<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2681&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / As an extensive user, GIMP 2.10.x is unusable. 2.8.x is great though!]]></title>
		<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=2681</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in As an extensive user, GIMP 2.10.x is unusable. 2.8.x is great though!.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 20:19:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: As an extensive user, GIMP 2.10.x is unusable. 2.8.x is great though!]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65156#p65156</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Could be an opportunity to fork it at 2.8 and possibly release it as a flatpak.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (yurimodin)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 20:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65156#p65156</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: As an extensive user, GIMP 2.10.x is unusable. 2.8.x is great though!]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65063#p65063</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It has been a long time and somewhere along the way things broke and I found a new, really simple solution to the problem: Use Distrobox to install the 2.8.18 version of GIMP in Ubuntu 16.04. It&#039;s so easy! This easy, in fact:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>sudo apt install distrobox

distrobox create --image quay.io/toolbx/ubuntu-toolbox:16.04 --name ubuntu16

distrobox enter ubuntu16

sudo apt install gimp gimp-data-extras

distrobox-export --app gimp</code></pre></div><p>And now you can use GIMP 2.8.18 like any other program on your system. </p><p>This is the same version that is available in Debian 9 (Stretch), so if a Distrobox image for Devuan ASCII existed it could be used instead of the one for Ubuntu 16. Ultimately, I don&#039;t think it would make much of a difference for this purpose, but Distrobox images for each Devaun release would be neat for those who want to &quot;keep it in the family&quot;.</p><p>Ps. I still hate new versions of GIMP. Even after making it <em>look</em> like the old version, several important aspects of my workflow are either outright broken or made to be obnoxiously convoluted. I was always fine with GIMP being its own thing, but I guess those who work on it somehow believe if they made it more like Adobe people will magically choose to use GIMP instead. In my case all they accomplished was alienating a person who spent <em>the better part of a decade</em> learning how to use GIMP the way they created it. I know, &quot;no one cares&quot;, but I felt like sharing anyway. <img src="http://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Tatwi)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 21:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=65063#p65063</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: As an extensive user, GIMP 2.10.x is unusable. 2.8.x is great though!]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26377#p26377</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>GNUser wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>@contrast - The best place to share this AppImage with a larger community would be at <a href="https://www.appimagehub.com" rel="nofollow">https://www.appimagehub.com</a> but unfortunately the requirements for submitting an AppImage there are too strict (the application needs to be compiled on a machine with very ancient glibc, for instance). It&#039;s just too much of a hassle.</p><p>Hopefully people who want an AppImage of gimp 2.8 will find this thread. I&#039;ll leave my tweaked, final version of the AppImage at this link indefinitely:<br /><a href="http://files.dantas.airpost.net/public/GIMP2.8-glibc2.17-x86_64.AppImage" rel="nofollow">http://files.dantas.airpost.net/public/ … 4.AppImage</a></p><p>Cheers!</p></div></blockquote></div><p>This is the version to use (it actually works), <strong>thank you!</strong></p><p>I&#039;m not sure why, but I had to extract the data files and link to them, as I did in a previous post, in order for the brushes, gradients, etc to show up. However, the &quot;Filters&quot; menu remains empty, even though GIMP knows to look for them in the /home/rob/bin/gimp/2.0/scripts directory. Is this the case for you as well? If not, any idea what I am doing wrong when running the appimage?</p><p>To run the appimage I set it as executable and double click it.</p><p>Anyway, thanks again GNUser.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Tatwi)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2020 15:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=26377#p26377</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: As an extensive user, GIMP 2.10.x is unusable. 2.8.x is great though!]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=24419#p24419</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Tatwi wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>There are fundamental differences in the way GIMP 2.10 handles several important functions that I used all the time, such as moving layers or selections that are behind other layers - in 2.8 it&#039;s possible to grab/move layers/elections that are behind other layers, while in 2.10 it&#039;s not. I literally can&#039;t do my work without that functionality. There are other things that also don&#039;t work properly anymore, where &quot;properly&quot; is the precedent set by over a decade of they worked in GIMP.</p><p>Good for you if you like GIMP 2.10, but there&#039;s absolutely no purpose for you to say so in this thread. It&#039;s like coming to this forum to post, &quot;Debian works for me&quot;. It adds nothing to the conversation. <img src="http://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/neutral.png" width="15" height="15" alt="neutral" /></p></div></blockquote></div><p>This is not true...</p><p>You can decide if working on the active layer or to have the autoselect mode activated and move any layer is clicked by the mouse, this is the default behavior since 2.6 </p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://docs.gimp.org/2.10/en/images/toolbox/move-dialog.png" alt="move-dialog.png" /></span></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Danielsan)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 12:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=24419#p24419</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: As an extensive user, GIMP 2.10.x is unusable. 2.8.x is great though!]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23459#p23459</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>There are fundamental differences in the way GIMP 2.10 handles several important functions that I used all the time, such as moving layers or selections that are behind other layers - in 2.8 it&#039;s possible to grab/move layers/elections that are behind other layers, while in 2.10 it&#039;s not. I literally can&#039;t do my work without that functionality. There are other things that also don&#039;t work properly anymore, where &quot;properly&quot; is the precedent set by over a decade of they worked in GIMP.</p><p>Good for you if you like GIMP 2.10, but there&#039;s absolutely no purpose for you to say so in this thread. It&#039;s like coming to this forum to post, &quot;Debian works for me&quot;. It adds nothing to the conversation. <img src="http://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/neutral.png" width="15" height="15" alt="neutral" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Tatwi)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2020 16:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23459#p23459</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: As an extensive user, GIMP 2.10.x is unusable. 2.8.x is great though!]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23456#p23456</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@contrast - The best place to share this AppImage with a larger community would be at <a href="https://www.appimagehub.com" rel="nofollow">https://www.appimagehub.com</a> but unfortunately the requirements for submitting an AppImage there are too strict (the application needs to be compiled on a machine with very ancient glibc, for instance). It&#039;s just too much of a hassle.</p><p>Hopefully people who want an AppImage of gimp 2.8 will find this thread. I&#039;ll leave my tweaked, final version of the AppImage at this link indefinitely:<br /><a href="http://files.dantas.airpost.net/public/GIMP2.8-glibc2.17-x86_64.AppImage" rel="nofollow">http://files.dantas.airpost.net/public/ … 4.AppImage</a></p><p>Cheers!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (GNUser)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2020 13:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23456#p23456</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: As an extensive user, GIMP 2.10.x is unusable. 2.8.x is great though!]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23452#p23452</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hey it&#039;s really cool you built Gimp 2.8 from source. I myself have no problem with gimp 2.10 as I just gave it the classic theme and a few custom configs. Anyway I&#039;m interested in people who can build old software on newer distros. I&#039;d be nice if this appimage could be shared with a larger community so anyone who happens to want 2.8 can get it.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (contrast)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2020 09:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23452#p23452</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: As an extensive user, GIMP 2.10.x is unusable. 2.8.x is great though!]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23441#p23441</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I find Gimp 2.10, better under any aspects...</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Danielsan)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2020 20:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23441#p23441</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: As an extensive user, GIMP 2.10.x is unusable. 2.8.x is great though!]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23319#p23319</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Awesome, <strong>thank you</strong> GNUser!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Tatwi)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 15:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23319#p23319</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: As an extensive user, GIMP 2.10.x is unusable. 2.8.x is great though!]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23301#p23301</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I figured it out. Gimp cannot find the plugins inside the AppImage. I came up with a quick fix, which involves two changes:</p><p>1. At root of AppDir there is <span class="bbc">gimp.desktop</span>. Change its <em>Exec</em> line from this:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>Exec=gimp-2.8 %U</code></pre></div><p>To this:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>Exec=gimp-2.8-wrapper %U</code></pre></div><p>2. Create (and mark as executable) <span class="bbc">AppDir/usr/bin/gimp-2.8-wrapper</span> with this in it:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>#!/bin/sh

