<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2812&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / [Solved] Software selection in Devuan ASCII netinst]]></title>
		<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=2812</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in [Solved] Software selection in Devuan ASCII netinst.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 23:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [Solved] Software selection in Devuan ASCII netinst]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=16263#p16263</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>Dutch_Master wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... mark one of the named packages* for installation and everything it depends on, and of course the package itself, will stay on your system on autoremove.</p><p>*cleverly, choose one of the higher-level packages in the list, not the low-level ones that only add certain features <img src="http://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/tongue.png" width="15" height="15" alt="tongue" />&#160; I&#039;d suggest xfdesktop4 to start with.</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>aptitude install xfdesktop4</code></pre></div></div></blockquote></div><p>OK, thanks for the tip.&#160; =-)</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>Dutch_Master wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... <strong>strongly</strong> (very) prefer the &#039;old&#039; *nix way of su into the root account)</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Yes, I do too.<br />I&#039;ve come to see sudo as a rather dangerous thing if used (or rather set up) lightly.<br />It&#039;s something I picked up at the PCLinux OS forum.</p><p>I only use <span class="bbc">sudo</span> along with specific <span class="bbc">user_xxxx</span> files in <span class="bbc">sudoers.d</span> which are set up just for for me to do routine things which need admin rights.<br />eg: <span class="bbc">dmesg</span>, <span class="bbc">updatedb</span>, <span class="bbc">shutdown</span>/<span class="bbc">reboot</span>, <span class="bbc">linsssd</span> and such.&#160; &#160;</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>Dutch_Master wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>As the package is actually already installed, it won&#039;t <em>do</em> anything, except marking it in the database as manually installed and therefore not subject to an auto-prune event. Which is what you&#039;re after <img src="http://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p></div></blockquote></div><p>Yes, I was about to ask with respect to marking files as manually installed and the effect is had.</p><p>Thanks a lot for your input.</p><p>Best,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 23:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=16263#p16263</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [Solved] Software selection in Devuan ASCII netinst]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=16262#p16262</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>fsmithred wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... you keep trying to install the xfce4 package when you don&#039;t want it.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Ahh ...<br />So I&#039;ve been confusing <span class="bbc">xfce4</span> which is the metapackage with the <span class="bbc">xfce</span> desktop package.</p><p>Needless to say, I feel quite embarrassed.&#160; =-/</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>fsmithred wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... install the parts you do want as I posted above.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Thanks a lot for clearing this up for me.</p><p>Best,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 23:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=16262#p16262</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [Solved] Software selection in Devuan ASCII netinst]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=16253#p16253</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Alternatively, mark one of the named packages* for installation and everything it depends on, and of course the package itself, will stay on your system on autoremove.</p><p>*cleverly, choose one of the higher-level packages in the list, not the low-level ones that only add certain features <img src="http://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/tongue.png" width="15" height="15" alt="tongue" />&#160; I&#039;d suggest xfdesktop4 to start with.</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>aptitude install xfdesktop4</code></pre></div><p>Precede with sudo if you must (personal taste, I&#039;d <strong>strongly</strong> (very) prefer the &#039;old&#039; *nix way of su into the root account)</p><p>As the package is actually already installed, it won&#039;t <em>do</em> anything, except marking it in the database as manually installed and therefore not subject to an auto-prune event. Which is what you&#039;re after <img src="http://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Dutch_Master)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2019 17:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=16253#p16253</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [Solved] Software selection in Devuan ASCII netinst]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=16251#p16251</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The problem is you keep trying to install the xfce4 package when you don&#039;t want it. It&#039;s a metapackage that pulls in parts of the xfce4 desktop that you don&#039;t want. Just install the parts you do want as I posted above. </p><p>Here it is again, without the extra backslash at the end:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>apt install  xfconf xfdesktop4 xfwm4 xfce4-terminal xfce4-session xfce4-xkb-plugin xfce4-panel \
