command</code></pre></div><p>Which strengthens my suspicion that xfce4-power-manager is indeed where the problem lies. But: </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>$ xfconf-query -lc xfce4-session
/general/FailsafeSessionName
/general/SaveOnExit
/general/SessionName
/sessions/Failsafe/Client0_Command
/sessions/Failsafe/Client0_PerScreen
/sessions/Failsafe/Client1_Command
/sessions/Failsafe/Client1_PerScreen
/sessions/Failsafe/Client2_Command
/sessions/Failsafe/Client2_PerScreen
/sessions/Failsafe/Client3_Command
/sessions/Failsafe/Client3_PerScreen
/sessions/Failsafe/Client4_Command
/sessions/Failsafe/Client4_PerScreen
/sessions/Failsafe/Count
/sessions/Failsafe/IsFailsafe
/shutdown/LockScreen
/splash/Engine</code></pre></div><p>There is no such xfconf property for xfce4-session, and not for root either: </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>$ sudo xfconf-query -lc xfce4-session
/general/FailsafeSessionName
/sessions/Failsafe/Client0_Command
/sessions/Failsafe/Client0_PerScreen
/sessions/Failsafe/Client1_Command
/sessions/Failsafe/Client1_PerScreen
/sessions/Failsafe/Client2_Command
/sessions/Failsafe/Client2_PerScreen
/sessions/Failsafe/Client3_Command
/sessions/Failsafe/Client3_PerScreen
/sessions/Failsafe/Client4_Command
/sessions/Failsafe/Client4_PerScreen
/sessions/Failsafe/Count
/sessions/Failsafe/IsFailsafe
/splash/Engine</code></pre></div><p>Should I try to add it? And set it to, I dunno, <span class="bbc">light-locker-command -l</span>?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Lomax)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 22:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27182#p27182</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: SOLVED: Issues using "live" install on Thinkpad T410]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27180#p27180</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>So I noticed something odd, on my X230 I have installed the <span class="bbc">acpi-support</span> package (or something has pulled it in as a dependency), but this was <em>not</em> installed on the T410. It&#039;s really just a bunch of event definitions and handler scripts for /etc/acpi - including things like volume up/down, and lid close. So this is the mechanism my X230 uses to control the volume for example, which is why I don&#039;t need to add them as Application Shortcuts on that machine. BUT. Now that I have installed <span class="bbc">acpi-support</span> on the T410, it still doesn&#039;t work without the Application Shortcuts, despite the event looking identical on the two systems (e.g. button/volumedown VOLDN 00000080 00000000 K). So something else is missing or getting in the way. </p><p>There&#039;s more. The <span class="bbc">acpi-support</span> package also installs an event and support script for &quot;lid&quot; events - and this does get triggered when I open/close the lid (I moved my hommade acpi lid event handler out of the way first, of course), but it exits on the first condition: </p><p>/etc/acpi/lid.sh:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>if { CheckPolicy || HasLogindAndSystemd1Manager; }; then
        exit
fi</code></pre></div><p>Ok, so we don&#039;t have SystemD, it must be CheckPolicy which returns true then. Turns out CheckPolicy is just a list of power management utilities - including xfce4-power-manager - which, if present on the system, should handle the lid events.</p><p>/usr/share/acpi-support/policy-funcs:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>...
CheckPolicy() {
        local PMS

        getXconsole
        PMS=&quot;/usr/bin/xfce4-power-manager /usr/bin/mate-power-manager /usr/lib/dalston/dalston-power-applet&quot;
        pidof -x $PMS &gt; /dev/null ||
        PowerDevilRunning ||
        GnomeSettingsDaemonPowerRunning
}
...</code></pre></div><p>Or so the acpi script expects and happily exits. So I come back to xfce4-power-manager and not acpi as the likely culprit; hence the output of <span class="bbc">sudo xfce4-power-manager --dump</span> above.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Lomax)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 21:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27180#p27180</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: SOLVED: Issues using "live" install on Thinkpad T410]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27179#p27179</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>sudo xfce4-power-manager --dump</p><div class="codebox"><pre class="vscroll"><code>** (xfce4-power-manager:7459): WARNING **: 20:37:14.848: Failed to get name owner: 
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NameHasNoOwner: Could not get owner of name &#039;org.xfce.PowerManager&#039;: no such name

** (xfce4-power-manager:7459): WARNING **: 20:37:14.849: Failed to get name owner: 
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NameHasNoOwner: Could not get owner of name &#039;org.freedesktop.PowerManagement&#039;: no such name

** (xfce4-power-manager:7459): WARNING **: 20:37:14.850: Failed to get name owner: 
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NameHasNoOwner: Could not get owner of name &#039;org.xfce.PowerManager&#039;: no such name

(xfce4-power-manager:7459): xfce4-power-manager-WARNING **: 20:37:14.850: Unable to connect to session manager : 
Failed to connect to the session manager: SESSION_MANAGER environment variable not defined

(xfce4-power-manager:7459): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: 20:37:14.981: ../../../gobject/gsignal.c:2523: 
signal &#039;Changed&#039; is invalid for instance &#039;0x55e8e96c81e0&#039; of type &#039;GDBusProxy&#039;