dir=/tmp/gimp2.8-plugins

if [ ! -d &quot;$dir&quot; ]; then
	mkdir -p &quot;$dir&quot;
	HERE=&quot;$(dirname &quot;$(readlink -f &quot;${0}&quot;)&quot;)&quot;
	cp -r &quot;$HERE&quot;/../lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins &quot;$dir&quot;
fi

export GIMP2_PLUGINDIR=&quot;$dir&quot; 
exec gimp-2.8 &quot;$@&quot;</code></pre></div><p>Create AppImage from the tweaked AppDir. Now the AppImage works perfectly. Thanks again, Tatwi! <img src="http://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p><p>EDIT: I cleaned up the wrapper script a bit.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (GNUser)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2020 14:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23301#p23301</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: As an extensive user, GIMP 2.10.x is unusable. 2.8.x is great though!]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23300#p23300</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Tatwi. Thanks for sharing! The AppImage loads quickly and everything looks good. However, I can&#039;t open any files.</p><p>When I select File -&gt; Open, no files show up in the file selection window unless I choose &quot;All files&quot;. Then, whatever image file I select (even a common format such as jpeg) I get an error window saying &quot;Unknown file type&quot;.</p><p>Alas, I don&#039;t know enough about how GIMP/GTK file selection works to fix this.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (GNUser)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2020 12:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23300#p23300</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: As an extensive user, GIMP 2.10.x is unusable. 2.8.x is great though!]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23257#p23257</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>GNUser wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Hi, Tatwi. I use an AppImage of GIMP 2.10.8 but, like you, I&#039;m unhappy with the recent changes.<br />Can you please share your AppImage of GIMP 2.8.x for 64-bit?</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I stuck a copy of it in my Google Drive here, </p><p><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_fe5z5I7jKZrXRyee6x_BP-1e1obOPFD/view?usp=sharing" rel="nofollow">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_fe5z5 … sp=sharing</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Tatwi)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2020 03:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23257#p23257</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: As an extensive user, GIMP 2.10.x is unusable. 2.8.x is great though!]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23198#p23198</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Tatwi. I use an AppImage of GIMP 2.10.8 but, like you, I&#039;m unhappy with the recent changes.<br />Can you please share your AppImage of GIMP 2.8.x for 64-bit?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (GNUser)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2020 15:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23198#p23198</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: As an extensive user, GIMP 2.10.x is unusable. 2.8.x is great though!]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23188#p23188</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>I got it all working! Yay!</strong></p><p>It turned out that the paths to the various bits of GIMP needed to made absolute rather than relative. As such, I moved from using the compressed AppImage file to the plain AppImage folder, which I stuck in my home directory. </p><p>For example, the default path that is set relative to the AppImage doesn&#039;t work,</p><p>../../usr/lib/gimp/2.0/modules</p><p>where as the full path does work,</p><p>/home/rob/bin/GIMP-2.8.10/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/modules</p><p>These paths can be set using the Edit &gt; Preferences &gt; Folders UI or by editing the file ~/.gimp-2.8/gimprc.</p><p>So as a full run-down on how to make GIMP 2.8 work in Devuan Beowulf:</p><p>1. Clone <a href="https://github.com/AppImage/pkg2appimage" rel="nofollow">pkg2appimage</a> and install its dependencies.</p><p>2. Build the GIMP AppImage.</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>bash -ex ./pkg2appimage recipes/gimp.yml</code></pre></div><p>3. Copy (and rename) the GIMP.AppDir, which contains all the files needed to run GIMP 2.8, to somewhere useful on you drive, such as /opt/gimp.