thunar thunar-volman thunar-archive-plugin xfce4-notifyd libnotify-bin mesa-utils  \
xfce4-power-manager xfce4-cpugraph-plugin  xfwm4-themes</code></pre></div><p>More info:</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>$ apt-cache show xfce4<br />Package: xfce4<br />Version: 4.12.3<br />Installed-Size: 16<br />Maintainer: Debian Xfce Maintainers &lt;pkg-xfce-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org&gt;<br />Architecture: all<br /><strong>Depends: xfwm4 (&gt;= 4.12.0), xfconf (&gt;= 4.12.0), xfce4-settings (&gt;= 4.12.0), xfce4-panel (&gt;= 4.12.0), xfdesktop4 (&gt;= 4.12.0), thunar (&gt;= 1.6.6), gtk2-engines-xfce (&gt;= 3.2.0), xfce4-session (&gt;= 4.12.0), xfce4-appfinder (&gt;= 4.12.0), xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin, orage (&gt;= 4.12.0), libxfce4ui-utils (&gt;= 4.12)</strong><br />Homepage: <a href="http://www.xfce.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.xfce.org/</a><br />Recommends: xorg, desktop-base (&gt;= 5.0.4), thunar-volman (&gt;= 0.8.1), tango-icon-theme (&gt;= 0.8.90), xfce4-notifyd<br /><strong>Description: Meta-package for the Xfce Lightweight Desktop Environment</strong><br />Description-md5: 53123f9cf40a71f1a87679634af17db3<br />Suggests: xfce4-goodies, xfce4-power-manager (&gt;= 1.4.0), gtk3-engines-xfce (&gt;= 3.2.0)<br />Tag: admin::configuring, interface::graphical, interface::x11, role::dummy,<br /> scope::utility, suite::xfce, uitoolkit::gtk, use::configuring,<br /> x11::application<br />Section: xfce<br />Priority: optional<br />Filename: pool/DEBIAN/main/x/xfce4/xfce4_4.12.3_all.deb<br />Size: 8014<br />MD5sum: f3c63bd59ac3aecd6d96ceeeea5f011c<br />SHA256: 72242e290d6efd1e672f25ec5eaf3c45925be2206e329081b02c19032b69397a</p></div></blockquote></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2019 14:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=16251#p16251</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [Solved] Software selection in Devuan ASCII netinst]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=16250#p16250</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>Dutch_Master wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>I.e., if you <strong><em>don&#039;t</em></strong> use the autoremove command, they&#039;re still installed. <img src="http://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p></div></blockquote></div><p>Indeed ...&#160; =-D !</p><p>I <em>did</em> think of that too.<br />But ...</p><p>At some time or another ie: a week, a month or even a year later, I surely <span class="bbu">will</span> have to use <span class="bbc">apt-get autoremove</span> for something or other.<br />eg: general spring clean-up.</p><p>And <em>that&#039;s</em> when things will go south very quickly.<br />Isn&#039;t this so?</p><p>Thanks for your input.</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2019 14:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=16250#p16250</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [Solved] Software selection in Devuan ASCII netinst]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=16249#p16249</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#039;re missing the point:</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:<br />gtk2-engines-xfce libical2 libkeybinder-3.0-0 libxfce4ui-utils xfce4-appfinder xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin<br /><ins>Use &#039;sudo apt autoremove&#039; to remove them</ins></p></div></blockquote></div><p>I.e., if you <strong><em>don&#039;t</em></strong> use the autoremove command, they&#039;re still installed. <img src="http://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Dutch_Master)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2019 14:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=16249#p16249</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [Solved] Software selection in Devuan ASCII netinst]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=16248#p16248</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>fsmithred wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>If you install the packages individually, you can remove them individually.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>OK.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>fsmithred wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... even do this if the packages were automatically installed ...</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Cannot seem to get it done.</p><p>eg:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>groucho@devuan:~$ sudo apt-get purge orage
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done

The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
gtk2-engines-xfce libical2 libkeybinder-3.0-0 libxfce4ui-utils xfce4-appfinder xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin
Use &#039;sudo apt autoremove&#039; to remove them.

The following packages will be REMOVED:
  orage* xfce4*
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
After this operation, 5723 kB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n
Abort.