(xfce4-power-manager:7459): xfce4-power-manager-WARNING **: 20:37:15.026: could not map keysym 1008ffa8 to keycode

(xfce4-power-manager:7459): GLib-CRITICAL **: 20:37:15.047: g_error_free: assertion &#039;error != NULL&#039; failed

** (xfce4-power-manager:7459): WARNING **: 20:37:15.048: No outputs have backlight property
xfce4-power-manager-Message: 20:37:15.089: Set kernel brightness switch to 0

(xfce4-power-manager:7459): xfce4-power-manager-WARNING **: 20:37:15.096: Failed to get keyboard max brightness level :
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownMethod: No such interface “org.freedesktop.UPower.KbdBacklight” on object at path 
/org/freedesktop/UPower/KbdBacklight
---------------------------------------------------
       Xfce power manager version 1.6.1
With policykit support
With network manager support
---------------------------------------------------
Can suspend: True
Can hibernate: True
Authorised to suspend: True
Authorised to hibernate: True
Authorised to shutdown: True
Has battery: True
Has brightness panel: True
Has power button: True
Has hibernate button: True
Has sleep button: True
Has LID: True</code></pre></div><p>Does that look right to you?</p><p><strong>Edit:</strong> A lot of the errors and warnings here come from the fact that, like an idiot, I ran the command with sudo. xfce4-power-manager should run in the user context and the root account (being disabled) likely misses many of the pieces which make it work.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Lomax)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 20:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27179#p27179</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: SOLVED: Issues using "live" install on Thinkpad T410]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27172#p27172</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Seems I&#039;m not alone experiencing a blank screen after resume: <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/xfce/comments/ikflf0/xfce_power_manager_when_resuming_it_resumes_to_a/" rel="nofollow">https://www.reddit.com/r/xfce/comments/ … umes_to_a/</a></p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>The issue is that when &quot;Lock screen when system is going to sleep&quot; is selected, resuming from suspend takes me to a blank screen - essentially an active screensaver - on which I have to press a key again in order to wake up the computer to show the login screen.</p></div></blockquote></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Lomax)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 15:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27172#p27172</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: SOLVED: Issues using "live" install on Thinkpad T410]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27171#p27171</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>have a look at the release notes for devuan beowulf.</p><p><a href="https://files.devuan.org/devuan_beowulf/Release_notes.txt" rel="nofollow">https://files.devuan.org/devuan_beowulf … _notes.txt</a></p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>### Workarounds for known lightdm issues/bugs</p><p>lightdm prevents some accessibility features from working and gives the<br />error, &quot;Couldn&#039;t register with accessiblity bus&quot; in ~/.xsession-errors.<br />(See Debian bug [#760740](<a href="https://bugs.debian.org/760740)" rel="nofollow">https://bugs.debian.org/760740)</a>)</p><p>This can be mitigated in the current X session by running:</p><p>&#160; xprop --root --remove AT_SPI_BUS</p><p>For a persistent solution edit /etc/lightdm/lightdm.conf to add:</p><p>&#160; &#160; xserver-share=false</p><p>Power buttons are disabled on the lightdm login screen with elogind.<br />(See Debian bug [#932047](<a href="https://bugs.debian.org/932047)" rel="nofollow">https://bugs.debian.org/932047)</a>)</p><p>Add the following line to /etc/pam.d/lightdm-greeter</p><p>&#160; &#160; session&#160; &#160;optional pam_elogind.so</p></div></blockquote></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (dice)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 15:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27171#p27171</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: SOLVED: Issues using "live" install on Thinkpad T410]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27170#p27170</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hmm... Digging around in dconf-editor I found the light-locker settings. One of the options is &quot;lock-on-suspend&quot;, and this was enabled. So why <em>didn&#039;t it</em> lock on suspend?</p><p><strong>Edit:</strong> I have confirmed that this is the same option as the &quot;Lock screen when the system goes to sleep&quot; checkbox on the security tab of Xfce Power Manager. Toggling one toggles the other.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Lomax)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 15:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27170#p27170</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: SOLVED: Issues using "live" install on Thinkpad T410]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27169#p27169</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I&#039;ll try that, but I just had a minor break through: I found this old issue on Xfce&#039;s old bugtracker: <a href="https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11488" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11488</a> Reading a bit further down, there are details of a patch that has been applied to xfce4-power-manager, the description of which is: </p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>Integrate Light Locker configuration into Xfce Power Manager. This<br />allows proper settings synchronization between the two applications<br />and eliminates some of the hackiness used in Light Locker Settings<br />to accomplish the same effect, and streamlines similar tools into<br />a single location. This depends on light-locker 1.5.1 configured<br />with the GSettings backend.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>&quot;Aha&quot; I thought, and tried setting lid close to &quot;Lock Screen&quot; in the power management applet, and hey presto, the computer now suspends <em>and locks</em> when I close the lid. If I remove the pm-suspend command from my acpi script it only locks, so this is still needed. And when it resumes the screen blinks multiple times before going to DPMS-off; I have to press a key on the keyboard to turn it back on. So it&#039;s not a perfect solution, but I&#039;m definitely getting closer!</p><p><strong>Edit:</strong> dconf-gsettings-backend is already installed.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Lomax)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 14:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27169#p27169</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
