<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=3103&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / need some help from my friends (FOSS development, Git, similar)]]></title>
		<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=3103</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in need some help from my friends (FOSS development, Git, similar).]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2019 12:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: need some help from my friends (FOSS development, Git, similar)]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=18216#p18216</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>fsmithred wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Graphics files can be part of a git project just like any other files. For example, ....</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Yes, blobs of various sorts are needed for *software* projects; maybe what i&#039;m asking is whether github (is it still the recommended repository?) is restricted to *software* projects alone, or if for example, blueprints for building a tiny-house,, as part of a construction project, would be accepted like anything else, or if they&#039;d cause some problem?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (noname)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2019 12:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=18216#p18216</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: need some help from my friends (FOSS development, Git, similar)]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=18208#p18208</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Graphics files can be part of a git project just like any other files. For example, go into the backgrounds folder here - <a href="https://git.devuan.org/devuan-packages/desktop-base" rel="nofollow">https://git.devuan.org/devuan-packages/desktop-base</a> - and click on one of the .png files.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=18208#p18208</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[need some help from my friends (FOSS development, Git, similar)]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=18203#p18203</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Greetings and salivations.</p><p>I&#039;ve been &quot;around&quot; for a long while.&#160; But the thing with linux (pardon me saying this please) is that to really use it, you have to learn it all, and i&#039;ve been learning just the bits that i&#039;ve needed so far.&#160; Many of them have changed from release to release, like the output of the mount command which changed... maybe 5 years ago, thus emphasizing the ill-advised nature of parsing command output.</p><p>Anyway I have too many projects and not enough time.&#160; The most important of these is something i&#039;m calling Hoss.&#160; It&#039;s a... a lot of things, based on a new &quot;hierarchical ontological-semantics&quot; database, which is basically just another filesystem.&#160; The thing about Hoss is, i want to make it freely available like all good FOSS applications, but... it will contain some chunks that i want to keep proprietary... not to hide secrets, but to make sure that when someone uses the resulting distro, they&#039;re using the approved/blessed/intended distro, not something hacked up to be unsafe.</p><p>It *seems* like i could do this by careful interface partitioning, so that the proprietary code is something external that runs on-top-of Hoss, but i&#039;m not a lawyer.&#160; Google et-all have been doing something like that, because we&#039;uns don&#039;t have all the good stuff they&#039;ve written on top of linux, because if we did, it would be mortally stupid not to have included it in Devuan or upstream.</p><p>Anyway it&#039;s about time for me to learn Git.&#160; Is there anything &quot;wrong&quot; with placing engineering drawings on github?&#160; I&#039;m also building a smart-tiny-home controller for offgrid use; although i&#039;ll offer it as a product, i want full engineering diagrams/specs to be freely available, so that anyone who doesn&#039;t want to pay me outrageously to solder stuff together, can just order the parts and do it themselves.&#160; Building physical stuff and shipping it is a mortal PITA especially if the customer lives outside the US due to customs tightening since 9/11, and i&#039;d prefer to spend my time not-soldering.</p><p>I&#039;m not asking for anyone to help write code.&#160; Though there will be things later that i&#039;ll need to learn somehow, like directly accessing the linux framebuffer, digging the longhand-arithmetic routines out of PHP, things like that.</p><p>Mostly what i need is some guidance in how to legally structure a FOSS application so that it can include proprietary chunks.</p><p>And suggestions about using something like github to store engineering drawings.</p><p>If any of y&#039;all would care to weigh in, i&#039;d appreciate the company.&#160; And if anyone out there wants to get stinking rich, this could be a way of getting from point-A to point-B without sacrificing ethics (or of wasting a whole bunch of time).</p><p>TIA for whatever.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (noname)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=18203#p18203</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