groucho@devuan:~$ </code></pre></div><p>But this seems to be a Devuan/Debian thing as I have been told that in other distributions (eg: fedora) you can uninstall <span class="bbc">orage</span> without much ado.</p><p>I could always uninstall <span class="bbc">orage</span> and then reinstall the packages which were removed (<span class="bbc">xfce4</span> <span class="bbc">gtk2-engines-xfce</span> <span class="bbc">libical2</span> <span class="bbc">libkeybinder-3.0-0</span> <span class="bbc">libxfce4ui-utils</span> <span class="bbc">xfce4-appfinder</span> <span class="bbc">xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin</span>) but then re-installing <span class="bbc">xfce4</span> would drag along <span class="bbc">orage</span> <em>again</em>.</p><p>Catch22?</p><p>Best,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2019 12:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=16248#p16248</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [Solved] Software selection in Devuan ASCII netinst]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=15751#p15751</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The point of the metapackage is so that you can get a working desktop without having to type something like </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>apt install  xfconf xfdesktop4 xfwm4 xfce4-terminal xfce4-session xfce4-xkb-plugin xfce4-panel \
thunar thunar-volman thunar-archive-plugin xfce4-notifyd libnotify-bin mesa-utils  \
xfce4-power-manager xfce4-cpugraph-plugin  xfwm4-themes \</code></pre></div><p>Of course, now you don&#039;t have to type all that. You could just copy/paste it or modify it to fit your needs. </p><p>If you install the packages individually, you can remove them individually. You can even do this if the packages were automatically installed because of a dependency. When you &#039;apt-get install&#039; a package that was automatically installed, its status gets changed to manually installed. Then, when you remove the metapackage, the manually installed packages won&#039;t be removed.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fsmithred)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 11:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=15751#p15751</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [Solved] Software selection in Devuan ASCII netinst]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=15746#p15746</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t understand what is the problem. Netinstall: install core system even without X11 then install minimal working set of XFCE4 components. If you want extremely minimal XFCE4 desktop after installation you definitely need custom Devuan iso. If you don&#039;t like dependencies like orage - avoid such metapackages as xfce4 and task-xfce-desktop. You can make your own metapackage for minimal XFCE4 installation.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (ToxicExMachina)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 04:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=15746#p15746</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [Solved] Software selection in Devuan ASCII netinst]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=15741#p15741</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>PedroReina wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... the mantainer of the package <span class="bbc">xfce4</span> dont agree ...</p></div></blockquote></div><p>We may be drifting off topic here ...</p><p>But jo make my position clear: I&#039;m not nocking Linux or Devuan, quite the contrary.</p><p>It is just that (IMO) what XFCE does by forcing the installation of (unneeded) Orage and <span class="bbu">on top of that</span>, making it impossible to uninstall without also uninstalling XFCE altogether is <span class="bbu">contrary</span> to the basic philosophy behind Linux:</p><p>------------------- &gt; <span class="bbc">Do <span class="bbu">one</span> thing and do it well</span>.&#160; </p><p>There are other programs/maintainers that do this same sort of thing.<br />Must have all learnt how to do it at the Redmond Academy.&#160; 8-D!!!</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>PedroReina wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Different opinions, not big deal ...</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Well ...<br />It&#039;s the same type of <em>different</em> opinion than generated the need for Devuan.<br />systemd is also a <em>different</em> opinion on how to do things and <em>also</em> contrary to the basic philosophy behind Linux.&#160; </p><div class="quotebox"><cite>PedroReina wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>...&#160; is very simple: not install the package xfce4 ...</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Just what I am doing: openbox and tint2 work quite well for the time being.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>PedroReina wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... point Altoid talk about is very important for me.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>It is of the utmost importance, not only to both of us but for how Linux will continue to develop.</p><p>Thanks a lot for your input.</p><p>Best,</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2019 18:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=15741#p15741</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [Solved] Software selection in Devuan ASCII netinst]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=15734#p15734</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Altoid wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>My point being that getting <span class="bbc">Orage</span> installed <span class="bbu">by default</span> when installing the XFCE desktop does not seem to have any justification.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Agreed. But the mantainer of the package <span class="bbc">xfce4</span> dont agree with us. May be he/she thinks that the average XFCE user wants to have a nice calendar application installed by default. Different opinions, not big deal IMHO. My way of work with this is very simple: not install the package xfce4; I try to find the minimal set of packages needed to get XFCE working. This is why I need a lot of time before finish a new instalation.