</p><p>4. Edit the gimp.desktop file so that can find the gimp executable.</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>Exec=/opt/gimp/bin/GIMP-2.8.10/usr/bin/gimp-2.8</code></pre></div><p>5. Open GIMP by running /opt/gimp/AppImage and close it again. This will create all the files in /home/YOUR_USERNAME/.gimp-2.8, one of which you&#039;ll edit in the next step.</p><p>6. Set the paths in the /home/YOUR_USERNAME/.gimp-2.8/gimprc file.</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>(plug-in-path &quot;/home/YOUR_USERNAME/.gimp-2.8/plug-ins:/opt/gimp/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins&quot;)
(module-path &quot;/home/YOUR_USERNAME/.gimp-2.8/modules:/opt/gimp/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/modules&quot;)
(interpreter-path &quot;/home/YOUR_USERNAME/.gimp-2.8/interpreters:/opt/gimp/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/interpreters&quot;)
(environ-path &quot;/home/YOUR_USERNAME/.gimp-2.8/environ:/opt/gimp/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/environ&quot;)
(brush-path &quot;/opt/gimp/usr/share/gimp/2.0/brushes:/home/YOUR_USERNAME/.gimp-2.8/brushes&quot;)
(brush-path-writable &quot;/home/YOUR_USERNAME/.gimp-2.8/brushes&quot;)
(dynamics-path &quot;/home/YOUR_USERNAME/.gimp-2.8/dynamics:/opt/gimp/usr/share/gimp/2.0/dynamics&quot;)
(dynamics-path-writable &quot;/home/YOUR_USERNAME/.gimp-2.8/dynamics&quot;)
(pattern-path &quot;/home/YOUR_USERNAME/.gimp-2.8/patterns:/opt/gimp/usr/share/gimp/2.0/patterns&quot;)
(pattern-path-writable &quot;/home/YOUR_USERNAME/.gimp-2.8/patterns&quot;)
(palette-path &quot;/home/YOUR_USERNAME/.gimp-2.8/palettes:/opt/gimp/usr/share/gimp/2.0/palettes&quot;)
(palette-path-writable &quot;/home/YOUR_USERNAME/.gimp-2.8/palettes&quot;)
(gradient-path &quot;/home/YOUR_USERNAME/.gimp-2.8/gradients:/opt/gimp/usr/share/gimp/2.0/gradients&quot;)
(gradient-path-writable &quot;/home/YOUR_USERNAME/.gimp-2.8/gradients&quot;)
(tool-preset-path &quot;/home/YOUR_USERNAME/.gimp-2.8/tool-presets:/opt/gimp/usr/share/gimp/2.0/tool-presets&quot;)
(tool-preset-path-writable &quot;/home/YOUR_USERNAME/.gimp-2.8/tool-presets&quot;)
(font-path &quot;/home/YOUR_USERNAME/.gimp-2.8/fonts:/opt/gimp/usr/share/gimp/2.0/fonts&quot;)
(theme-path &quot;/home/YOUR_USERNAME/.gimp-2.8/themes:/opt/gimp/usr/share/gimp/2.0/themes&quot;)
(script-fu-path &quot;/home/YOUR_USERNAME/.gimp-2.8/scripts:/opt/gimp/usr/share/gimp/2.0/scripts&quot;)</code></pre></div><p>7. Add menu entry for GIMP 2.8 (using menulibre) where the executable points to /opt/gimp/AppRun.</p><p>You can copy this personal menu file, located in /home/YOUR_USERNAME/.local/share/applications/menulibre-gimp-2.desktop to the system folder /usr/share/applications, so that it&#039;s available to all users.</p><p>8. Go forth and create with the best version of GIMP! <img src="http://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Tatwi)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2020 02:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23188#p23188</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: As an extensive user, GIMP 2.10.x is unusable. 2.8.x is great though!]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23026#p23026</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>OK, I have made some progress.</p><p>I wasn&#039;t able to compile any version of GIMP 2.8 directly in Beowulf, due to incompatible gimp related libraries.</p><p>However, using my Devuan ASCII desktop, I was able to create an AppImage of GIMP 2.8.10 from Debian Jessie packages using a modified version of the gimp <a href="https://github.com/AppImage/pkg2appimage" rel="nofollow">pkg2appimage</a>. </p><p>Everything works in the AppImage, <em>except the filters</em> and the fact that I had to manually copy the content of /usr/share/gimp/2.0/ from the AppImage to&#160; ~/.gimp-2.8/ for the brushes, etc. to work. I get the same result when running the completed AppImage as well as when running it from its source directory.</p><p>I logged the program output to file and it produced the following messages, </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>/home/rob/.gimp-2.8/themerc:7: Unable to find include file: &quot;././share/gimp/2.0/themes/Default/gtkrc&quot;
GIMP-Warning: Bad binary format string in interpreter file ././lib/gimp/2.0/interpreters/pygimp.interp

