<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=3724&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / Rtl8821ce new backports support]]></title>
		<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=3724</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Rtl8821ce new backports support.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 03:06:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Rtl8821ce new backports support]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23880#p23880</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Vernon)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 03:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23880#p23880</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Rtl8821ce new backports support]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23856#p23856</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#039;t matter actually, the tilde in the package name means that APT will treat it as older than the versions from the new release even if they are technically the same. But having an oldstable-backports repository makes no sense so it should be removed.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Head_on_a_Stick)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2020 16:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23856#p23856</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Rtl8821ce new backports support]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23850#p23850</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Head_on_a_Stick wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>...<br />If you do need the backported kernel then be sure to <strong>leave the repository enabled</strong> so that it&#039;s updated. I&#039;ve had too many arguments about this over at the MX forums but I&#039;m definitely right <img src="http://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/big_smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="big_smile" /></p><p>...</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Thanks. I assume you would want to disable the repository when&#160; upgrading to a new release?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Vernon)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 23:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23850#p23850</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Rtl8821ce new backports support]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23846#p23846</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The backported kernel is drawn from testing and so may be subject to the mandatory transition delay from sid, which may result in vulnerabilities being left exposed for longer than would be the case with the stable kernel.</p><p>If you do need the backported kernel then be sure to leave the repository enabled so that it&#039;s updated. I&#039;ve had too many arguments about this over at the MX forums but I&#039;m definitely right <img src="http://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/big_smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="big_smile" /></p><p>And note that &quot;unstable&quot; in De{vu,bi}an refers to the package version flux rather than reliability.</p><p>EDIT: yay for the rtl8821ce support though, thanks for the update OP.</p><p>EDIT2: and watch out for regressions with the backported kernel, the developers are too busy adding new <span class="bbs">vulnerabilites</span> features to worry about keeping old stuff working.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Head_on_a_Stick)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 19:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23846#p23846</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Rtl8821ce new backports support]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23845#p23845</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Not being very familiar with Debian/Devuan I was wondering if there are any risks or disadvantages in installing a backports kernel. For example, does it make package upgrades unstable? Thanks.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Vernon)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 18:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23845#p23845</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rtl8821ce new backports support]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23843#p23843</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>For those who own Lenovo laptops (V145-15AST for example), good news: in the backport repository, they recently added the 5.7 kernel which natively has the firmware for the rtl8821ce wireless driver, which previously had to be compiled and was not stable...</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (wasp)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 10:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23843#p23843</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