</p><p>The point Altoid talk about is very important for me. I like the Debian and Devuan aproach to have a very fine grained dependencies system. Other systems (even free software ones) have it more coarse. When I want a very minimal system, I dont like the attitude of &quot;I know better&quot; from some packagers, they say &quot;install all this staff&quot;. We are not clueless childrens. Just an example: I <strong>skip</strong> the &quot;Select and install software&quot; step in the Devuan expert install and then I <strong>uninstall</strong> a few packages more; you cant do that on other systems.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (PedroReina)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2019 08:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=15734#p15734</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [Solved] Software selection in Devuan ASCII netinst]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=15727#p15727</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>PedroReina wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>... defaults of any OS instalations are just that, the defaults.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Of course ...</p><p>My point being that getting <span class="bbc">Orage</span> installed <span class="bbu">by default</span> when installing the XFCE desktop does not seem to have any justification.<br />Or is it an essential part of XFCE, without which XFCE does not function at all or is in any way hampered?</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>PedroReina wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p> ... glad to know that your problem is fixed. <img src="http://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p></div></blockquote></div><p>Thanks.</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2019 20:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=15727#p15727</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [Solved] Software selection in Devuan ASCII netinst]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=15725#p15725</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Altoid wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>It&#039;s a pity that installing a desktop drags <span class="bbu">so much</span> stuff in with it ...</p></div></blockquote></div><p>The defaults of any OS instalations are just that, the defaults. Using Devuan we can <strong>not</strong> use the defaults and install only the packages we want; it is a time consuming task, but this way is easier to get to your ideal instalation. I do. But when I try a new system (say, Devuan Beowulf) a need between a week and a month to get it to my taste. With other OS (non free) I needed more than two months and the end result is not what I really wanted.</p><p>On the other hand, I&#039;m glad to know that your problem is fixed. <img src="http://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (PedroReina)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=15725#p15725</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [Solved] Software selection in Devuan ASCII netinst]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=15718#p15718</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>Altoid wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>This time the installation went through without any issues but the result has been the same as before, in the two machines I have.<br />But it will not boot.</p><p>I just get a&#160; j (lowercase) followed by a blinking underscore.</p><p>ie:&#160; j_</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I managed to fix the problem but have no idea why it happened or how to avoid it happening.</p><p>To fix it, with the USB installation in place, I booted with a Devuan ASCII 2.0.0_i386_DVD-1 installer DVD, went to Rescue Mode and reinstalled GRUB to the USB stick (/dev/sdb).</p><p>And that was it.</p><p>The drive booted into GRUB and upon logging in I installed XFCE4 which, after a reboot, started without any issues (for the time being).</p><p>rant<br />It&#039;s a pity that installing a desktop drags <span class="bbu">so much</span> stuff in with it ...<br />eg: I did not ask for an <span class="bbc">Orage Calendar</span> or <span class="bbc">Orage Globaltime</span>.<br />But there it is.</p><p>And uninstalling it <span class="bbu">also</span> uninstalls <span class="bbc">XFCE4</span> (and <span class="bbu">only</span> XFCE4).<br />Reminds me of some similar MS practises we have all suffered at some time or another ...<br />/rant</p><p>But the problem is fixed.</p><p>Thanks for your input.</p><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 23:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=15718#p15718</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [Solved] Software selection in Devuan ASCII netinst]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=15717#p15717</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>PedroReina wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Yes. Repeat the procedure. At the first error ...</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I&#039;ve repeated the procedure.<br />But in case there was some issue with the SDCard, this time I carried out the installation using the same devuan_ascii_2.0.0_i386_netinst.iso burnt to a CD instead of dd&#039;d to an SD Card.</p><p>Again, the CD-ROM was correctly verified.</p><p>This time the installation went through without any issues but the result has been the same as before, in the two machines I have.</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>But it will not boot.</p><p>I just get a&#160; j (lowercase) followed by a blinking underscore.</p><p>ie:&#160; j_</p></div></blockquote></div><p>The fdisk -l output is the same, only difference is where the boot partition starts (2048 instead of 4096):</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>groucho@devuan:~$ sudo fdisk -l /dev/sdf
[sudo] password for groucho: 
Disk /dev/sdf: 7.2 GiB, 7757398016 bytes, 15151168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x000312cd

Device     Boot    Start      End Sectors  Size Id Type
/dev/sdf1  *        2048  9220095 9218048  4.4G 83 Linux
/dev/sdf2        9222142 15151103 5928962  2.8G  5 Extended
/dev/sdf5        9222144 12294143 3072000  1.5G 82 Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sdf6       12296192 15151103 2854912  1.4G 83 Linux
groucho@devuan:~$ </code></pre></div><p>A.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Altoid)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 21:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=15717#p15717</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