(gimp-2.8:5185): Gimp-Core-CRITICAL **: gimp_brush_generated_load: assertion &#039;g_path_is_absolute (filename)&#039; failed

....</code></pre></div><p>Where .... is an equivalent message for every file it couldn&#039;t find for the plugins, etc.</p><p>Here&#039;s the modified AppImage &quot;recipe&quot; that I used, </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>app: GIMP
binpatch: true

ingredients:
  dist: jessie
  sources:
    - deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
  pretend:
    - libcups2 1.7.2-0ubuntu1

script:
  - mv ./usr/lib/libblas/* usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/
  - mv ./usr/lib/lapack/* ./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/
  - sed -i -e &#039;s|././/||g&#039; usr/lib/gimp/2.0/interpreters/pygimp.interp
  - sed -i -e &#039;s|^Name=.*|Name=GIMP|g&#039; gimp.desktop</code></pre></div><p>It seems to me that the error,&#160; <strong>Unable to find include file: &quot;/home/rob/.gimp-2.8/themerc:7: ././share/gimp/2.0/themes/Default/gtkrc</strong> is the cause of missing filters, etc. I have no idea what &quot;themerc:7&quot; refers to and when I checked the files inside the AppImage, gtkrc and all the others are indeed where they&#039;re supposed to be.</p><p>Normally I am pretty good at debugging these kinds of things in software, but I&#039;m not seeing the solution to this one. Any help here would be awesome, I&#039;ve never used pkg2appimage before. There may be a Python related issue or may just be a path problem. I&#039;m entirely sure.</p><p>Thanks! <img src="http://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Tatwi)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2020 16:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23026#p23026</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
