EDIT: and I've just upgraded that to 7.2 as well ofc.
EDIT2: holy crap, 7.1 was part of Alpine's 3.16 release. I didn't even realise...
]]>Version 7.1-2 of loksh is building now and should be available soon. I've tested installation to non-usrmerged systems so it should all work.
]]>I'll have to decide how best to fix it but I should have it working again very soon. The oksh package installs to /bin/oksh and so will work without usrmerge.
Sorry for the trouble.
@golinux: I was considering it but my mobility issues prevent me from queuing that long but are not serious enough to consider entry to the disabled line. I've had the live stream of Westminster Hall running in the background though, it is oddly compelling.
]]>Have you been to view Queen yet?
]]>Preparing to unpack .../archives/loksh_7.1-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking loksh (7.1-1) ...
Setting up loksh (7.1-1) ...
update-alternatives: error: alternative path /bin/loksh doesn't exist
dpkg: error processing package loksh (--configure):
installed loksh package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 2
loksh is located in /usr/bin, not in /bin
This occurred in devuan chimaera
Sorry for the delay, I was waiting for ibara@ to update their version but it looks like they're busy atm.
]]>OpenBSD devs probably are more security conscious
The oksh package is of a port by Dr. Brian Callahan, who is an actual OpenBSD developer. My repository is linked directly from their github README.md
But yes, the OpenBSD version is more secure because Linux doesn't have things like unveil(2) & pledge(2).
]]>Version 7.0 of oksh is now available. So Linux has it before OpenBSD
That is ironic, but I wonder which has the more secure version...
No offense, but OpenBSD devs probably are more security conscious...
]]>http://www.mirbsd.org/mksh-faq.htm#kornshell
Mksh is used as the default shell for Android so it is probably the most popular of all the shells, bash included.
]]>